Genetic relationships among leg and performance traits were estimated for 23 975 Large White and Landrace boars fed twice daily to appetite from 27 to 91 kg live weight at Meat and Livestock Commission testing stations between 1966 and 1972. For each boar, an overall leg score was derived as the sum of scores for 19 individual leg traits categorized as ‘absent’ (0), ‘slight’ (1) or ‘severe’ (2) at 91 kg. Heritabilities of leg score were 017 ± 0·03 in Large White and 0·19 ± 0·04 in Landrace. Genetic correlations with a visual ‘leg action’ score on a scale from 1 to 5 averaged 0·93 ± 0·02 over breeds. Genetic and phenotypic correlations between leg scores on the same boars at 27 and 91 kg averaged 0·50 ± 0·17 and 0·15 ± 0·01 respectively.Both breeds showed significant adverse genetic correlations ranging from 0·20 ± 0·10 to 0·40 ± 0·08 between leg score and boar ultrasonic backfat. From slaughtered littermates, leg scores showed favourable genetic correlations with eye-muscle area (0·30 ± 0·10) and killing-out proportion (0·35 ± 011) in Large White and unfavourable correlations with carcass length (0·31 ± 0·10), lean content (0·30 ± 0·14) and backfat (0·33 ± 0·11) in Landrace. There were no associations with growth rate, feed efficiency or the performance index on which boars are selected. The study indicates that leg condition and fatness are adversely genetically related, but that selection on the present national performance index would not be expected to cause a rapid decline in leg condition. Culling on leg score would be expected to reduce the frequency of leg weakness.
SUMMARYRegression of litter weight of newborn lambs on the live weight of ewes at mating has been estimated from data on 15 breeds after conversion of group means of ewes and lambs to natural logarithms. Regression coefficients were estimated to be 0·721 for single lambs, 0·741 for twins and 0·773 for triplets. These values are not signi-ficantly different from each other. Data from ewes with single lambs and from ewes with twins are consistent with the hypothesis that litter weight at birth as a proportion of ewe weight at mating tends to dechne as ewe weight rises from small to large breeds. In a breed with ewes averaging 25 kg the expected birth weight of singles is 9·6% and of twins 15·2%, of ewe weight. For a breed with ewes of 100 kg the corresponding weights would be 6·5% and 10·6% of ewe weight. Since the estimated regression coefficient and the coefficient in the expression for metabolic weight (0·730) are alike, the regression equations can be interpreted as showing that single lambs were 22·6% and twin pairs 36·1% of ewes' metabolic weight.
SUMMARYLitter size (number of lambs born per female lambing) of adult female Finnish Landrace and Tasmanian Merino sheep mated to males of either breed was 2·9 and 1·0 respectively. Breed of ram had a direct effect on the conception rate of the ewes to which they were mated—22% of ewes mated to Merino rams returned to oestrus but only 10% of those mated to Finn rams—but not on their litter size.A comparison of the reproductive performance of crossbred females with that of purebred contemporaries indicated that there was very little or no heterosis for litter size, the crossbreds being almost exactly intermediate between the parents. The proportion of females showing oestrus during the mating period, however, was lower in the Merinos than in the Finns and crossbreds. This was particularly noticeable in females put to the ram at around 6 months of age. Whereas 35 of 36 Finnish Landrace females and 46 of 49 crossbreds showed oestrus, only one of the 20 Merinos did so. At about 6 months of age therefore the crossbred females showed heterosis in the incidence of oestrus.
SUMMARYIn a long-term experiment, the performance of British Friesian, Ayrshire and Jersey cattle and their first and second crosses was evaluated over 526 first and 477 second lactations. Live weight at 18 mo of age and the ratios of lactation yield to live weight were examined as well as milk yield and composition of milk.Percentage heterosis in each combination of two pure breeds was estimated. For the three first crosses combined, heterosis for 305-day milk yield averaged 6·4% in first and 3·7% in second lactations. Heterosis in live weight at 18 mo averaged 2·9%; none was found in the Ayrshire × British Friesian crosses, but the others averaged 4·7%. Second crosses overall had an average live weight near to that of first crosses, but their milk yields were lower and, in the combined lactations, approximately equalled the purebreds' total.Components of variance due to breed and environmental factors were calculated. Breed accounted for 50% of variance in live weight at 18 mo but less than 10% of variance in milk yield.The influence of fertility on heterosis is discussed with reference to earlier findings, and economic implications are considered.
The growth of 12 linear body measurements in Ayrshire cattle was analysed by least-squares methods. Measurements were taken at 3-monthly intervals up to 48 mo of age. Adjustments were made for month and year of birth and for type of birth (twin-born animals comprised 40% of the data). The state of pregnancy or lactation in heifers was also taken in account. Growth curves were fitted to the mean values at the 16 ages and were found to give a close fit. Residual deviations, though small, did show a systematic pattern. The estimated degree of maturity at birth ranged from about 25 % for measures of width to 50 % for measures of height, body length being intermediate at 40 %. To a large extent the different body measurements maintained a uniform pattern of maturing and their ranking for earliness of maturity tended to remain constant throughout the growth period. The application of allometry to the measurements is examined and the error introduced by extrapolating an allometric relationship between characters of different maturing rates is illustrated.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.