Objectives To describe hospital utilization and costs associated with preterm or low birth weight births (preterm/LBW) by payer prior to implementation of the Affordable Care Act and to identify areas for improvement in the quality of care received among preterm/LBW infants. Methods Hospital utilization—defined as mean length of stay (LOS, days), secondary diagnoses for birth hospitalizations, primary diagnoses for rehospitalizations, and transfer status—and costs were described among preterm/LBW infants using the 2009 Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Results Approximately 9.1 % of included hospitalizations (n = 4,167,900) were births among preterm/LBW infants; however, these birth hospitalizations accounted for 43.4 % of total costs. Rehospitalizations of all infants occurred at a rate of 5.9 % overall, but accounted for 22.6 % of total costs. This pattern was observed across all payer types. The prevalence of rehospitalizations was nearly twice as high among preterm/LBW infants covered by Medicaid (7.6 %) compared to commercially-insured infants (4.3 %). Neonatal transfers were more common among preterm/LBW infants whose deliveries and hospitalizations were covered by Medicaid (7.3 %) versus commercial insurance (6.5 %). Uninsured/self-pay preterm and LBW infants died in-hospital during the first year of life at a rate of 91 per 1000 discharges—nearly three times higher than preterm and LBW infants covered by either Medicaid (37 per 1000) or commercial insurance (32 per 1000). Conclusions When comparing preterm/LBW infants whose births were covered by Medicaid and commercial insurance, there were few differences in length of hospital stays and costs. However, opportunities for improvement within Medicaid and CHIP exist with regard to reducing rehospitalizations and neonatal transfers.
To read or post commentaries in response to this article, see it online at http://www.annfammed.org/content/15/1/6.
The use of health information technology (HIT) and health information management (HIM) to provide accurate and timely data to health care providers in poor rural and underserved areas is often seen as a means of optimizing quality of care, reducing medical errors, and reducing cost. 1−11 Research shows that HIT can be an expensive investment that yields minimal benefits if not carefully implemented and, as a result, those groups identified as priority populations may receive substandard care. 2,12−16 Health systems in rural areas have used HIM, HIT, and telehealth in multicomponent efforts to improve quality of care, access, and efficiency. Results include higher productivity and patient satisfaction rates, shorter hospital stays, lower readmission rates, trimmed medical costs, and improved control of chronic conditions. 6,17,18 These findings indicate that telehealth, HIM, and HIT can contribute to improvements in quality and population health in rural settings by monitoring patients, identifying high-risk patients, measuring clinical performance overall and for specific patient groups, and providing clinical decision support. 19 Telehealth, HIM, and HIT applications can also improve access to timely, high-quality care.
Seasonal influenza requires appropriate management to protect public health and resources. Decreasing the burden of influenza will depend primarily on increasing vaccination rates as well as prompt initiation of antiviral therapy within 48 hours of symptom onset, especially in the context of the current COVID-19 pandemic. A careful approach is required to prevent health services from being overwhelmed by a surge in demand that could exceed capacity. This review highlights the societal burden of influenza and discusses the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of influenza as a complicating addition to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic. The importance of vaccination for seasonal influenza and the role of antiviral therapy in the treatment and prophylaxis of seasonal influenza, including the most up-to-date recommendations from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for influenza management, will also be reviewed.
Introduction: Patient satisfaction is a key indicator of health care value and an increasingly important metric used to assess emergency physician performance and often reimbursement. To our knowledge, there is no standardized curriculum within emergency medicine (EM) residency programs that focuses on the patient experience in EM. Methods: Our novel resident curriculum is an organized approach to enhancing patient-centered care by optimizing the patient experience. It spans the academic year, with key topics organized into a quarterly time line. Topics include physician courtesy and respect, pain management, discussion of diagnostic and therapeutic interventions, timely communication, and delivery of quality care. Each quarter has three components: introduction/didactics, an interactive workshop, and stories and reflection. The instructional methods used include didactic lectures, role-playing, and group reflection and storytelling. Results: Of 44 participants, 54.5% completed a preintervention survey, and 45.5% completed a postintervention survey. The surveys consisted of 5-point Likert scales measuring degree of agreement with statements that reflected desired behaviors and/or attitudes. On the postintervention survey, participants gave scores indicating general agreement with desired behaviors including sitting at the bedside, acknowledging all persons in the room, and giving an anticipated disposition, as well as with feeling more knowledgeable about patient satisfaction. Discussion: Our Satisfaction Academy has filled a significant gap related to enhancing the patient experience. This curriculum is generalizable to other EM residency programs, and the interactive peer-to-peer format is both engaging and customizable.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.