Scientists produce vast amounts of data that often are not preserved properly or do not have inventories, placing them at risk. As part of an effort to more fully understand the data-at-risk predicament, researchers who were engaged in the DARI project at UNC's Metadata Research Center surveyed information custodians working in a range of settings. The survey collected information on the data characteristics and preservation plans. Forty-three information custodians completed the survey. The results indicate that atrisk data include a variety of formats, subject areas, and ownership status, as well as compliance with a variety of standards. Although a majority of respondents agree that data preservation is important, they caution that time is the greatest barrier to sharing these data. The study has implications for data rescue and for training information custodians.xperimental and observational data are central to scientific research. With a growing pool of scientific data, researchers have the potential to investigate new questions and use new analytical techniques. To enable this data revolution, the National Science Foundation has funded initiatives to develop cyberinfrastructure for managing, preserving, and sharing scientific data.1 In addition to infrastructure development, there are increasing expectations of open access and new mandates for scientific data management and sharing. For instance, on February 22, 2013, the U.S. Office of Science and Technology Policy released a memo directing federal agencies to increase public access to federal research publications and digital data.2 The memo called for federal agencies with over $100 million in research and development expenditures to develop policies and a plan for access and long-term preservation of government-sponsored research products. Open access presents many challenges for scientists. Scientists are so concerned about data sharing and preservation that the editors of Science recently devoted a special issue to the topic.
Examining fragile scientific data is crucial to ensuring that these data are not lost and can continue to be part of the scientific process. In order to investigate various aspects of endangered scientific data the Data‐At‐Risk Initiative (DARI) project has conducted three studies that provide insight into the current state of scientific data‐at‐risk. The three projects include (1) a metadata/system review of the of the to the Data‐At‐Risk Inventory, (2) focus groups with fourteen scientific scholars, and (3) surveys completed by 43 information custodians. This poster reports results from these studies, specifically how scientific scholars and information custodians view endangered data. The DARI project aims to understand the current state of endangered scientific data and to assist in the reduction of loss of valuable scientific data.
UP till recent times our methods of controlling the spread of diphtheria were guided by the principle of locking the stable door after the horse had been stolen. Notification of the disease, removal to hospital, with subsequent disinfection of the house, clothing and bedding was the routine. When throat swabbing became more general, we felt that we had made a further advance in eliminating possible spreaders of the disease. Still further progress was expected by the administration of preventive doses of antitoxin among immediate contacts, though the practice never became very general in this country. Actual experience has always proved the elusiveness of the " carrier " in diphtheria. In fact it may be said, at the outset of this contribution,
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.