Field experiments were conducted during 1998 to 2000 to determine the response of commercial potato cultivars and advanced breeding lines (ABL) differing in susceptibility to foliar late blight (caused by Phytophthora infestans) to reduced rates and frequencies of residual, contact fungicide applications. When environmental conditions were most favorable for the development of late blight, the lowest application rate of the fungicides chlorothalonil or fluazinam (33% of the manufacturers' recommended application rate [MRAR]) gave unsatisfactory control of potato late blight. Under conditions moderately conducive for late blight development, effective control was achieved with 33 to 66% MRAR with either fungicide. The Michigan State University advanced selection, MSG274-3, was the least susceptible ABL tested and, during 1998 to 2000, late blight was effectively managed using reduced rates of fungicides. Application rates of chlorothalonil (33 to 100% MRAR) significantly reduced late blight in the cultivar Snowden (5-day application interval) compared with the nontreated control; whereas, late blight was not effectively controlled in Snowden even at 100% MRAR of chlorothalonil at either 10- or 15-day application intervals in 1999 or 2000. The ABL MSG274-3 was the least susceptible of all cultivars and ABL used in this study, and required minimal chemical protection against late blight. The study demonstrates that ABL with reduced susceptibility to late blight can be managed with reduced fungicide rates and longer application intervals, thus offering more economical control of this disease.
Fusarium root rot is a major limiting factor in snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) production. The level of genetic resistance in commercial bean cultivars is minimal and disease is frequently exacerbated by environmental factors. We investigated the contribution of vigorous, adventitious roots to enhancing root rot tolerance in snap bean. Seedling root system architecture was evaluated in 17 recombinant inbred lines (RILs) from a cross of a resistant snap bean line (FR266) and a susceptible dry bean cultivar (Montcalm). The RILs varied in tolerance to Fusarium root rot. Although overall length and branching density (as measured by fractal dimension and meristem numbers) of root systems were not related to root rot resistance, the lateral root number at the root: shoot interface was positively correlated with genotype tolerance (R2 = 0.6*). Root diameter was also positively correlated with tolerance; this is consistent with the hypothesis that larger adventitious and basal roots are beneficial under disease stress. A field-based study of commercial snap bean cultivars compared raised and flat-bed systems of production, in a soil inoculated with Fusarium solani f. sp. phaseoli. Substantially greater yields (40% to 90%) were observed in raised beds. Root vigor was relatively high (root length density >0.2 cm·cm−3) and root rot scores were lower with raised than with flat-beds, in 2001, but not in 2000. Overall, this is suggestive that integrated crop management practices can improve lateral root vigor and reduce root rot severity.
This chapter presents the disease cycles for various common and economically significant pathogens of the potato crop and emphasizes where in the cycle interventions are thought to be most effective. Tabulated data are provided on the important bacterial, oomycete, and fungal diseases of potato. The survival, spread and epidemiology of these diseases are described, as well as the role of the tuber in the disease cycle. Some measures to control these diseases (including foliar, seed- and soilborne fungal diseases) are provided. Future prospects, considering climate change, fungicide resistance and molecular disease diagnostics, are mentioned.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.