Our pilot study suggests that HHHFNC maybe as effective as NIPPV in preventing endotracheal ventilation in the primary treatment of RDS in premature infants (<35 weeks GA and BW >1,000 g).

No abstract

with long and narrow tubing (CLNT) has gained increasing popularity for applying noninvasive respiratory support for newborn infants thanks to ease of use, perceived patient comfort, and reduced nasal trauma. However, there is concern that this interface delivers reduced and suboptimal support. OBJECTIVE To determine whether CLNT is noninferior to short binasal prongs and masks (SPM) when providing nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) in preterm infants.DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This randomized controlled, unblinded, prospective noninferiority trial was conducted between December 2017 and December 2019 at 2 tertiary neonatal intensive care units. Preterm infants born between 24 weeks' and 33 weeks and 6 days' gestation were eligible if presented with respiratory distress syndrome with the need for noninvasive ventilatory support either as initial treatment after birth or after first extubation. Analysis was performed by intention to treat.INTERVENTIONS Randomization to NIPPV with either CLNT or SPM interface. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURESThe primary outcome was the need for intubation within 72 hours after NIPPV treatment began. Noninferiority margin was defined as 15% or less absolute difference. RESULTSOverall, 166 infants were included in this analysis, and infant characteristics and clinical condition (including fraction of inspired oxygen, PCO 2 , and pH level) were comparable at recruitment in the CLNT group (n = 83) and SPM group (n = 83). The mean (SD) gestational age was 29.3 (2.2) weeks vs 29.2 (2.5) weeks, and the mean (SD) birth weight was 1237 (414) g vs 1254 (448) g in the CLNT and SPM groups, respectively. Intubation within 72 hours occurred in 12 of 83 infants (14%) in the CLNT group and in 15 of 83 infants (18%) in the SPM group (risk difference, −3.6%; 95% CI, −14.8 to 7.6 [within the noninferiority margin], χ 2 P = .53). Moderate to severe nasal trauma was significantly less common in the CLNT group compared with the SPM group (4 [5%] vs 14 [17%]; P = .01). There were no differences in other adverse events or in the course during hospitalization.CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this study, CLNT was noninferior to SPM in providing NIPPV for preterm infants, while causing significantly less nasal trauma.

Treatment for ulcerative colitis often requires the administration of immunosuppressive therapy. Shortly after rescue therapy with infliximab for acute severe colitis, a patient who was also taking corticosteroids, azathioprine and adalimumab became rapidly unwell with atypical pneumonia, which did not respond to conventional antimicrobials. Re-examining the travel history revealed a prior caving trip to Costa Rica. Dimorphic fungal serology was thus tested and a diagnosis of paracoccidioidomycosis was made. After a lengthy intensive care unit admission, the patient made a recovery after the administration of appropriate antifungal therapy and was discharged home on long-term oral antifungals.

Although its incidence is declining with the widespread use of intrapartum antibiotics, early-onset sepsis (EOS) continues to be associated with high morbidity and mortality. Maternal, infant, and peripartum risk factors, as well as infant's laboratory tests, have been used to try and identify asymptomatic newborns at risk. In this study, we reevaluate the management of newborns at risk for EOS by comparing our outcomes using two different approaches. Comparison of clinical data and outcomes of newborns at risk for EOS between two study periods, in which we have used two different protocols for their evaluation and management. Although outcomes were not different, adoption of the criteria suggested in the 2012 American Academy of Pediatrics guidelines in the second era resulted in increased utilization of diagnostic laboratory tests and increased use of empiric antibiotic treatments with less yield in a population with a low incidence of EOS (< 0.3/1,000 live births), such as ours. In asymptomatic newborns at risk for EOS, careful assessment of a set of maternal, infant, and peripartum risk factors and their severity combined with careful clinical observation, judicious use of laboratory evaluations, and empiric antibiotic treatment only in selected cases seem to be appropriate.