The physicochemical and hydration properties of mechanically modified flax fibers (FFs) were investigated herein. Raw flax fibers (FF-R) were ball-milled and sieved through mesh with various aperture sizes (420, 210, and 125 μm) to achieve modified samples, denoted as FF-420, FF-210, and FF-125, respectively. The physicochemical and hydration properties of FF-R with variable particle sizes were characterized using several complementary techniques: microscopy (SEM), spectroscopy (FT-IR, XRD, and XPS), thermoanalytical methods (DSC and TGA), adsorption isotherms using gas/dye probes, and solvent swelling studies in liquid H 2 O. The hydration of FF biomass is governed by the micropore structure and availability of active surface sites, as revealed by the adsorption isotherm results and the TGA/DSC profiles of the hydrated samples. Gravimetric water swelling, water retention values, and vapor adsorption results provide further support that particle size reduction of FF-R upon milling parallels the changes in surface chemical and physicochemical properties relevant to adsorption/hydration in the modified FF materials. This study outlines a facile strategy for the valorization and tuning of the physicochemical properties of agricultural FF biomass via mechanical treatment for diverse applications in biomedicine, energy recovery, food, and biosorbents for environmental remediation.
The role of chemical modification of pristine linen fiber (LF) on its physicochemical and adsorption properties is reported in this contribution. The surface and textural properties of the pristine LF and its peroxyacetic acid- (PAF) and chlorite-treated (CF) fiber forms were characterized by several complementary methods: spectroscopy (SEM, TEM, FT-IR, and XPS), thermal analysis (DSC and TGA), gas/water adsorption isotherms, and zeta potential (ξ). The results obtained reveal that the surface charge and textural properties (surface area and pore structure) of the LF material was modified upon chemical treatment, as indicated by changes in the biomass composition, morphology, ξ-values, and water/dye uptake properties of the fiber samples. Particularly, the pristine LF sample displays preferential removal efficiency (ER) of methylene blue (MB) dye with ER ~3-fold greater (ER~62%) as compared to the modified materials (CF or PAF; ER~21%), due to the role of surface charge of pectins and lignins present in pristine LF. At higher MB concentration, the relative ER values for LF (~19%) relative to CF or PAF (~16%) reveal the greater role of micropore adsorption sites due to the contributing effect of the textural porosity observed for the modified flax biomass at these conditions. Similar trends occur for the adsorption of water in the liquid vs. vapour phases. The chemical treatment of LF alters the polarity/charge of the surface functional groups, and pore structure properties of the chemically treated fibers, according to the variable hydration properties. The surface and textural properties of LF are altered upon chemical modification, according to the variable adsorption properties with liquid water (l) vs. water vapor (g) due to the role of surface- vs. pore-sites. This study contributes to an understanding of the structure-adsorption properties for pristine and oxidized flax fiber biomass. The chemical conversion of such biomass yields biomaterials with tunable surface and textural properties, as evidenced by the unique adsorption properties observed for pristine LF and its modified forms (CF and PAF). This study addresses knowledge gaps in the field by contributing insight on the relationship between structure and adsorption properties of such LF biomass in its pristine and chemically modified forms.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.