The MS registry provides valuable data on patterns of care for MS patients in Germany, and may help to improve service provision and overall quality of life for these patients.
Since 2002, an MS Registry has been implemented by the German MS Society in more than 100 German MS centres. The objective is to provide information about disease characteristics, and to monitor the health care situation in a large population of patients. The aim of this report is to give detailed results on MS symptoms. By October 2008, data sets from 16,554 patients were recorded by 86 centres. A strikingly high number of persons suffered from fatigue and other "invisible" symptoms during early and late stages of the disease, underscoring the negative impact of these symptoms on quality of life in MS patients.
In the summer of 2001, a nationwide epidemiological multiple sclerosis (MS) register was initiated under the auspices of the German MS Society (DMSG). This project aimed at collecting epidemiological data on the number of patients with MS, course of the disease, and their social situation in Germany. During the 2-year pilot phase, five MS centers with various regional differences and treatment methods participated, leading to a representative selection of patients. In December 2003, standardised data sets of 3,458 MS patients were available for evaluation. After examining the quality of the data, 3,223 sets remained for further analysis. The demographics were similar to those obtained from other epidemiological studies: 72% of the patients were female, mean age was 42.9+/-11.2 years, mean disease duration 12.6+/-8.7 years, and 64% suffered from the relapsing-remitting form of the disease. The median EDSS was 3.0, and 69% of patients had an EDSS =4.0. The great effect of this disorder was underscored by the fact that one third of the patients had prematurely retired due to MS. After successful completion of the pilot phase, the MS register will provide reliable data and thus serve as an important tool to improve the overall situation of MS patients in Germany.
Interferon beta (IFN beta) preparations are the most frequently prescribed therapies for patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS). Several open-label observational studies report similar efficacy among IFN beta preparations. The Quality Assessment in Multiple Sclerosis Therapy (QUASIMS) study is a large, open-label observational study designed to compare the effectiveness and tolerability of available IFN beta preparations as disease-modifying therapies for relapsing MS across a wide range of clinical practice settings. This retrospective, controlled cohort study was conducted by chart review at 510 sites in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. Enrolled patients had received one of the four available IFN beta preparations/dosing regimens (intramuscular IFN beta-1a 30 microg 1x/week [Avonex], subcutaneous (SC) IFN beta-1a 22 or 44 microg 3 x/week [Rebif], or SC IFN beta-1b 250 microg 3.5x/week [Betaferon/Betaseron]) for >or= 2 years. Pre-planned outcomes at 1 and 2 years included change from baseline Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score, percentage of progression-free patients (< 1.0 EDSS point), annualised relapse rate (RR), percentage of relapse-free patients, and reasons for therapy change. Of 4754 evaluable patients, 3991 (84%) received IFN beta as initial therapy. There were no significant differences among IFN betas when used as initial or follow-up therapy on almost all outcome variables. Relapse rate was consistently higher and percentage of relapse-free patients consistently lower for all products used as follow-up versus initial therapy. Results of QUASIMS showed similar effectiveness among IFN beta products. Benefits were consistently superior when IFN beta was used as initial rather than follow-up therapy. Our results suggest that patients do not benefit in terms of disease outcome from switching between IFN beta preparations/dosing regimens.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.