Eight isofemale lines of Drosophila melanogaster were raised at four temperatures and at four yeast concentrations in their food. Temperature and food show a significant interaction in determining wing length and thorax length, affecting mean size per line and genetic variation between lines. The combination of low temperature and poor food conditions leads to a sharp increase in the genetic variation over lines of both body size characters. The increase in genetic variation in wing length under less favourable conditions is due to an increase in genetic variation of both cell size and cell number. Changes in wing area in response to both temperature and food level follow a common cell size/cell number trajectory. Changes in wing size are obtained by line-specific changes in the cellular composition of the wing, rather than by changes specific for the environmental factor.

No abstract

Timing of puparium formation in Drosophila melanogaster is set by reaching a critical stage at which larvae attain the ability to pupariate. This critical stage is reached at a relatively constant size characterized by the mean critical weight, i.e. the weight at which 50% of surviving larvae pupate without further feeding. The mean critical weight might be affected by larval growth conditions. This hypothesis was tested by determining the mean critical weight in larvae raised at three temperatures and two food levels, for two isofemale lines from two populations. Pupariation probability is a function of larval weight. The two environmental variables affect pupariation probability and mean critical weight differently. Food level does not affect critical weight but affects weight‐independent mortality; higher temperatures lead to a reduction of mean critical weight. Mean critical weight shows substantial differences between lines; the differences are maintained over temperatures. Genetic variation in mean critical weights has ecological and evolutionary implications.

About 40% of the population variation in the initiation dates of first clutches within years is genetically determined. The onset of laying, which is determined by the female, is not detectably influenced by spatial heterogeneity of the study area.There is a variable selection favoring early, middle, or late laying in some years. Over the study period as a whole there is a slight net selection for laying relatively late.The implications for a potential rapid evolutionary change are discussed. The conclusion is reached that the population mean might change with rates of up to one week per five generations, which is approximately a decade.

SummaryWe have analysed data on weight and tarsus length collected during a long-term study of natural populations of Great Tits to evaluate the relative importance of genetic variation in body size. Some of our data were collected over a 25-year period, and therefore include a relatively large sample of naturally occurring environmental conditions. An overall heritability estimate calculated from the uncorrected mean weights of breeding birds amounts to 0·5. This estimate is unlikely to be influenced by resemblance in environmental conditions between relatives. Heritability estimates based on the size of fledglings vary between zero and the value for adults, depending on the environmental conditions during growth. If the feeding conditions for the nestlings are poor, no resemblance between parents and offspring is observed. Selection against small nestlings acts strongly on the environmental variance. This is concluded from the higher heritability estimates in the same cohorts after survival for at least three months after fledging, compared to measurements on nestlings. Such selection acting differentially on the genetic and environmental components of the phenotypic variance has important consequences for our ability to make predictions of phenotypic change from measured natural selection. Nevertheless, the amount of genetic variation would allow rapid response should selection on adult size occur.