This paper presents a model of competition between an incumbent firm and an Other Licensed Operator (OLO) in the broadband market, where the incumbent has an investment option to build a Next Generation network (NGN) and it can do so by making an investment sharing agreement with the OLO, or alone. Two different kinds of investment sharing contractual forms are analysed, a basic investment sharing, where no side-payment is given for the use of the NGN between co-investors, and joint-venture, where a side-payment is set by the co-investing firms. Results show that investment sharing can potentially be beneficial in terms of competition and investments, but the number of firms involved matters and so does the choice of the NGN access price, for insiders and outsiders of the agreement. Even when the presence of firms outside of the agreement force insiders to compete more fiercely, there might be a concern with the potential exclusion of the outsiders from the NGN.

The Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies (RSCAS), created in 1992 and directed by Stefano Bartolini since September 2006, aims to develop inter-disciplinary and comparative research and to promote work on the major issues facing the process of integration and European society.The Centre is home to a large post-doctoral programme and hosts major research programmes and projects, and a range of working groups and ad hoc initiatives. The research agenda is organised around a set of core themes and is continuously evolving, reflecting the changing agenda of European integration and the expanding membership of the European Union.Details of the research of the Centre can be found on:

Impaired GH-IGF-1 axis may be involved in growth delay of children with infantile AN. A strict collaboration between endocrine pediatricians and child psychiatrists is advisable in the assessment of poor growing children without recognizable organic causes, showing normal/high GH levels and low IGF-1 values.

Purpose To provide a description about a cohort of preschoolers with feeding disorders (FD) recruited from the therapeutic nursery "Cerco Asilo" of a tertiary care University Hospital, and to evaluate the short-term clinical outcome after 6 months of multidisciplinary treatment. Methods The present inception cohort study was based on an observational longitudinal research design comparing families who underwent the multidisciplinary treatment and those who did not. 42 children (47.6% female; 52.4% males-mean age 36.7 months, SD 17.2, range 2.3-65 months) underwent FD assessment according to the DC-0-3R diagnostic criteria (T0). At the end of the assessment, 62% of families with FD children agreed to be included in the family-based treatment. Both treated and untreated children with FD underwent a follow-up clinical evaluation after 6 months (T1) from baseline. Comparison of clinical features at T0 between groups of subjects resolving or not the FD was performed. To evaluate baseline factors associated with FD resolution, principal components analysis (PCA) was used to identify new synthetic variables that were then used in a logistics analysis. Moreover, clinical differences between T1 and T0 were compared with a t test. Results Two third of the cases (66.7%) resolved the FD, while one third (33.3%) did not. Children who had the FD resolved displayed at T0 significant differences in clinical features with respect to those who did not. Specifically, the FD subtype Feeding Disorder of Caregiver-Infant Reciprocity was strongly associated with resolution, while the subtype Infantile Anorexia was not. In addition, the component depicting "Anxious-Depressed", "Mood" and "Isolation" problems was independently associated with a significantly higher probability of resolution, similar to children having FD other than anorexia. Conclusions FD in preschoolers are associated with problems in emotional development and in the relationship with parents. These difficulties tend to accentuate if the disorder persists. The study suggests the need to investigate the maintaining factors of FD in preschool age. Level of evidence Level IV: Evidence obtained from multiple time series with and without the intervention.

No abstract