Bioadhesives are used for tissue adhesion and hemostasis in surgery. A gelatin-resorcinol mixture crosslinked with formaldehyde (GRF glue) and/or glutaraldehyde (GRG) is used for this purpose. Although the bonding strength of the GRF glue to tissue is satisfactory, concerns about the cytotoxicity of formaldehyde are reported in the literature. It was suggested that the cytotoxicity problem of the GRF glue may be overcome by changing its crosslinking method. The study was therefore undertaken to assess the feasibility of using an epoxy compound (GRE glue), a water-soluble carbodiimide (GAC glue), or genipin (GG glue) to crosslink with a gelatin hydrogel as new bioadhesives. GRF glue and GRG glue were used as controls. The results of our cytotoxicity study suggested that the cellular compatibility of the GAC and GG glues was superior to the GRF, GRG, and GRE glues. The gelation time for the GG glue was relatively longer than the GRF and GRG glues, while no gelation time could be determined for the GAC glue. Additionally, it took approximately 17 h for the GRE glue to become adhesive. The GRF and GRG glues had the greatest bonding strengths to tissue among all test adhesives, while the bonding strengths of the GAC and GG glues were comparable. In contrast, there was almost no bonding strength to tissue for the GRE glue. However, the GRF and GRG glues were less flexible than the GAC and GG glues. Subsequent to the bonding strength measurement, each test adhesive was found to adhere firmly to the tissue surface and underwent cohesive failure during the bond breaking. In conclusion, the GRF and GRG glues may be used as tissue adhesives when their ability to bind tissue rapidly and tightly is required; the GAC and GG glues are preferable when the adhesive action must be accompanied with minimal cytotoxicity and stiffness; and the GRE glue is not suitable for bioadhesion in clinical applications

Gelatin microspheres have been widely evaluated as a drug carrier. Nevertheless, gelatin dissolves rather rapidly in aqueous environments, making the use of the polymer difficult for the production of long-term delivery systems. This adverse aspect requires the use of a crosslinking agent in forming nonsoluble networks in microspheres. However, the use of crosslinking agents such as formaldehyde and glutaraldehyde can lead to toxic side effects owing to residual crosslinkers. In an attempt to overcome this problem, a naturally occurring crosslinking agent (genipin) was used to crosslink gelatin microspheres as a biodegradable drug-delivery system for intramuscular administration. Glutaraldehyde was used as a control. In the in vitro study, the morphology, dynamic swelling, and antienzymatic degradation of test microspheres were evaluated. In the in vivo study, the biocompatibility and degradability of test microspheres were implanted in the skeletal muscle of a rat model via intramuscular injection. The results obtained in the study suggested that crosslinking of gelatin microspheres with glutaraldehyde or genipin may produce distinct crosslinking structures. The water transport mechanism in both the glutaraldehyde- and genipin-crosslinked gelatin microspheres exhibit anomalous behavior ranging from Fickian to Case-II extremes. The increase of the swelling diameter for the genipin-crosslinked microspheres was significantly less than that observed for the glutaraldehyde-crosslinked microspheres. In the animal study, it was found that the degree in inflammatory reaction for tissues implanted with the genipin-crosslinked microspheres was significantly less than that implanted with the glutaraldehyde-crosslinked microspheres. Additionally, the degradation rate of the genipin-crosslinked microspheres was significantly slower than their glutaraldehyde-crosslinked counterparts. These results indicated that the genipin-crosslinked gelatin microspheres may be used as a long-acting drug carrier for intramuscular administration.

Bioadhesives are used for tissue adhesion and hemostasis in surgery. A gelatin-resorcinol mixture crosslinked with formaldehyde (GRF glue) and/or glutaraldehyde (GRG) is used for this purpose. Although the bonding strength of the GRF glue to tissue is satisfactory, concerns about the cytotoxicity of formaldehyde are reported in the literature. It was suggested that the cytotoxicity problem of the GRF glue may be overcome by changing its crosslinking method. The study was therefore undertaken to assess the feasibility of using an epoxy compound (GRE glue), a water-soluble carbodiimide (GAC glue), or genipin (GG glue) to crosslink with a gelatin hydrogel as new bioadhesives. GRF glue and GRG glue were used as controls. The results of our cytotoxicity study suggested that the cellular compatibility of the GAC and GG glues was superior to the GRF, GRG, and GRE glues. The gelation time for the GG glue was relatively longer than the GRF and GRG glues, while no gelation time could be determined for the GAC glue. Additionally, it took approximately 17 h for the GRE glue to become adhesive. The GRF and GRG glues had the greatest bonding strengths to tissue among all test adhesives, while the bonding strengths of the GAC and GG glues were comparable. In contrast, there was almost no bonding strength to tissue for the GRE glue. However, the GRF and GRG glues were less flexible than the GAC and GG glues. Subsequent to the bonding strength measurement, each test adhesive was found to adhere firmly to the tissue surface and underwent cohesive failure during the bond breaking. In conclusion, the GRF and GRG glues may be used as tissue adhesives when their ability to bind tissue rapidly and tightly is required; the GAC and GG glues are preferable when the adhesive action must be accompanied with minimal cytotoxicity and stiffness; and the GRE glue is not suitable for bioadhesion in clinical applications.

In an attempt to overcome the cytotoxicity problem of the glutaraldehyde-fixed tissues, a naturally occurring crosslinking agent (genipin) was used by our group to fix biological tissues. The study was intended to investigate the rate of tissue fixation by genipin. Glutaraldehyde was used as a control. In addition, the degrees of tissue fixation by genipin at different pHs (pH 4.0, pH 7. 4, pH 8.5, or pH 10.5), temperatures (4 degrees C, 25 degrees C, 37 degrees C, or 45 degrees C), and initial fixative concentrations (0.250%, 0.625%, or 1.000%) were examined. The results obtained revealed that the rate of tissue fixation by glutaraldehyde was significantly faster than that by genipin. The degree of tissue fixation by genipin may be controlled by adjusting its fixation duration or fixation conditions. The order in degree of tissue fixation by genipin at different pHs, from high to low, was: at nearly neutral pH (pH 7.4 or pH 8.5) > at basic pH (pH 10.5) > at acidic pH (pH 4.0). The degrees of tissue fixation by genipin at different temperatures were about the same, except for that at 4 degrees C. In contrast, the initial fixative concentration did not seem to affect the degree of tissue fixation by genipin, if only the amount of genipin in the fixation solution was sufficient to complete tissue fixation. The concentrations of genipin in the aqueous solutions at different pHs, temperatures, and initial fixative concentrations tended to decrease with time with or without the occurrence of tissue fixation. This indicated that genipin was not stable in the aqueous solution. The instability of aqueous genipin was more remarkable with increasing pH or temperature. The results obtained in this study may be used to optimize the fixation process for developing bioprostheses fixed by genipin.