This study examined sharing of diabetes responsibilities between mothers and their diabetic children and the relationship between patterns of mother-child sharing of responsibility for diabetes tasks and demographic variables, adherence, and metabolic functioning in children with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). A factor analysis of the Diabetes Family Responsibility Questionnaire (DFRQ), a 17-item questionnaire developed for the present study, resulted in a meaningful three-factor solution. Factors included responsibilities related to regimen tasks, General Health Maintenance, and Social Presentation of Diabetes. Analysis indicated that the DFRQ had adequate internal consistency and concurrent validity. One hundred and twenty-one children with IDDM, 6-21 years of age, and their mothers completed the DFRQ. Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) was used to index the child's level of metabolic control. Results of multiple regression analyses indicated that the child's age, disease duration, and sex are significant predictors of mother and child patterns of sharing diabetes responsibilities. Disagreements between mothers and children in perceptions of who is assuming responsibility and adherence level were significant predictors of HbA1c. Results indicated that children assume increasing responsibility with increasing age. Clinicians should not assume that mothers and children communicate about the sharing of diabetes responsibilities in the family or about changes in expectations of who is responsible as children develop. To foster better control and adherence in diabetic children, members of the health care team can help to identify diabetes tasks for which no one in the family takes responsibility.
Evaluated and compared the support provided by family members and friends for adolescents' diabetes care. Family and friend support also were examined in relation to other measures of social support, to demographic variables (age, gender, duration of diabetes) and to adherence. Using a structured interview, 74 adolescents with diabetes described the ways that family members and friends provided support for diabetes management (insulin shots, blood glucose monitoring, eating proper meals, exercise), and for helping them to "feel good about their diabetes." Families provided more support than friends for three management tasks (insulin injections, blood glucose monitoring, meals); this support was largely instrumental. In contrast, friends provided more emotional support for diabetes than families. Greater family support was related to younger age, shorter disease duration, and better treatment adherence. Implications of the findings include encouraging parents to remain involved in adolescents' treatment management, and involving peers as supportive companions for meals and exercise.
This research compares the family environments of diabetic adolescents in good (HbA1c less than 10), fair (10 greater than or equal to HbA1c less than or equal to 14), and poor (HbA1c greater than 14) control. Fifty-eight adolescents diagnosed with type 1 diabetes and their parents (mothers) were independently assessed with structured interviews, the Moos Family Environment Scale, and adolescents also completed the Piers-Harris Children's Self-Concept Scale. As compared with adolescents in poor control, those in good control reported fewer diabetes-related symptoms and had less anxiety and a more positive self-concept. Well-controlled youths also reported more cohesion and less conflict among family members. More parents of well-controlled youths stated that family members were encouraged to behave independently. In addition, more parents of poorly controlled adolescents believed that diabetes had negatively affected the child's personality, physical well-being, schooling, and participation in activities away from home. These findings suggest a complex interplay between the diabetic adolescent's psychological and physical functioning, metabolic control, and the family environment.
This study suggests that African-American youths with diabetes may be at greater risk for poor glycemic control due to the higher prevalence of single parenting and lower levels of adherence found in this population.
OBJECTIVE -To understand the impact of family structure on the metabolic control of children with diabetes, we posed two research questions: 1) what are the differences in sociodemographic, family, and community factors between single-mother and two-parent families of diabetic children? and 2) to what extent do these psychosocial factors predict metabolic control among diabetic children from single-mother and two-parent families?RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS -This cross-sectional study included 155 diabetic children and their mothers or other female caregivers. The children were recruited if they had been diagnosed with diabetes for at least 1 year, had no other comorbid chronic illnesses, and were younger than 18 years of age. Interviews and self-report questionnaires were used to assess individual, family, and community variables.RESULTS -The findings indicate that diabetic children from single-mother families have poorer metabolic control than do children from two-parent families. Regression models of children' s metabolic control from single-mother families indicate that age and missed clinic appointments predicted HbA 1c levels; however, among two-parent families, children' s ethnicity and adherence to their medication regimen significantly predicted metabolic control.CONCLUSIONS -This study suggests that children from single-mother families are at risk of poorer metabolic control and that these families have more challenges to face when raising a child with a chronic illness. Implications point to a need for developing strategies sensitive to the challenges of single mothers.
OBJECTIVE -This study evaluated the 3-month follow-up data of the Eat Well, Live Well Nutrition Program, a culturally specific, peer-led dietary change program designed to reduce the risk of type 2 diabetes in low-income African-American women. This peer-led program was delivered in the community and was tailored to the participants' stage of change for individual dietary patterns. We report the results of the 3-month intervention and the extent to which dietary changes and other key outcomes were maintained at a 3-month follow-up assessment.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS -Using an experimental control group design, 294 overweight African-American women (ages 25-55 years), recruited in collaboration with a neighborhood organization, completed pre-and posttest and 3-month follow-up interviews of dietary behaviors, knowledge, attitudes, fat intake, and weight.RESULTS -Significant reductions were found in fat intake among women in the treatment condition when compared with women in the control group; these reductions were maintained at 3-month follow-up assessment. Likewise, significant changes in dietary patterns were reported after the study and were maintained, except for one dietary pattern (replacement).CONCLUSIONS -This model of health promotion, which individually tailors dietary patterns through staging and use of peer educators, has the potential for decreasing fat intake and increasing and maintaining specific low-fat dietary patterns among overweight AfricanAmerican women at risk for diabetes.
Diabetes Care 25:809 -814, 2002
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.