Introduction: Appropriately managing mental disorders is a growing priority across countries in view of the impact on morbidity and mortality. This includes patients with bipolar disorders (BD). Management of BD is a concern as this is a complex disease with often misdiagnosis, which is a major issue in lower and middleincome countries (LMICs) with typically a limited number of trained personnel and resources. This needs to be addressed. Areas covered: Medicines are the cornerstone of managing patients with Bipolar II across countries including LMICs. The choice of medicines, especially antipsychotics, is important in LMICs with high rates of diabetes and HIV. However, care is currently compromised in LMICs by issues such as the stigma, cultural beliefs, a limited number of trained professionals and high patient co-payments. Expert opinion: Encouragingly, some LMICs have introduced guidelines for patients with BD; however, this is very variable. Strategies for the future include addressing the lack of national guidelines for patients with BD, improving resources for mental disorders including personnel, improving medicine availability and patients' rights, and monitoring prescribing against agreed guidelines. A number of strategies have been identified to improve the treatment of patients with Bipolar II in LMICs, and will be followed up.
BackgroundSchizophrenia is associated with significant economic burden. In Brazil, antipsychotic drugs and outpatient and hospital services are provided by the Brazilian National Health System (SUS) for patients with schizophrenia. However, few studies capture the cost of managing these patients within the Brazilian NHS. This is important to appraise different management approaches within universal healthcare systems.ObjectiveOur objective was to use real-world data to describe the costs associated with the treatment of schizophrenia in adults receiving atypical antipsychotics in Brazil from 2000 to 2010.MethodsWe integrated three national databases for adult patients with schizophrenia receiving one or more atypical antipsychotics. We assessed only direct medical costs and the study was conducted from a public-payer perspective. A multivariate log-linear regression model was performed to evaluate associations between costs and clinical and demographic variables.ResultsWe identified 174,310 patients with schizophrenia, with mean ± standard deviation (SD) annual costs of $US1811.92 ± 284.39 per patient. Atypical antipsychotics accounted for 79.7% of total costs, with a mean annual cost per patient of $US1578.74 ± 240.40. Mean annual costs per patient were $US2482.90 ± 302.92 for psychiatric hospitalization and $US862.96 ± 160.18 for outpatient psychiatric care. Olanzapine was used by 47.7% of patients and represented 62.8% of the total costs of atypical antipsychotics. Patients who used clozapine had the highest mean annual cost per patient for outpatient psychiatric care and psychiatric hospitalization.ConclusionsAtypical antipsychotics were responsible for the majority of the schizophrenia treatment costs, and psychiatric hospitalization costs were the highest mean annual cost per patient. Authorities should ensure efficient use of atypical antipsychotics and encourage outpatient psychiatric care over psychiatric hospitalization where possible.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1007/s40258-018-0408-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
The maintenance of patients with renal transplant typically involves two or more drugs to prevent rejection and prolong graft survival. The calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) are the most commonly recommended medicines in combinations with others. While immunosuppressive treatment regimens are well established, there is insufficient long-term effectiveness data to help guide future management decisions. The study analyzes the effectiveness of treatment regimens containing CNI after renal transplantation during 16 years of follow-up with real-world data from the Brazilian National Health System (SUS). This was a retrospective study of 2318 SUS patients after renal transplantion. Patients were propensity score-matched (1:1) by sex, age, type and year of transplantation. Kaplan–Meier analysis was used to estimate the cumulative probabilities of survival. A Cox proportional hazard model was used to evaluate factors associated with progression to graft loss. Multivariable analysis, adjusted for diabetes mellitus and race/color, showed a greater risk of graft loss for patients using tacrolimus plus mycophenolate compared to patients treated with cyclosporine plus azathioprine. In conclusion, this Brazilian real-world study, with a long follow-up period using matched analysis for relevant clinical features and the representativeness of the sample, demonstrated improved long-term effectiveness for therapeutic regimens containing cyclosporine plus azathioprine. Consequently, we recommend that protocols and clinical guidelines for renal transplantation should consider the cyclosporine plus azathioprine regimen as a potential first line option, along with others.
Introduction: Antipsychotics are widely prescribed for patients with schizophrenia. The Brazilian public health system provides these patients free of charge to patients and it is pertinent to evaluate their benefits. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of olanzapine and risperidone in the treatment of patients with schizophrenia in the real world and assessing risk factors for their discontinuation through a national non-concurrent cohort with 16 years of followup. Methods: Three SUS administrative databases were integrated by deterministicprobabilistic linkage. After, patients were matched (1:1) for psychiatric hospitalization, year of receiving the antipsychotic, sex and age, considering either olanzapine or risperidone at study entry. Kaplan-Meier was used to estimate the cumulative probabilities of discontinuation of treatment and associated factors were identified. Sensitivity analyzes were performed. Results: 3416 pairs of patients were included. Olanzapine had a longer time until discontinuation of treatment (p = 0.021), and risperidone had a higher risk of discontinuation (p = 0.021). Among patients persistent for at least 24 months, there was no statistically significant difference. Conclusion: Olanzapine demonstrated superior real-world effectiveness over risperidone, in terms of survival and psychiatric hospitalization. This superiority was not sustained in all analyzes.
Introduction:Renal transplantation is considered a cost-effective treatment compared to dialysis and represents a significant percentage of public health resources. Post-transplant treatment requires the use of three immunosuppressive drugs. The immunosuppressive regimens consists of a corticosteroid, a calcineurin inhibitor (cyclosporine or tacrolimus) and an antiproliferative agent (azathioprine or mycophenolate) and also by sirolimus or everolimus. In Brazil, the Unified Health System (as known as Sistema Único de Saúde - SUS) is responsible for 95 percent of all kidney transplants performed, as well as ensuring access to immunosuppressive drugs. Therefore, there is a huge and growing economic impact caused by the distribution of these drugs in SUS. We evaluated the factors associated with kidney graft loss in patients who received deceased donor organ and used maintenance immunosuppressive regimens in SUS, in fifteen years.Methods:We analyzed a nationwide cohort of kidney transplant recipients from January 2000 to December 2015 developed through deterministic-probabilistic linkage of SUS administrative databases: Hospital Information System (SIH/SUS); Subsystem for High Complexity Procedures (SIA/SUS) and the Mortality Information System (SIM). Graft loss was defined as death or dialysis for more than three months. All regimens included corticosteroid. We used Cox proportional hazards model to evaluate the factors associated with progression to graft loss.Results:In total, 18,333 patients were included; 58.5 percent used tracolimus+mycophenolate, 11.7 percent cyclosporine+mycophenolate, 8.9 percent tacrolimus+azathyoprine, 5.5 percent cyclosporine+azathyoprine and 15.4 percent received other immunosuppressive regimens (sirolimus+mycophenolate, everolimus+mycophenolate, tacrolimus, mycophenolate, cyclosporine, azathyoprine) . Most patients were male with a median age of 46 years. A higher risk of graft loss was associated with the use of tracolimus+mycophenolate (HR = 1.069; 95% CI, 0.999–1.146), sirolimus+mycophenolate (HR1.395;95% CI, 1 .150–1.692), tracolimus (monotherapy) (1.468;1.239–1.739); mycophenolate (monotherapy) (1.297;1.126–1.493), male gender (1.144; 1.072–1.221), an additional year of age (1.010; 1.007–1.013), a median dialysis period greater than 38 months (1.266; 1.182–1.356), a diagnosis of diabetes (1.211; 1.071–1.367) and a diagnosis of arterial hypertension (1.209; 1.134–1.288) (HR=1.468;95% CI,1.239 −1.739); mycophenolate (monotherapy) (HR = 1.297; 95% CI, 1.126–1.493), male gender (HR = 1.144; 95% CI 1.072–1.221), an additional year of age (HR = 1.010; 95% CI, 1.007–1.013), a median dialysis period greater than 38 months (HR = 1.266; 95% CI, 1.182–1.356), a diagnosis of diabetes (HR = 1.211; 95% CI, 1.071–1.367) and a diagnosis of arterial hypertension (HR = 1.209; 95% CI, 1.134–1.288)as the primary cause of chronic kidney disease.Conclusions:In Brazil, the use of regimens mycophenolate, tacrolimus, tacrolimus+mycophenolate was associated a higher risk of graft loss, among other factors. The choice of drug therapy is one of the few factors that influence survival amenable to direct action by health professionals. Therefore, the results of this study are important and should be disseminated aiming to better outcomes for kidney transplant patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
334 Leonard St
Brooklyn, NY 11211
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.