Plants deploy cell-surface and intracellular leucine rich-repeat domain (LRR) immune receptors to detect pathogens 1 . LRR receptor kinases and LRR receptor proteins at the plasma membrane recognize microorganism-derived molecules to elicit pattern-triggered immunity (PTI), whereas nucleotide-binding LRR proteins detect microbial effectors inside cells to confer effector-triggered immunity (ETI). Although PTI and ETI are initiated in different host cell compartments, they rely on the transcriptional activation of similar sets of genes 2 , suggesting pathway convergence upstream of nuclear events. Here we report that PTI triggered by the Arabidopsis LRR receptor protein RLP23 requires signalling-competent dimers of the lipase-like proteins EDS1 and PAD4, and of ADR1 family helper nucleotide-binding LRRs, which are all components of ETI. The cell-surface LRR receptor kinase SOBIR1 links RLP23 with EDS1, PAD4 and ADR1 proteins, suggesting the formation of supramolecular complexes containing PTI receptors and transducers at the inner side of the plasma membrane. We detected similar evolutionary patterns in LRR receptor protein and nucleotide-binding LRR genes across Arabidopsis accessions; overall higher levels of variation in LRR receptor proteins than in LRR receptor kinases are consistent with distinct roles of these two receptor families in plant immunity. We propose that the EDS1-PAD4-ADR1 node is a convergence point for defence signalling cascades, activated by both surface-resident and intracellular LRR receptors, in conferring pathogen immunity.Arabidopsis thaliana (hereafter Arabidopsis) cell-surface LRR receptor kinases (LRR-RKs) and LRR receptor protein (LRR-RP)-SOBIR1 complexes recruit the co-receptor BAK1 and signal through receptor-like cytoplasmic kinases (RLCKs) to elicit PTI 3 . Intracellular coiled-coil (CC)-nucleotide-binding LRR (NLR) or TOLL-INTERLEUKIN 1 RECEP-TOR (TIR)-NLR receptors 4 require ADR1-type and NRG1-type helper NLRs (hNLRs) and the lipase-like EDS1 family proteins EDS1, PAD4 and SAG101 to confer ETI 5,6 . While the defence outputs for PTI and ETI are qualitatively similar 2 , where and how pathways activated in different cell compartments converge remain unclear. Effective plant defence relies on mutual potentiation of PTI and ETI pathways 7,8 , suggesting mechanistic links between these two tiers of the plant immune system. RLCKs PBL30 and PBL31 mediate PTIThe Arabidopsis class VII RLCK (RLCK-VII) BIK1 promotes LRR-RK-mediated PTI but is a negative regulator of LRR-RP-mediated PTI 9 . To identify RLCK-VII members with positive roles in LRR-RP-dependent PTI, we screened an Arabidopsis RLCK-VII transfer DNA mutant library 10 for ethylene production elicited by fungal pg13(At) 11 , oomycete nlp20 and bacterial eMax (which are recognized by RLP42, RLP23 and RLP1, respectively) 3 (Extended Data Fig. 1a). A pbl31 mutant was defective in response to these elicitors compared with wild-type plants (Columbia-0 (Col-0)) (Extended Data Fig. 1a). PBL31 belongs to RLCK-VII subfamily 7, together ...

No abstract

No abstract

Summary Pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) sense microbial patterns and activate innate immunity against attempted microbial invasions. The leucine‐rich repeat receptor kinases (LRR‐RK) FLS2 and EFR, and the LRR receptor protein (LRR‐RP) receptors RLP23 and RLP42, respectively, represent prototypical members of these two prominent and closely related PRR families. We conducted a survey of Arabidopsis thaliana immune signaling mediated by these receptors to address the question of commonalities and differences between LRR‐RK and LRR‐RP signaling. Quantitative differences in timing and amplitude were observed for several early immune responses, with RP‐mediated responses typically being slower and more prolonged than those mediated by RKs. Activation of RLP23, but not FLS2, induced the production of camalexin. Transcriptomic analysis revealed that RLP23‐regulated genes represent only a fraction of those genes differentially expressed upon FLS2 activation. Several positive and negative regulators of FLS2‐signaling play similar roles in RLP23 signaling. Intriguingly, the cytoplasmic receptor kinase BIK1, a positive regulator of RK signaling, acts as a negative regulator of RP‐type immune receptors in a manner dependent on BIK1 kinase activity. Our study unveiled unexpected differences in two closely related receptor systems and reports a new negative role of BIK1 in plant immunity.