No abstract

Purpose To assess the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance (MR) elastography-derived liver stiffness to detect liver fibrosis in a pediatric and young adult population with a spectrum of liver diseases. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included patients younger than 21 years of age who underwent MR elastography and liver biopsy within 3 months of one another between January 2012 and September 2016 for indications other than liver transplantation or Fontan palliation of congenital heart disease. MR elastography examinations were reprocessed by a single observer, blinded to pathologic findings. Pathology specimens were reviewed by a single pathologist who scored steatosis (lipid in ≥ 5% of hepatocytes) and staged fibrosis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess diagnostic performance. Results A total of 86 patients, 49 (57%) male with a median age of 14.2 years (range, 0.3-20.6 years), were included. Fifty-one patients (59.3%) had Ludwig stage 2 or higher fibrosis; 44 patients (51.2%) had hepatic steatosis. The area under the ROC curve for Ludwig stage 0-1 versus stage 2 or higher fibrosis was 0.70 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.59, 0.81) for the whole population and was significantly lower for patients with steatosis versus those without (0.53 [95% CI: 0.35, 0.71] vs 0.82 [95% CI: 0.67, 0.96], P = .014). Optimal stiffness cut-offs for the entire population were 2.27 kPa with 68.6% sensitivity (95% CI: 57.2%, 80.1%) and 74.3% specificity (95% CI: 63.5%, 85.1%) or 1.67 kPa with 35.3% sensitivity (95% CI: 23.5%, 47.1%) and 91.4% specificity (95% CI: 84.5%, 98.3%). Conclusion In children and young adults, MR elastography performs significantly better for distinguishing stage 0-1 versus stage 2 or higher fibrosis in patients without steatosis than in those with steatosis. This suggests a confounding effect of steatosis or inflammation in the population with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. RSNA, 2018.

By identifying phenotypes and associated risk factors, timing of interventions may be more precisely targeted for subgroups at highest risk of lung function loss.

No abstract

No abstract