air and organic electrolytes. [1c,e,7] Furthermore, the cost of Mg metal is 30 times lower than that of Li. [8] Therefore, magnesium-sulfur (Mg-S) batteries theoretically offer a higher volumetric energy density, greater safety, and much lower cost than Li-S batteries.The development of Mg-S batteries is still in its infancy and is limited by several challenges, including high cell polarization, low capacity, and rapid capacity fading. One of the most critical challenges is the high cell polarization (>1000 mV overpotential), [8,9] which has been widely attributed to the sluggish kinetics and passivation of Mg anodes. [9a,10] Substantial effort has been made to develop electrolytes that allow fast and reversible electroplating/stripping of divalent magnesium and are compatible with sulfur cathodes. [1e,7] Commonly used chloride-and boron-based electrolytes have successfully reduced the polarization potential of Mg electroplating/stripping to ≈200 mV. However, the overpotential of Mg-S cells is still high (>1000 mV in chloride-based electrolytes [6a,7,11] and ≈600 mV in boron-based electrolytes [12] ), leading to low energy efficiency (≈47% in chloride-based electrolytes and ≈56% in boron-based electrolytes). Other challenges such as low capacity and rapid capacity fading have been attributed to the loss of soluble polysulfide. [7,13] Sulfur reactions in Mg-S batteries are reported to follow similar reaction pathways with that in Li-S batteries. During discharge, the elemental sulfur is reduced to soluble polysulfides, first to long-chain polysulfides followed by short-chain polysulfides via chain-shortening reactions. The short-chain polysulfides subsequently reduce to solid sulfide and precipitates onto the cathode. Meanwhile, part of the polysulfides could diffuse to the anode, resulting in irreversible loss. [6b,13d,14] Consequently, similar to Li-S batteries, addressing the loss of polysulfides is considered the priority in Mg-S batteries. To overcome these challenges, interlayer and host materials [13a,15] have been designed according to the strategies developed for Li-S batteries. [16] These approaches increase the first discharge capacity to ≈1000 mAh g −1 below 0.1 C, which is lower than that of Li-S batteries (1400-1600 mAh g −1 at a C rate of ≥0.1 C). Despite considerable efforts, the performance of Mg-S cells is still far from satisfactory, which raises the question of what truly limits the reversibility of Mg-S batteries.In this work, we reveal that the sluggish sulfur reaction is the main origin of poor Mg-S cell performance. Exploiting Magnesium-sulfur batteries promise a higher theoretical volumetric energy density, improved safety, and lower cost compared to lithium-sulfur batteries. However, Mg-S batteries suffer from poor cycle life and low energy efficiency. Here, it is revealed that Mg-S reactions are dominated by "solid-solid" reactions due to much lower polysulfide solubility in the presence of Mg 2+ compared to that of Li + in 1,2-dimethoxyethane (DME)-based electrolyte, leading ...