No study has investigated the role of induced membrane (IM) formation in treating diabetic foot ulcer (DFU). This retrospective study was aimed (1) at evaluating the potential role of a two-staged surgical approach, comprising polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) implantation and IM formation, in the treatment of DFU and (2) at comparing the results of those with routine wound debridement in patients with DFUs and nonrevascularized peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Fifty patients with infected DFUs who were not candidates for vascular interventions were enrolled between February 2016 and April 2018 and assigned to the PMMA group (n = 28) and conventional group (n = 22). The healing rate, major amputation rate, duration of healing, frequency of debridement procedures, patient survival rate, and reulceration of DFUs were determined. The Mann-Whitney U test, independent sample t-test, and χ2 or Fisher exact test were used in statistical analysis. Overall clinical outcomes were statistically different between the groups (Z = −2.495, P = 0.013). In the PMMA group, 16 patients (57.1%) with intact IM formation achieved ulceration healing at 13.1 ± 3.7 weeks with a mean number of debridements of 1.3 ± 0.4, which were significantly different compared to those values in 5 patients of the conventional group (22.7%, P = 0.014; healing duration: 26.4 ± 7.8 weeks, P = 0.016; mean number of debridements: 3.6 ± 0.5, P ≤ 0.001). At a mean 16.8 ± 4.3-month follow-up, patient survival rates were 92.9% and 68.2% in the PMMA and conventional groups, respectively (P = 0.032). The major amputation rate and reulceration of DFUs were similar between the groups. The two-staged surgical approach is an available, effective modality for improving healing of DFUs. This study provides preliminary information of IM formation followed by PMMA implantation in the management of DFUs in PAD when revascularization is not feasible.
Introduction: Diabetic foot infections (DFIs) pose a huge challenge for clinicians. Staphylococcus aureus, including methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), is one of the most significant pathogens of DFI. Early pathogen identification will greatly benefit the diagnosis and treatment of the disease. However, existing diagnostic methods are not effective in early detection.Methods: We developed an assay that coupled loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) techniques to enable quick and specific detection of Staphylococcus aureus and differentiate MRSA in samples from patients with DFI. Furthermore, the results were compared using a reference culture, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR), and metagenomics next generation sequencing (mNGS).Results: The CRISPR-LAMP assay targeting nuc and mecA successfully detected S. aureus strains and differentiated MRSA. The limit of detection (LoD) of the real-time LAMP for nuc and mecA was 20 copies per microliter reaction in comparison to two copies per μL reaction for the qRT-PCR assay. The specificity of the LAMP-CRISPR assay for nuc was 100%, without cross-reactions with non-S. aureus strains. Evaluating assay performance with 18 samples from DFI patients showed that the assay had 94.4% agreement (17/18 samples) with clinical culture results. The results of mNGS for 8/18 samples were consistent with those of the reference culture and LAMP-CRISPR assay.Conclusion: The findings suggest that the LAMP-CRISPR assay could be promising for the point-of-care detection of S. aureus and the differentiation of MRSA in clinical samples. Furthermore, combining the LAMP-CRISPR assay and mNGS provides an advanced platform for molecular pathogen diagnosis of DFI.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.