The transcription factors Batf3 and IRF8 are required for development of CD8α+ conventional dendritic cells (cDCs), but the basis for their actions was unclear. Here, we identify two novel Zbtb46+ progenitors that separately generate CD8α+ and CD4+ cDCs and arise directly from the common DC progenitor (CDP). Irf8 expression in the CDP depends on prior PU.1-dependent autoactivation, and specification of pre-CD8 DC progenitors requires IRF8 but not Batf3. However, upon pre-CD8 DC specification, Irf8 autoactivation becomes Batf3-dependent at a CD8α+ cDC-specific enhancer containing multiple AP1-IRF composite elements (AICEs) within the Irf8 superenhancer. CDPs from Batf3−/− mice that specify toward pre-CD8 DCs fail to complete CD8α+ cDC development due to decay of Irf8 autoactivation, and divert to the CD4+ cDC lineage.

The dendritic cells (DCs) of the immune system function in innate and adaptive responses by directing activity of various effector cells rather than serving as effectors themselves. DCs and closely related myeloid lineages share expression of many surface receptors, presenting a challenge in distinguishing their unique in vivo functions. Recent work has taken advantage of unique transcriptional programs to identify and manipulate murine DCs in vivo. This work has assigned several nonredundant in vivo functions to distinct DC lineages, consisting of plasmacytoid DCs and several subsets of classical DCs that promote different immune effector modules in response to pathogens. In parallel, a correspondence between human and murine DC subsets has emerged, underlying structural similarities for the DC lineages between these species. Recent work has begun to unravel the transcriptional circuitry that controls the development and diversification of DCs from common progenitors in the bone marrow.

Dendritic cells (DCs) play critical roles in activating innate immune cells and initiating adaptive immune responses. The functions of DCs were originally obscured by their overlap with other mononuclear phagocytes, but new mouse models have allowed for the selective ablation of subsets of DCs and have helped to identify their non-redundant roles in the immune system. These tools have elucidated the functions of DCs in host defense against pathogens, autoimmunity, and cancer. This review will describe the mouse models generated to interrogate the role of DCs, and will discuss how their use has progressively clarified our understanding of the unique functions of DC subsets.

Conventional type 1 dendritic cells (cDC1s 1 ) are thought to perform antigen cross-presentation required to prime CD8 T cells 2 , 3 , while cDC2 are considered specialized for priming CD4 T cells 4 , 5 . CD4 T cells are also thought to help CD8 T cell responses through a variety of mechanisms 6 – 11 , including a model in which CD4 T cells ‘license’ cDC1 for CD8 T cell priming 12 . However, this model has not been directly tested in vivo or in the setting of a help-dependent tumour rejection. Here, we generated an Xcr1 -Cre mouse strain to evaluate the cellular interactions that mediate tumour rejection in a model requiring CD4 and CD8 T cells. As expected, tumour rejection required cDC1, and expression of MHC-I by cDC1. Unexpectedly, early priming of CD4 T cell against tumour-derived antigens also required cDC1, which was not simply due to a role in antigen transport to lymph nodes for processing by cDC2, since selective deletion of MHC-II in cDC1 also prevented early CD4 T cell priming. Further, deletion of either MHC-II or CD40 in cDC1 impaired tumour rejection, consistent with a role for cognate CD4 T cell interactions and CD40 signaling in cDC1 licensing. Finally, CD40 signaling in cDC1 was critical not only for CD8 T cell priming, but also for initial CD4 T cell activation. Thus, in the setting of tumour-derived antigens, cDC1 function as an autonomous platform capable of antigen processing and priming for both CD4 and CD8 T cells and directly orchestrating their cross-talk required for optimal anti-tumour immunity.