Background Teaching based on virtual reality simulators in medicine has expanded in recent years due to the limitations of more traditional methods, especially for surgical procedures such as laparoscopy. Purpose of review To analyze the effects of using virtual reality simulations on the development of laparoscopic skills in medical students and physicians. Data sources The literature screening was done in April 2020 through Medline (PubMed), EMBASE and Database of the National Institute of Health. Eligibility criteria Randomized clinical trials that subjected medical students and physicians to training in laparoscopic skills in virtual reality simulators. Study appraisal Paired reviewers independently identified 1529 articles and included 7 trials that met the eligibility criteria. Findings In all studies, participants that trained in virtual simulators showed improvements in laparoscopic skills, although the articles that also had a physical model training group did not show better performance of one model compared to the other. Limitations No article beyond 2015 met the eligibility criteria, and the analyzed simulators have different versions and models, which might impact the results. Conclusion Virtual reality simulators are useful educational tools, but do not show proven significant advantages over traditional models. The lack of standardization and a scarcity of articles makes comparative analysis between simulators difficult, requiring more research in the area, according to the model suggested in this review. Systematic review registration number Registered by the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO), identification code CRD42020176479.

No abstract

No abstract

The prevalence of hernias in patient with cirrhosis can reach up to 40%. The pathophysiology of cirrhosis is closely linked to that of the umbilical hernia, but other types are also common in this population. The aim of this study is to evaluate factors that influence in the prognosis after hernia repair in patients with cirrhosis. A historical cohort of 6419 patients submitted to hernia repair was gathered. Clinical, epidemiological data and hernia characteristics were obtained. For patient with cirrhosis, data from exams, surgery and follow-up outcomes were also analyzed. Survival curves were constructed to assess the impact of clinical and surgical variables on survival. 342 of the 6352 herniated patients were cirrhotic. Patient with cirrhosis had a higher prevalence of umbilical hernia (67.5% × 24.2%, P < .001) and a lower prevalence of epigastric (1.8% × 9.0%, P < .001) and lumbar (0% × 0.18%, P = .022). There were no significant differences in relation to inguinal hernia (P = .609). Ascites was present in 70.1% of patient with cirrhosis and its prevalence was different in relation to the type of hernia (P < .001). The survival curve showed higher mortality for emergency surgery, MELD > 14 and ascites (HR 12.6 [3.79–41.65], 4.5 [2.00–10.34], and 6.1 [1.15–20.70], respectively, P < .05). Hernia correction surgery in patient with cirrhosis has a high mortality, especially when performed under urgent conditions associated with more severe clinical conditions of patients, such as the presence of ascites and elevated MELD.