No abstract

Guidelines and recommendations developed and/or endorsed by the American

Objective To determine the efficacy of anakinra (recombinant interleukin-1 receptor antagonist) in improving 28-day survival in sepsis patients with features of macrophage activation syndrome (MAS). Despite equivocal results in sepsis trials, anakinra is effective in treating MAS, a similar entity with fever, disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), hepatobiliary dysfunction (HBD), cytopenias, and hyperferritinemia. Hence, sepsis patients with MAS features may benefit from IL-1 receptor blockade. Design Re-analysis of de-identified data from the phase III randomized interleukin-1 receptor antagonist trial in severe sepsis (Opal, et. al. Crit Care Med. 1997 Jul;25(7):1115–24). Setting Multi-center study recruiting through 91 centers from 11 countries in Europe and North America. Participants Sepsis patients with MODS and/or shock (original study) were re-grouped based on presence or absence of concurrent HBD and DIC as features of MAS (HBD/DIC group). The “non-HBD/DIC” group included patients with only HBD, only DIC or neither. Intervention Treatment with anakinra or placebo. Main Outcome(s) and Measure(s) 28-day mortality. Statistical analysis descriptive statistics, chi-square, ANOVA, logistic and Cox regression. Results Data were available for 763 adults from the original study cohort, randomized to receive either anakinra or placebo. Concurrent HBD/DIC was noted in 43 patients (5.6% of total, ages 18–75; 47% women). The 28-day survival was similar in both anakinra and placebo-treated non-HBD/DIC patients (71.4% vs. 70.8%, p=.88). Treatment with anakinra was associated with significant improvement in the 28-day survival rate in HBD/DIC patients (65.4% anakinra vs. 35.3% placebo), with HR for death 0.28 (0.11–0.71, p = 0.0071) for the treatment group in Cox regression. Conclusions and Relevance In this subgroup analysis, IL-1 receptor blockade was associated with significant improvement in survival of patients with sepsis and concurrent HBD/DIC. A prospective randomized trial using features of MAS for mortality risk stratification should be undertaken to confirm the role of IL-1 blockage.

ObjectiveTo compare the performance characteristics of cell-bound complement (C4d) activation products (CBCAPS) on erythrocyte (EC4d) and B cells (BC4d) with antibodies to double-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) and complement C3 and C4 in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).MethodsThe study enrolled 794 subjects consisting of 304 SLE and a control group consisting of 285 patients with other rheumatic diseases and 205 normal individuals. Anti-dsDNA and other autoantibodies were measured using solid-phase immunoassays while EC4d and BC4d were determined using flow cytometry. Complement proteins were determined using immunoturbidimetry. Disease activity in SLE was determined using a non-serological Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index SELENA Modification. A two-tiered methodology combining CBCAPS with autoantibodies to cellular and citrullinated antigens was also developed. Statistical analyses used area under receiver operating characteristic curves and calculations of area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity and specificity.ResultsAUC for EC4d (0.82±0.02) and BC4d (0.84±0.02) was higher than those yielded by C3 (0.73±0.02) and C4 (0.72±0.02) (p<0.01). AUC for CBCAPS was also higher than the AUC yielded by anti-dsDNA (0.79±0.02), but significance was only achieved for BC4d (p<0.01). The combination of EC4d and BC4d in multivariate testing methodology with anti-dsDNA and autoantibodies to cellular and citrullinated antigens yielded 80% sensitivity for SLE and specificity ranging from 70% (Sjogren's syndrome) to 92% (rheumatoid arthritis) (98% vs. normal). A higher proportion of patients with SLE with higher levels of disease activity tested positive for elevated CBCAPS, reduced complement and anti-dsDNA (p<0.03).ConclusionsCBCAPS have higher sensitivity than standard complement and anti-dsDNA measurements, and may help with the differential diagnosis of SLE in combination with other autoantibodies.

Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of a 24-week course of abatacept in the treatment of active lupus nephritis. An additional exploratory objective was to assess the potential of abatacept to induce ‘clinical tolerance’, defined as sustained clinical quiescence of lupus nephritis after discontinuation of immunosuppressive therapy. Methods Patients (n=134) with active lupus nephritis were studied in a randomized, double-blind phase II add-on trial in which they received either abatacept or placebo in conjunction with the Euro-Lupus regimen of low-dose cyclophosphamide followed by azathioprine. The primary efficacy outcome was the frequency of complete response (CR) at week 24. Thereafter, patients who met either complete or partial response criteria continued blinded treatment through week 52. During this phase of the study, subjects in the abatacept treatment group who had achieved CR status at week 24 discontinued immunosuppressive therapy other than prednisone (10 mg/d). Results There were no statistically significant differences between groups with respect to the primary outcome or any of the secondary outcomes, including measures of safety. Thirty-three percent of subjects in the treatment group and 31% of subjects in the control group achieved CR status at week 24. Fifty percent of subjects in the treatment group who met CR criteria and therefore discontinued immunosuppressive therapy at week 24 maintained their CR status through week 52. Conclusion The addition of abatacept to a regimen of cyclophosphamide followed by azathioprine did not improve the outcome of lupus nephritis at either 24 or 52 weeks. No worrisome safety signals were encountered.