Objectives Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is a common indication for adenoidectomy and tonsillectomy in children. Traditional practice involves overnight admission to monitor for respiratory complications. However, there is a shift towards same‐day discharge in selected patients. This systematic review aims to critically evaluate day‐case criteria and safety in children with OSA undergoing adenotonsillectomy. Design We performed a systematic search of EMBASE, Medline and the Cochrane library. All data collected were independently validated for accuracy. Quality assessment of included articles was performed. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO. Results A total of 15 studies were included (10 731 patients). There was heterogeneity in methods used to ascertain OSA, day‐case discharge criteria and lack of prospective discharge protocol. The proportion of children considered for planned day‐case surgery ranged from 28.7%–100% based on individual criteria, with an average rate of successful same‐day discharge of 96.1% in these patients. The reported rates of post‐operative respiratory adverse events and need for airway intervention were 0%–27.3% and 0.4%–6.8%, respectively. There was no reported mortality. The studies were considered low to medium on quality assessment. Conclusion There is a lack of prospective data on day‐case criteria and systematic assessment of post‐operative complications in children with OSA undergoing adenoidectomy and tonsillectomy. However, current literature suggests that day‐case surgery is safe in carefully selected patients. Better characterisation of patient‐specific risk factors is needed to develop an optimal criteria‐based timeline for safe discharge. This has the potential to improve confidence and uptake across units.

Introduction: Recent guidelines suggest obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is not an absolute contraindication for same day discharge following surgery. The aim of this systematic review was to examine the feasibility and safety of day case nasal and/or palatopharyngeal surgery in patients with OSA.Methods: We performed a systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane library. Quality assessment of included studies was performed. The protocol of this systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021273451).Results: A total of 1836 patients from 10 observational studies were included. There were 268 (15.4%) nasal surgeries, 738 palatopharyngeal surgeries (42.4%) and 735 (42.2%) combined nasal and palatopharyngeal surgery. The majority of patients had moderate to severe OSA. A total of 860 patients (49.8%) were successfully discharged as day cases. There were no standard criteria for daycase surgery. Postanaesthetic respiratory events were reported in 86/1750 (4.9%) patients. Oxygen desaturation was the most common respiratory event (83.7%, n = 72). There was no mortality reported. Conclusion:Current data suggests day surgery is feasible in carefully selected patients with OSA undergoing nasal and/or palatopharyngeal surgery. Further welldesigned prospective studies with an emphasis on the systematic assessment of complications are required to establish safety and daycase criteria.

Isolated sphenoid sinus disease is a rare, often misdiagnosed condition of the paranasal sinus. If left untreated, it can lead to complications involving pituitary gland, cavernous sinus, neurological and vascular structures nearby. Early recognition and treatment are critical to prevent the progression of the disease. We present a case of a 60-year-old woman with a history of severe left-sided headache, facial pain, diplopia and left lateral rectus palsy. She was initially referred to ophthalmology and rheumatology for possible giant cell arteritis. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed opacification in left sphenoid sinus with cavernous sinus/superior orbital fissure involvement consistent with left sphenoid sinusitis. She was then referred to the ear, nose and throat department and had endoscopic transnasal sphenoidotomy in theatre. Culture results showed Haemophilus influenza and fungal pseudohyphae. She recovered three months later after a course of antibiotics and antifungals. The onset of isolated sphenoid sinus disease is often insidious and the diagnosis of this condition remains a challenge. Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography remain the best diagnostic tools to recognise and manage this condition.

No abstract

Background Isolated sphenoid sinus disease (ISSD) is a rare, often misdiagnosed condition of the paranasal sinus. If left untreated, it can lead to complications involving pituitary gland, cavernous sinus, neurologic, and vascular structures nearby. Case report We present a case of a 60-year-old female with a history of severe left-sided headache, facial pain, diplopia, and left lateral rectus palsy. She was initially referred to ophthalmology and rheumatology for possible giant cell arteritis. MRI scans revealed opacification in left sphenoid sinus consistent with left sphenoid sinusitis. There were no signs of cavernous sinus thrombosis. She was then referred to ENT and underwent endoscopic transnasal sphenoidotomy procedure. Culture results showed Haemophilus Influenza and fungal pseudohyphae. Her palsy and headaches recovered completely 3 months later with a course of antibiotics and antifungals. Literature review for lateral rectus palsy secondary to sphenoid sinusitis without cavernous sinus thrombosis showed it is not a common condition and this case report should serve as a reminder to consider paranasal sinus disease when assessing these patients. Conclusions The onset of ISSD is often insidious and diagnosis of this condition remains a challenge. MRI and CT imaging remain the gold standard for recognising and managing this condition.