In-hospital morbidity was 19.38% (19 patients) for the entire study group. Bypass group had a lower morbidity rate as compared to the resection group (p=0.029). Inhospital mortality rate was 6.12% (6 patients) for the entire study group. Mortality rates did not differ between the groups. Patient satisfaction with palliation of symptoms was similar between gastric bypass and resection. Gastric resection group had significantly better survival (p=0.002) compared to the non resective procedures. However, gastric bypass did not confer any survival benefit over exploratory laparotomy. (p=0.501)kw]Conclusions Gastric bypass can be done when resection is not possible as it palliates symptoms on par with resection and is associated with low operative morbidity though it does not improve the survival outlook of patients.
Context Role of bypass as a palliative surgery for advanced gastric cancer remains controversial.Aims To determine the role of bypass in advanced gastric cancer in comparision to resection as gold standard.Design Hospital-based retrospective outcome as study.Methods Patients were divided into three groups: group I (gastric resection), group II (bypass) and group III (exploratory laparotomy alone). The three groups were analysed for palliation of symptoms, operative morbidity and mortality and survival.Statistical analysis used Chi-square, Fischer, One-way Anova, Unpaired-t, Kaplan-Meier analysis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.