The study involved three experiments. The first. a parametric investigation of nictitating membrane conditioning with eight constant intertrial intervals (lTls) between 5 and 120 sec, orthogonal to interstimulus intervals (ISis) of 250 and 750 msec plus three temporal conditioning control groups, revealed that performance improved rapidly with increasing ITI but stabilized at relatively low ITI values. At 75Q-msec lSI, a decrement in performance was found at 60•sec IT!. Experiment II, using constant ITIs of 45-75 sec in 5-sec steps, at 75Q-mseclSI confirmed the trend toward a performance decrement around 60 sec, although the trend was weak and highly variable. Experiment III evaluated the differences in performance between constant and variable ITI, using three ITI values and three conditions of variation at each value. Findings were discussed in terms of differences in conditioning resulting from both length and degree of variation of ITI and some subtle effects which may emerge only when constant ITIs are used.
In three experiments, the nictitating membrane response of rabbits was conditioned for 10 daily sessions at interstimulus intervals (ISIs) ranging from 48 to 125 msec, followed by a shift to 250 msec for 5 days. At tested ISIs shorter than 67 msec, there was no evidence of conditioning, and postshift performance revealed neither facilitation nor interference as a result of the first 10 conditioning sessions. Postshift performance of groups conditioned at preshift ISIs of 67 msec or longer revealed a gradient of increasing savings with increasing lSI. One of the groups in Experiment 1, initially conditioned at 250 msec lSI and then shifted to 48 msec, exhibited extinction of the previously well-conditioned response. Analysis of CR-onset latencies substantiated the absence of associative effects at very short ISIs. It was concluded that there is a temporal limit below which classical conditioning of the nictitating membrane response of rabbits employing forward CS-US pairing does not occur.The detailed interstimulus interval (lSI) function for the rabbit nictitating response (NMR), established by Smith, Coleman and Gormezano (1969), indicates that the minimum lSI required for conditioning is between 50 and 100 msec. Smith et al. found no evidence of conditioning at ISIs of -50, 0 or 50 msec, but increasingly rapid acquisition at ISIs of 100 msec and higher. Recent studies, however, have seemed to show substantial conditioning at 50-msec lSI (Patterson, 1970) as well as simultaneous and backward conditioning in rats and rabbits (e.g
A parametric investigation of nictitating membrane conditioning with interstimulus intervals (ISIs) of 250 or 1.000 msec. constant intertrial intervals (1TIs) of 30 or 90 sec. and 5. 15. 30. 60. or 120 trials per daily session revealed that acquisition rate decreased as a fUr;lction of both larger number of trials per session (NTS) and longer lSI. but with larger overall effects of NTS occurring at the longer lSI. The effects of lengthening the ITI were also greater at the higher NTS and varied as a function of lSI. Results were discussed in terms of several constructs used to explain time-related conditioning effects. namely reactive inhibition. stimulus fluctuation. consolidation. and rehearsal.The number of trials per session (NTS) has received considerable attention in the recent conditioning literature. In a study involving nictitating membrane response (NMR) conditioning. Hupka. varied interstimulus interval (lSI) and NTS and found that acquisition was directly related to NTS. with faster acquisition at smaller NTS. Moreover. there were only slight differences in acquisition rate as a function of lSI with larger NTS. a tinding which seems to be at variance with much of the conditioning literature. Levinthal and Papsdorf (1970). using only one trial per daily session. found a reversal of the usual lSI function. That is. at 1 TS. their 1.2SO-msec lSI group conditioned significantly more rapidly than their 2SO-msec group. In a later paper. Levinthal (1973) replicated the earlier finding. and in addition. using 1. 5. or 20 TS. found that the lSI reversal took place between 1 and 5 TS. In a more recent study. Kehoe and Gormezano (1974) employed 1. 5. 10. or SO TS, and confirmed the previous findings that acquisition rate varied systematically as a function of NTS.In addition to these studies. there is increasing evidence in the rabbit conditioning literature that conditioned responses (CRs) often emerge in the early trials-frequently the first trial--of a session and continue at a rate of nearly 100% even though no CRs had occurred in previous sessions. This phenomenon has been obse~ved frequently in our laboratory and has been noted in several recent studies (e.g., who referred to it as an "overnight gains effect" (1966, p, 211), offered no explanation. Hupka et at. suggested that the effect might result from over night consolidation of training, Regardless of the explanation. however, it seems likely that the effect would be related to such variables as NTS,The purpose of the present study was to investigate the relationship between NTS, lSI. and ITI over an extensive range of NTS values. METHOD SubjectsThe subjects were 145 naive male and female New Zealand rabbits, 70 to 100 days old at the start of the experiment. They were maintained on ad-lib food and water and housed in Iight-and climate-controlled quarters. ApparatusFour rabbits were run concurrently in a sound-attenuated room containing four separate cubicles. serviced independently by control and recording equipment located in an adjoining room....
The effects of low-level hippocampal stimulation on the development of latent inhibition were investigated employing classical conditioning of the nictitating membrane response of rabbits. Four groups were given either (a) no preexposure of the to-be-CS, (b) preexposure, (c) preexposure overlapped by hippocampal stimulation or (d) preexposure overlapped by cortical stimulation, followed by 300 conditioning trials for each group. After conditioning, the hippocampal group was divided into two groups designated HS-1 and HS-2 by means of a post-hoc test for stimulation effects. Conditioning was found to be retarded in all three preexposed groups, with significantly greater retardation (augmentation of latent inhibition) in Group HS-2. The results support a general conception that the hippocampal stimulation produced its effects through the modulation of sensory input.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.