SUMMARY We have tested a wide range of acrylate and methacrylate resin formulations and have concluded that embedding resins can be developed which are usable within a broad range of environmental conditions. To demonstrate this versatility, we have designed two highly‐cross‐linked resins, one polar and the other nonpolar, that are usable to temperatures from 243 to 223 K. Both of these resins formulations, which are now commercially available, show that systematic experiments can be easily done to study the effects of environmental parameters, such as water content, temperature, or resin polarity, on biological material during embedding. Using these resins and aldehyde‐fixed protein crystals, it can be shown that low temperature minimizes the loss of molecular structure to an extent that is not often obtainable with conventional methods of dehydration and embedding. Embedded crystals of aspartate aminotransferase still retained molecular order to 0·6 nm. Embedded crystals of catalase show X‐ray diffraction maxima out to 0·8 nm. When sectioned, catalase revealed stain‐limited electron and optical diffraction patterns to 2·5 nm. Nevertheless, our work clearly demonstrates that low temperature embedding procedures are superior and that versatile, general purpose resins can be designed to take advantage of this fact.

The recently developed low temperature embedding procedure with the resin Lowicryl

No abstract

Freeze-substitution was performed on strains of Escherichia coli, Pasteurella multocida, Campylobacter fetus, Vibrio cholerae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Pseudomonas putida, Aeromonas salmonicida, Proteus mirabilis, Haemophilus pleuropneumoniae, Caulobacter crescentus, and Leptothrix discophora with a substitution medium composed of 2% osmium tetroxide and 2% uranyl acetate in anhydrous acetone. A thick periplasmic gel ranging from 10.6 to 14.3 nm in width was displayed in E. coli K-12, K30, and His 1 (a K-12 derivative containing the K30 capsule genes), P. multocida, C. fetus, P. putida, A. salmonicida, H. pleuropneumoniae, and P. mirabilis. The other bacteria possessed translucent periplasms in which a thinner peptidoglycan layer was seen. Capsular polysaccharide, evident as electron-dense fibers radiating outward perpendicular to the cell surface, was observed on E. coli K30 and His 1 and P. mirabilis cells. A more random arrangement of fibers forming a netlike structure was apparent surrounding cells of H. pleuropneumoniae. For the first time a capsule, distinct from the sheath, was observed on L. discophora. In all instances, capsular polysaccharide was visualized in the absence of stabilizing agents such as homologous antisera or ruthenium red. Other distinct envelope structures were observed external to the outer membrane including the sheath of L. discophora and the S layers of A. salmonicida A450 and C. crescentus CB15A. We believe that the freeze-substitution technique presents a more accurate image of the structural organization of these cells and that it has revealed complex ultrastructural relationships between cell envelope constituents previously difficult to visualize by more conventional means of preparation.

The surface of thin sections of aldehyde-fixed biological material shows a specimen-related relief of 2-6 nm with Lowicryl. Epon sections are about three times smoother. The relief is the consequence of thin-sectioning being in reality a cleavage. Epitopes are supposed to be laid open (or set free) because cleavage follows the interfaces between protein and Lowicryl. We have developed a simple theory on this basis and have theoretically estimated the efficiency of on-section labeling and compared it with experimental data. For randomly dispersed proteins in cytoplasm, Lowicryl sections will yield significant label only when the concentration of the antigen is about 10 microM or more. The complex situation of more compact proteins, as represented by fibers, sheets, and biological membranes is discussed and the difficulty of significant calculations is explained. Pre-embedding labeling and melted cryosections should give 10-30 times more label. The possible reasons for the observed much smaller gain of not more than two to three times are discussed.