Background Soft tissue reaction to dental implant abutments influences the sustainability of restoration. Several abutment materials, such as titanium and gold alloy, have been introduced for strength and esthetic solutions. Zirconia and titanium‐base abutments have also become popular in recent years due to high esthetic demands. Purpose To investigate the immune cell infiltration into the soft tissue in response to different abutment materials. Materials and Methods Twenty dental implants were placed in the posterior regions of 17 patients. Titanium, zirconia, gold alloy, and titanium‐base were randomly selected for each patient on the day of surgery. After 8 weeks of healing, the abutments were removed along with 1 mm of peri‐implant soft tissue. Immunohistochemical assessment was performed using labeled streptavidin‐biotin to identify T cells, B cells, macrophages, plasma cells, and microvascular infiltration. Results Gold alloy demonstrated an overall higher inflammatory cell infiltration and highest number of CD3+, CD20+, and CD 68+ cells (P value <.05). The number of plasma cell and new microvascular infiltrations among abutment materials was not significantly different. Conclusion Titanium, titanium‐base, and zirconia abutments showed comparable infiltration profiles; gold alloy abutments showed the highest B‐cell, T cell, and macrophage infiltration. None of the abutment materials caused clinical inflammation; hence, they can be effectively used.
Objective. To investigate the effect of different post materials and adaptability on fracture resistance and fracture mode of endodontically treated teeth. Materials and Methods. Sixty extracted human mandibular premolars were selected and divided into 6 groups (n = 10) according to the restorative method after endodontic treatment: no ferrule presented and restored without fiber post (Group C), 2.0 mm ferrule presented and restored without fiber post (Group CF), restored with D.T. Light-Post (Group PDT), restored with anatomically customized D.T. Light-Post, relined with resin composite (Group ADT), restored with Hi-Rem prosthetic post (Group PHR), and restored with anatomically customized Hi-Rem prosthetic post, relined with resin composite (Group AHR). After restoring with core build-up materials, all specimens were loaded at 45° in a universal testing machine until failure. Visual inspection of all specimens for fracture modes was performed. The data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA, and the fracture mode was reviewed using the chi-square test. Results. Anatomically customized groups presented statistically significant higher fracture resistance than prefabricated groups and group C ( P < 0.05 ). Without post, group CF displayed significantly higher fracture resistance than group C ( P < 0.05 ). Group C, CF, PDT, and PHR showed some specimens with unfavorable fractures. Conclusions. Anatomically customized posts presented highest fracture resistance among all groups. There was no significant difference in fracture mode across all groups.
Introduction: There are several factors that greatly influence implant stability with implant design being a paramount factor; however, few studies investigate its impact.Aim: To investigate the implant stability in relation to two different implant designs, a cylindrical shaped single-threaded design (CS/ST) and a tapered shaped doublethreaded design (TS/DT) using resonance frequency analysis over the first 8 weeks after implantation.Materials and Methods: Twenty-eight implants were randomly allocated using computer-generated random numbers into two groups and were placed as single tooth implant in the posterior arch in human jaw as specimens. iCAT™ CBCT scan (Hatfield, PA) was used to determine the bone density according to Misch's Bone classification. The osseotomy sites were prepared and implants were placed with guided surgical template by inexperienced surgeons which were prepared with the same implant planning software (3shape ® implant studio). The implant stability was measured using the resonance frequency analysis Osstell ® ISQ (Osstell AB, Sweden) on the implant level over the first 8 weeks at three different time intervals. A mean implant stability quotient (ISQ) value was recorded at each measurement time points.The first ISQ of each implant recorded at the time of implant placement were considered as baseline and were the so-called primary stability.Results: All 28 dental implants were analyzed. A similar pattern of implant stability changes was observed in both implant designs. A significant decreased was found at the first 4 weeks after implantation (p < 0.05) before ascending to maximum cumulative stability by the eighth week (p < 0.05). Between the two groups, TS/DT group had a higher mean ISQ values than that of the CS/ST group at all three observation periods but did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.69). Regarding different types of bone, TS/DT showed a significant difference in mean ISQ values in D4 bone. To date, all 28 implants are in function with no failure/and or complications. Conclusions:The difference in implant design did not significantly influence the implant stability. TS/DT shows superiority over CS/ST when placed in D4 bone and
Purpose: The shear bond strength of conventional zirconia (3Y-TZP), translucent zirconia (5Y-PSZ), and titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V) thermocycled using different phosphate monomer resin cements were investigated. Methods: In this study, 120 specimens of 3Y-TZP, 5Y-PSZ, and Ti6Al4V were cemented to nanocomposite resin cylinders using PANAVIA™ V5 and Rely X™ U200. The bond area and resin cement thickness were controlled as per ISO 29022:2013 and 4049:2009. Each resin cement group was used with/without the Clearfil ceramic primer plus. The shear bond strength of the 12 groups was statistically analyzed using two and one-way ANOVA to determine the properties of the different materials and resin cements (α = 0.05). The mode of failure was observed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS). Results: The titanium alloy groups showed better shear bond strength than the zirconia groups (p < 0.05). PANAVIA™ V5 without primer showed significantly lower shear bond strength than other cements in zirconia and titanium alloy specimens (p < 0.05). Titanium alloy with Rely X™ U200 with a Clearfil ceramic primer plus showed the highest shear bond strength (6.37 ± 1.60 MPa). SEM images showed mixed failures in zirconia groups and cohesive failures in titanium alloy groups. Conclusions: The titanium alloy showed better shear bond strength than zirconia when the Clearfil ceramic primer plus was used. The primer solution containing MDP and resin cement with phosphoric methacrylate ester showed similar shear bond strength with 3Y-TZP and 5Y-PSZ. The resin cement without phosphate monomers demonstrated the least shear bond strength.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.