In March of this year, COVID-19 was declared a pandemic, and it continues to threaten public health. This global health crisis imposes limitations on daily movements, which have deteriorated every sector in our society. Understanding public reactions to the virus and the non-pharmaceutical interventions should be of great help to fight COVID-19 in a strategic way. We aim to provide tangible evidence of the human mobility trends by comparing the day-by-day variations across the U.S. from January 2020 to early April 2020. Large-scale public mobility at an aggregated level is observed by leveraging mobile device location data and the measures related to social distancing. Our study captures spatial and temporal heterogeneity as well as the sociodemographic variations and teleworking trends regarding the pandemic propagation and the non-pharmaceutical mobility interventions. All metrics adapted capture decreased public movements after the national emergency declaration. The population staying home has increased in all states before the stay-at-home mandates implemented and becomes more stable after the order with a smaller range of fluctuation. The public had been taking active responses, voluntarily staying home more, to the in-state confirmed cases while the stay-at-home orders stabilize the variations. As the estimated teleworking rates also continue to incline throughout the study period, the teleworking trend can be another driving factor for the growing stay-at-home population. We confirm that there exists overall mobility heterogeneity between the income or population density groups. The study suggests that public mobility trends are in line with the government message urging to stay home. We anticipate our data-driven analysis offers integrated perspectives and serves as evidence to raise public awareness and, consequently, reinforce the importance of social distancing while assisting policymakers.
To increase traffic mobility and safety, several types of active traffic management (ATM) strategies, such as variable speed limit (VSL), ramp metering, dynamic message signs, and hard shoulder running (HSR), are adopted in many countries. While all kinds of ATM strategies show promise in releasing traffic congestion, many studies indicate that stand-alone strategies have very limited capability. To remedy the defects of stand-alone strategies, cooperative ATM strategies have caught researchers’ attention and different combinations have been studied. In this paper, a coordinated VSL and HSR control strategy based on a reinforcement learning technique—Q-learning—is proposed. The proposed control strategy bridges up a direct connection between the traffic flow data and the ATM control strategies via intensive self-learning processes, thus reducing the need for human knowledge. A typical congested interstate highway, I-270 in Maryland, United States, was selected as the study area to evaluate the proposed strategy. A dynamic traffic assignment simulation model was introduced to calibrate the network with real-world data and was used to evaluate the regional impact of the proposed algorithm. Simulation results indicated that the proposed coordinated control could reduce corridor travel time by up to 27%. The performance of various control strategies were also compared. The results suggested that the proposed strategy outperformed the stand-alone control strategies and the traditional feedback-based VSL strategy in mitigating congestion and reducing travel time on the freeway corridor.
Mobility interventions in communities play a critical role in containing a pandemic at an early stage. The real‐world practice of social distancing can enlighten policymakers and help them implement more efficient and effective control measures. A lack of such research using real‐world observations initiates this article. We analyzed the social distancing performance of 66,149 census tracts from 3,142 counties in the United States with a specific focus on income profile. Six daily mobility metrics, including a social distancing index, stay‐at‐home percentage, miles traveled per person, trip rate, work trip rate, and non‐work trip rate, were produced for each census tract using the location data from over 100 million anonymous devices on a monthly basis. Each mobility metric was further tabulated by three perspectives of social distancing performance: “best performance,” “effort,” and “consistency.” We found that for all 18 indicators, high‐income communities demonstrated better social distancing performance. Such disparities between communities of different income levels are presented in detail in this article. The comparisons across scenarios also raise other concerns for low‐income communities, such as employment status, working conditions, and accessibility to basic needs. This article lays out a series of facts extracted from real‐world data and offers compelling perspectives for future discussions.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.