This paper analyzed the results of a modified and simpler technique for distinguishing the intersegmental border during lung segmentectomy surgery. From January 2013 to December 2015, 539 patients with screening‐detected lung nodules <2 cm in maximum diameter underwent anatomic segmentectomy. With the guidance of preoperative three‐dimensional computed tomography bronchography and angiography, the bronchus, artery, and intrasegmental vein of the targeted segment could be precisely dissected under unilateral differential ventilation, and then intersegmental demarcation was confirmed by the modified inflation‐deflation method. The demarcation presented by this method was highly coincident with the real intersegmental border. Dissection along the border between the collapsed and inflated segments using either electrocautery or staples was safe, with almost no air leak or bleeding. This technique is a simple and effective alternative to previously described intersegmental border marking methods.
BackgroundExtended or combined segmentectomies are usually adapted for intersegmental pulmonary nodules. This study explored precise combined subsegmentectomy (CSS) under the guidance of three‐dimensional computed tomography bronchography and angiography (3D‐CTBA).MethodsThe definition of a pulmonary intersegmental nodule was based on a minimum distance between the nodule and the involved intersegmental veins in the preoperative 3D‐CTBA being less than the size of the nodule. Centering on the involved intersegmental vein, two adjacent subsegments belonging to the different segments were combined as a resected unit.ResultsWe retrospectively reviewed the records of 47 patients (mean age 53.6 ± 12.3, range: 26–81 years) who underwent CSS. Thirty‐nine (83.0%) nodules were involved in most intersegmental locations of the upper lobes; the remainder in the lower lobes. The mean nodule size was 0.86 ± 0.32 cm; the mean margin width was 2.20 ± 0.38 cm. Pathological stages included: Tis (8 cases), T1mi (16), IA1 (T1aN0M0, 13), and IA2 (T1bN0M0, 5). Pathological diagnoses included: invasive adenocarcinoma (18 cases), minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (16), adenocarcinoma in situ (8), atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (3), and benign (2). The average operative duration was 190.8 ± 54.9 minutes; operative hemorrhage was 42.7 ± 23.0 mL; 5.8 ± 2.8 lymph nodes dissected had not metastasized; the duration of postoperative chest tube drainage was 3.0 ± 1.8 days; and the postoperative hospital stay was 5.3 ± 2.4 days.ConclusionsUnder 3D navigation, thoracoscopic CSS is a safe technique for intersegmental nodules, sparing more pulmonary parenchyma and ensuring safe margins to achieve anatomical resection.
Thoracoscopic anatomic pulmonary segmentectomy and subsegmentectomy have become sophisticated surgical solutions for complex pulmonary diseases. The rapid development of three-dimensional computed tomographic angiography (3DCTA) has made it possible to provide more refined individualized anatomic details and has consequently enabled subsubsegmentectomy (SSS). In this study, we report two successful thoracoscopic anatomic SSSs of the left Saii and Saii under the guidance of 3DCTA reconstructed images. To the best of our knowledge, these are the first two cases of SSSs ever detailed reported. The nomenclature of subsubsegments is adopted according to the Japanese Committee on the Nomenclature for Bronchial Branching.
The construction of a gastric tube through the thoracic cavity using ILMIE is feasible and safe in patients with middle or lower oesophageal cancer. However, longer follow-up and larger sample sizes are needed to evaluate the oncological efficacy.
Segmentectomy is a widely adopted surgical procedure, however, experiences of tailoring the intersegmental border have rarely been reported. This paper investigates the strategy and results of tailoring complex demarcation during lung segmentectomy surgery. Because intersegmental demarcation can be divided into plane or curved types according to the location and stereo shape of a segment, a one‐size‐fits‐all method for tailoring the intersegmental demarcation is obviously unreasonable. For tailoring a complex segmentectomy with two or more curved borders, tips including good exposure of the intersegmental demarcation, sharp‐blunt combined dissection skill, “work‐plane” extension, and “gate” opening techniques all contribute to an accurate segmentectomy. This technique, based on anatomical characteristics, can provide a cutting surface with a greater physiological shape and less curling of the edge, and should be recommended as a general standard method for tailoring complex demarcation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.