A total of 394 patients with advanced, measurable squamous carcinoma of the uterine cervix and no prior chemotherapy were randomized to therapy with either carboplatin or iproplatin. There were 23 patients ineligible for the study and 10 patients who were not evaluable; the remaining 361 patients were evaluable for response and adverse effects. Randomization was well balanced for age, performance status, and prior therapy. Both platinum analogs were given every 28 days with starting doses of 400 mg/m2 for carboplatin (340 mg/m2 if the patient underwent prior radiation) and 270 mg/m2 for iproplatin (230 mg/m2 if the patient underwent prior radiation). These doses are equivalent to cisplatin doses of 75 to 100 mg/m2. Hematologic toxicity was dose-limiting, among which thrombocytopenia was slightly more common than leukopenia. Gastrointestinal toxicity was also prominent with both agents; however, iproplatin was significantly more toxic than carboplatin (P less than .001). Renal, otic, and peripheral nervous system toxicities were absent or infrequent with both analogs. No electrolyte abnormalities were observed. The percentage of planned dosages that were actually administered was 100% of carboplatin doses and 85% of iproplatin doses (P less than .0001). The reduction in iproplatin dose was apparently due to gastrointestinal toxicity. Response rates were similar for both agents (15% for carboplatin, 11% for iproplatin) and appear to be inferior to those noted with the parent compound, cisplatin.

Background: During an international workshop held in September 1998, a group of specialists in the field of ovarian cancer reached consensus on a number of issues with implications for standard practice and for research of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.Methods: Five groups of experts considered several issues which incl uded: biologic factors, prognostic factors, surgery, init ial chemotherapy, second-line treatment, the use of CA 125, investigational drugs, intra-peritoneal treatment and high-dose chemotherapy. The group attempted to arrive at answers to questions such as: Are there prognostic factors, which help to identify patients who will not do well with CUITent therapy? What is the current best therapy for advanced ovarian carcinoma? What directions sho uld research take in advanced ovarian cancer? T hese issues were discussed in a plenary meeting.

No abstract

5006 Background: Bevacizumab (BV), a recombinant, humanized monoclonal antibody directed against vascular endothelial growth factor, has demonstrated clinical benefit in multiple tumor types. Activity in ovarian cancer (OC) has been reported in phase II studies in patients (pts) with recurrent disease. We now describe the activity/safety of BV in pts with platinum-resistant OC (PROC) that progressed after topotecan or liposomal doxorubicin (LD). Methods: Eligibility criteria for this multicenter, Phase II study included primary or secondary PROC that progressed within 3 months of topotecan or LD, 3 or fewer prior chemotherapy regimens, and a performance status (PS) 0 or 1. BV was dosed at 15 mg/kg q 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) as defined by RECIST. A two-stage design was utilized with H1 set at 15%. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response, overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: The study enrolled 44 of the intended 53 pts, closing early due to a higher than expected rate of gastrointestinal perforations (GIP). Baseline characteristics included median age 60 yrs (range 31–87); PS 0 in 26 pts, 1 in 18 pts; 2 prior chemotherapy regimens in 20 pts, 3 in 24 pts. Preliminary efficacy: ORR (CR+PR), 7/44 (16%). Median duration of response was 12 weeks, with 2 pts continuing on study >5 months. Serious adverse events (SAEs) were reported in 18/44 pts (41%). Selected SAEs included GIP 5 (11%; one occurred more than 30 days after coming off study while on paclitaxel and commercial Avastin®), bowel obstruction 5 (11%), arterial thromboembolic events 4 (9%), delayed wound healing 2 (5%), and one case each of pulmonary hypertension, hypertensive encephalopathy, and hypoxia. Conclusions: BV has single agent activity in women with PROC, but is associated with substantial toxicity in this population. Trials are ongoing in less heavily treated, newly diagnosed pts with OC to evaluate the efficacy and safety of BV in these disease settings. Identification of risk factors for BV-associated adverse events requires further study. [Table: see text]