Using a generalized scheme of multiple traps, thermoluminescence (TL) glow curves are calculated for different sets of systems parameters. In particular, the conditions under which glow peaks of first-order kinetics are produced are highlighted. The major findings and conclusions are as follows. (1) In the generalized scheme the glow peaks always reduce to first order at low trap occupancies. It is therefore suggested that the peak analysis to determine the parameters should be carried out only at low doses. (2) Glow peaks which follow first-order kinetics can be obtained irrespective of whether the recombination rate is faster, equal to or slower than the retrapping rate (Rret). (3) Quasi-equilibrium (QE) of free carriers in the delocalized band, which is the essential condition for the derivation of the conventional analytical expressions of TL and thermally stimulated conductivity, can be realized irrespective of whether RrecRret. (4) The realization of the QE condition depends on the concentrations of the traps and the recombination centres (RCs) and their cross sections for free carrier capture. It is discussed and shown that, in doped insulating and semiconducting materials, the values of these parameters are sufficiently high for the QE condition to be comfortably held. It is thus concluded that the doubts raised by earlier workers regarding the validity of the QE assumption in the derivation of the analytical expressions are unnecessary as far as these materials are concerned. (5) It is shown that a system in which some of the untrapped charge carriers recombine within the germinate centres and some become delocalized may satisfactorily explain the mechanism of TL emission in most of the phosphors. The properties of first-order, supralinearity and pre-dose sensitization may be easily explained under the framework of this system. (6) Conclusions (2) and (3) above disprove those of earlier workers who had concluded that QE and fast retrapping together do not form a consistent set of conditions and that the apparent dominance of first-order kinetics in nature is due to slow retrapping.

No abstract

Strong doubts havc been expressed about the validity of the quasi-equilibrium (QE) assumption used in the derivation of the analytical expressions of thermoluminescence (TL). So far there is no established method available to check if QE actually prevails during the emission of an experimental TL signal. The present study shows that the level of QE changes with a change in the heating rate beta. The change in the level of QE in its turn gets reflected in a change in peak shape when the system turns to a non-QE condition. This property is used as the first ever experimental method to test whether or not the emission of a given glow peak occurs under the QE condition. An essential condition for holding the QE condition is found to be T(R)/taum> or = 10(-3) where T(R) and taum are the glow peak recording duration and the maximum value of the free carrier lifetime, respectively. This relation between T(R) and taum is useful in finding the approximate value of taum. The value of taum being a function of the concentration and cross section of the TL related centres, one may be able to assess these basic parameters from the study of TL glow curves. The theoretical results are discussed in the perspective of LiF (TLD-100).

Non-first order (FO) kinetics models are of three types; second order (SO), general order (GO) and mixed order (MO). It is shown that all three of these have constraints in their energy level schemes and their applicable parameter values. In nature such restrictions are not expected to exist. The thermoluminescence (TL) glow peaks produced by these models shift their position and change their shape as the trap occupancies change. Such characteristics are very unlike those found in samples of real materials. In these models, in general, retrapping predominates over recombination. It is shown that the quasi-equilibrium (QE) assumption implied in the derivation of the TL equation of these models is quite valid, thus disproving earlier workers' conclusion that QE cannot be held under retrapping dominant conditions. However notwithstanding their validity, they suffer from the shortcomings as stated above and have certain lacunae. For example, the kinetic order (KO) parameter and the pre-exponential factor which are assumed to be the constant parameters of the GO kinetics expression turn out to be variables when this expression is applied to plausible physical models. Further, in glow peak characterization using the GO expression, the quality of fit is found to deteriorate when the best fitted value of KO parameter is different from 1 and 2. This means that the found value of the basic parameter, namely the activation energy, becomes subject to error. In the MO kinetics model, the value of the KO parameter α would change with dose, and thus in this model also, as in the GO model, no single value of KO can be assigned to a given glow peak. The paper discusses TL of real materials having characteristics typically like those of FO kinetics. Theoretically too, a plausible physical model of TL emission produces glow peaks which have characteristics of FO kinetics under a wide variety of parametric combinations. In the background of the above findings, it is suggested that the kinetics analysis of the TL glow curves should be carried out straightforwardly assuming FO kinetics.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

The general order kinetics expression of thermoluminescence (TL) contains two empirical parameters, namely the kinetics order (KO) and the pre-exponential factor (PF). In this paper thermoluminescence glow curves are calculated by assuming well defined physically meaningful models and the KO and the PF values applicable to these glow curves are calculated. The approaches used to find these values are either analytical or based on the shape of the glow curves or their isothermal decay behaviour depending on the type of the model used. The results show that the KO and the PF parameters are in general not constant for a given glow peak. They vary with the change in occupancy of the traps except under the two limiting conditions, namely KO equal to 1 or 2. This means that, when the KO of a given glow peak is not equal to either 1 or 2, its numerical value as well as that of the PF would depend on the sample dose. It also means that these parameters change continuously when the glow curve is being recorded. At very low trap occupancies these parameters approach limiting values. For the simple one-trap model this limiting value of KO is 2 whereas that for a multi-trap model is 1. The corresponding changes in the quantitative values of the PF are by large orders of magnitude and the variation is in the direction opposite to that of the KO. Furthermore, the dimensions for the PF also change. These results bring the general order kinetics approach into conflict with the physical models used to describe the TL glow curves. Implications of these theoretical results for experimental observations are discussed.