ObjectiveTo analyze the requesting patterns for a range of laboratory tests ordered in 2009 from eight laboratories providing services to eight health areas, using appropriate indicators.DesignIndicators measured every test request per 1,000 inhabitants, and indicators that measured the number of tests per related test requested by general practitioners were calculated. The savings generated, if each Health Care Department achieved the appropriate indicator standard, were also calculated. Laboratory Information System registers were collected, and indicators were calculated automatically in each laboratory using a data warehouse application.ResultsThere was a large difference in demand for tests by health areas. The ratio of related tests also showed a great variability. The savings generated if each Health Care Department had achieved the appropriate indicator standard were €172,116 for free thyroxine, €18,289 for aspartate aminotransferase, and €62,678 for urea.ConclusionsConsiderable variability exists in general practitioners' demand for laboratory tests.
Background: A new electrochemiluminescent immunoassay (ECLIA) has been developed for the determination of cytokeratin 19 (CYFRA 21-1) in the Elecsys 2010 immunoassay system. Urinary CYFRA 21-1 might have a role in the diagnosis of bladder cancer.
Methods: We performed an analytical evaluation of the CYFRA 21-1 ECLIA for serum and urine samples. The clinical value of urinary CYFRA 21-1 for the detection of bladder cancer was evaluated through its measurement in 226 urine samples from symptomatic and asymptomatic controls.
Results: At concentrations of 2–30 μg/L, within-assay imprecision (CV) was below 2.1% for sera and 3.3% for urines, with interassay CVs below 3.3% for sera and 4.9% for urines. The day-to-day CV was <20% at concentrations >0.2 μg/L (functional sensitivity). Measurement of diluted samples showed that the assay estimated CYFRA 21-1 between 98% and 103% for sera and 98% and 105% for urines. Recovery of added CYFRA 21-1 was 99–105% for sera and 96–115% for urines. We separately compared serum and urine CYFRA 21-1 ECLIA results with those obtained with an IRMA (CIS bio international). Regression analysis for sera was: CYFRA 21-1 (ECLIA) = 0.520 + 1.018 CYFRA 21-1 (IRMA); [95% confidence interval (CI) (y-intercept), −0.260 to 1.309]; 95% CI (slope), 0.978–1.060; n = 100; Sy|x = 3.242; r2 = 0.987. For urine samples it was: CYFRA 21-1 (ECLIA) = 0.716 + 0.966 CYFRA 21-1 (IRMA); 95% CI (y-intercept), 0.009–1.422; 95% CI (slope), 0.956–0.976; n = 100; Sy|x = 4.136; r2 = 0.986. In urine samples voided by patients with and without bladder cancer, the best ROC analysis discrimination provided 81.0% (95% CI, 72.7–87.7%) sensitivity and 97.2% (95% CI, 90.2–99.6%) specificity at a threshold value of 5.7 μg/L.
Conclusions: Our initial evaluation showed reliable analytical performance for urinary CYFRA 21-1, which might assist urologists in the detection of bladder cancer as a noninvasive adjunct to cystoscopy.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.