Legacy phosphorus (P) that has accumulated in soils from past inputs of fertilizers and manures is a large secondary global source of P that could substitute manufactured fertilizers, help preserve critical reserves of finite phosphate rock to ensure future food and bioenergy supply, and gradually improve water quality. We explore the issues and management options to better utilize legacy soil P and conclude that it represents a valuable and largely accessible P resource. The future value and period over which legacy soil P can be accessed depends on the amount present and its distribution, its availability to crops and rates of drawdown determined by the cropping system. Full exploitation of legacy P requires a transition to a more holistic system approach to nutrient management based on technological advances in precision farming, plant breeding and microbial engineering together with a greater reliance on recovered and recycled P. We propose the term 'agro-engineering' to encompass this integrated approach. Smaller targeted applications of fertilizer P may still be needed to optimize crop yields where legacy soil P cannot fully meet crop demands. Farm profitability margins, the need to recycle animal manures and the extent of local eutrophication problems will dictate when, where and how quickly legacy P is best exploited. Based on our analysis, we outline the stages and drivers in a transition to the full utilization of legacy soil P as part of more sustainable regional and global nutrient management.
Core Ideas
Seed‐applied fungicides may inhibit arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and plant nutrient content.
Non‐target effects of seed applied fungicides may vary with crop and genotype.
No negative effects of seed applied fungicides on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi were found.
Plant genotype affected arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal colonization and plant nutrient content more than fungicide.
Seed‐applied fungicides have become standard on commodity crop seed to control pathogenic fungi prior to germination. However, fungicidal seed coatings containing multiple systemic ingredients targeting multiple metabolic processes may inhibit non‐target soil fungi such as obligate plant symbiotic arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi. Our experimental objectives were to: (i) determine if seed‐applied fungicidal formulations containing one or more systemic fungicides inhibit colonization of plant roots by AM fungi, plant development, or plant nutrient content during early vegetative stages of several commodity crops; (ii) identify interactions between fungicide and plant genotype. We evaluated seed‐applied fungicides labeled for use with corn (Zea mays L.), soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.], and oat (Avena sativa L.). Three corn hybrids, three soybean varieties, and two oat varieties were raised in the greenhouse for 6 wk. Three commercial fungicides containing mixtures of locally systemic, xylem‐mobile systemic, and contact active ingredients were compared to an untreated control. Plant development, plant nutrient concentration, and percent of root colonized by AM fungi (mixed species) were measured. Fungicidal seed coatings did not significantly reduce AM root colonization or P content of any plant compared to the control. There were significant (P < 0.05) differences among fungicides in AM fungal colonization or plant nutrient content for all three plants. Plant genotype significantly affected (P < 0.05) AM root colonization for corn, soybean, and oat. We conclude that contemporary, seed‐applied fungicidal formulations have minimal effect on AM colonization and nutrient status of corn, soybean, and oat which were more affected by host genotype.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.