printing of pelvic fracture urethral injuries-fusion of technology and urethroplasty.
A total of 191 patients were evaluated at our department for azoospermia, and 11 were found to have azoospermia due to ejaculatory duct obstruction as proved by normal serum hormones, normal testicular biopsy, low ejaculate volume and absence of fructose in semen. Also transrectal ultrasound was performed, revealing distended seminal vesicles and dilated ejaculatory ducts. All these criteria together suggested ejaculatory duct obstruction as a cause of azoospermia. All patients underwent endoscopic management for treatment of their ejaculatory duct obstruction in the form of resection and/or incision of the ejaculatory duct ostium inside the urethra and patency was checked intraoperatively by injection of sterile methylene blue in the vas and visualizing the efflux of the blue dye endoscopically. Intraoperative patency was documented in 10 patients and postoperative patency by follow-up semen analysis in 7 patients (70% patency rate) of which 2 (20% pregnancy rate) were able to conceive within 2 years of endoscopic treatment. Postoperative complications included acute urinary retention in 1 patient, haematuria in 5 and recurrent epididymitis in 2 patients.
Objectives The purpose of this study is to compare results, safety and outcome of ultra-mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) versus stented shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) for the management of renal calculi sized 10–20 mm. Methods This study was conducted at Urology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University. After meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria, 90 patients were randomized to either ultra-mini-PCNL group or stented SWL group through the closed-envelope technique, with 45 patients in each group. Patient data were collected preoperatively, immediately postoperatively and 2 and 4 weeks postoperatively assessing operative time, hospital stay, complications including haematuria, fever, the need for blood transfusion, residual stones and the need for retreatment. Results Stone-free rate (SFR) was higher in the ultra-mini-PCNL group compared to the stented SWL group, with no statistically significant difference with P -value = 0.316. As for the need for retreatment, it was slightly higher in the stented SWL group compared to the ultra-mini-PCNL group, yet this difference was statistically insignificant with P -value = 0.681. We found no statistically significant difference between both groups regarding post-operative complications including fever, haematuria and need for blood transfusion, respectively. Operative time and hospital stay were significantly higher in the ultra-mini-PCNL group compared to the stented SWL group with P -value < 0.001 for both. Conclusion Both stented SWL and ultra-mini-PCNL are good treatment choices for renal stones sized less than 2 cm with low complication rates. Stone size indices were significant predictor for the need for retreatment. Further studies to compare SFR based on stone size in both interventions are needed.
Background Current options for ureteral stones include medical treatment, extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL), and various endoscopic procedures, with the standard open ureterolithotomy being less frequently practiced nowadays. The use of laparoscopy in the management of ureteral stones was one of the earliest applications of laparoscopy in urology, the first report being made by Wickham in 1979. Objective To compare the laparoscopic Retroperitoneal ureterolithotomy with the Laparoscopic Transperitoneal ureterolithotomy as a better alternative to conventional open surgery to extract a large, impacted and hard stones at the proximal two thirds of the ureter. Methods In this study we present our experience with laparoscopic ureterolithotomy comparing both transperitoneal approach and retroperitoneal approach through a retrospective randomized comparative study that conducted on 50 patients admitted through the outpatient clinic of Urology in Ain shams University Hospitals and Nasser institute hospital. The 50 patients divided into two groups each one was 25 patients, first group was performed by the laparoscopic transperitoneal approach and the other group by the laparoscopic retroperitoneal approach Between October 2017 and October 2018. Results This study revealed that the length of the Hospitalization period and the duration of drainage and urethral catheter were shorter in the transperitoneal approach than in the retroperitoneal approach with statistical significance between the groups. In the present study, the mean time to oral intake was significantly shorter in the Retroperitoneal group than in the Transperitoneal group. This is due to the mobilization of the colon, dissection and retraction of the viscera, and blood and urine leak in the peritoneal cavity, causing intestinal movements and sounds to be more delayed in the LTU group. In contrast, the lost blood during the retroperitoneal procedure does not come into contact with the bowel, and if urine leakage occurs, it would be contained within the retroperitoneal space. Also we find that both approaches are safe with few complications that were significantly wider at the transperitoneal group; vascular injury didn’t occur at any of the cases with no need for blood transfusion. Conclusion Through our study we concluded that Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy is technically feasible and safe and both of its two approaches either transperitoneal or retroperitoneal are successful procedures with a success rate nearly the same in both techniques, but and based on our results through this study, we recommend the retroperitoneal approach for laparoscpic extraction of the ureteral stones due to the fact that it has the least operative time than the transperitoneal approach, getting rid of the all stone burden, lower rate of complications and a better postoperative recovery.
Background : urethral stricture is one of the most difficult urological problems to cure adequately and is know to mankind since ages as it has been documented in ancient literature of Egyptians and Greeks. Aim of the work: the aim of our study is to evaluate and compare the outcomes of Ho:YAG laser urethrotomy with the conventional cold knife technique as regards treatment outcome, efficacy and complications Patients and methods: A total of 20 male patients presented to the urology department at El Maadi military hospital and Ain shams university hospitals diagnosed as urethral stricture requiring optical internal urethrotomy were included in this study. Patients were randomized into two groups : In group A (holmium group): 10 patients underwent internal urethrotomy with Holmium laser. In group B (cold knife group) 10 patients underwent internal urethrotomy with cold knife. Results: based upon uroflowmetry, assessment of treatment effectiveness and complications were made at 3 months follow-up. Post operative fall in the peak flow rate was noted during the follow up in both groups, but was highter fall in the holmium group than the cold knife group at the end of the third month.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.