No abstract

Aims/hypothesis. Juvenile-onset, insulin-dependent diabetes is associated with islet cell antibodies and with specific ªhigh-riskº HLA-DRB1 and HLA-DQB1 genotypes. Patients with Type II (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus can have islet-related antibodies, but the genotypic associations at different ages of onset have not been evaluated. Our aim was to determine (i) the prevalence of DRB1 and DQB1 genotypes in patients at diagnosis of Type II diabetes at different ages from 25 to 65 years compared with the general population, and (ii) whether the presence of islet cell antibodies (ICA) or glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies (GADA) or both by age is associated with different DRB1 and DQB1 genotypes. Methods. The antibodies to islet cells and those to glutamic acid decarboxylase were measured in 1712 white Caucasian diabetic subjects at diagnosis of diabetes and they were genotyped for HLA DRB1*03 and DRB1*04 and the high-risk DRB1*04-DQB1* 0302 haplotype. To assess over-representation of high-risk alleles for Type I (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus, the prevalence of high-risk alleles in diabetic patients was expressed relative to the prevalence of low-risk alleles, non-DR3/non-DR4, that provided a reference denominator in both the diabetic patients and in 200 non-diabetic control subjects. The prevalence of ICA or GADA or both in patients with different HLA genotypes was assessed in those diagnosed in four age groups, 25±34 years, 35±44 years, 45±54 years and 55±65 years. Results. In Type II diabetic patients presenting at ages 25±34, 35±44 and 45±54 years, there was an increased prevalence of DR3/DR4 compared with the general population with approximately 6.5-fold, 2.9-fold, 2.1-fold over-representation, respectively (p < 0.0001, < 0.01, < 0.05) but this was not found in those aged 55±65 years old. In the group aged 25±34 years, 32 % of patients with ICA or GADA or both had DRB1*03/DRB1*04-DQB1*0302 compared with 10 % in those aged 55±65 years and expected 3 % prevalence. Conversely, only 14 % of those aged 25±34 years with antibodies had non-DR3/non-DR4, compared with 35 % in those aged 55±65 years. There was thus pronounced age heterogeneity in DRB1 and DQB1 predisposition to Type II diabetes. The antibodies displaced DRB1 or DQB1 genotypes in the multivariate model for requiring insulin therapy by 6 years of follow-up. Conclusion/hypothesis. The age of presentation of Type I diabetes in adulthood was in part dependent on the DRB1/DQB1 genotype. Islet cell antibodies and glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies were strongly associated with DRB1*03/DRB1*04-DQB1*0302 in early adulthood but showed little relation with specific HLA genotypes after the age of 55 years. [Diabetologia (1999) 42: 608±616]

The ATP-sensitive K-channel plays a central role in insulin release from pancreatic beta cells. This channel consists of two subunits: a sulphonyl-urea receptor, SUR1, and an inwardly rectifying K-channel subunit, Kir6.2. We screened 135 white Caucasian patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) and 90 non-diabetic subjects for mutations in the Kir6.2 gene by single-stranded conformational polymorphism (SSCP) analysis. We identified one silent mutation (A190A) and four missense mutations (E23K, L270V, I337V and S385C) in normal and diabetic individuals. In a single diabetic subject, we identified a two-amino acid insertion (380KP). We also screened 39 Afro-Caribbean diabetic subjects and identified one additional missense (L355P) and one more silent (S363S) mutation. The E23K and I337V variants were completely linked. The common variants (E23K, 1337V and L270V) were found with similar frequency in diabetic and normal subjects. Diabetic subjects with the variants responded normally to sulphonylurea therapy. When mutant Kir6.2 subunits were coexpressed with SUR1 in Xenopus oocytes, there was no difference in the sensitivity of the whole-cell currents to metabolic inhibition or to the sulphonylurea tolbutamide. We therefore conclude that mutations in Kir6.2 are unlikely to be a major cause of NIDDM.

Aims/hypothesis Latent autoimmune diabetes in adults (LADA) is a slowly progressive form of autoimmune diabetes, with autoantibodies to islet proteins developing in older patients who have no immediate requirement for insulin therapy. Markers of its clinical course are uncharacterised. The aim of this study was to determine whether persistence of, or changes in, GAD65 autoantibodies (GADAs) in the LADA patients who participated in the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) were associated with disease progression or insulin requirement. Methods GADA levels and their relative epitope reactivities to N-terminal, middle and C-terminal regions of human GAD65 were determined in 242 UKPDS patients who were GADA-positive at diagnosis; samples taken after 0.5, 3 and 6 years of follow-up were tested using a radiobinding assay. Comparisons were made of GADA status with clinical details and disease progression assessed by the requirement for intensified glucose-lowering therapy. Results GADA levels fluctuated between 0.5 and 6 years but persisted in 225 of 242 patients. No association of GADA levels with disease progression or insulin requirement was observed. Antibody reactivity was directed to Cterminal and middle epitopes of GAD65 in >70% patients, and the N-terminal in <9%. There were no changes in epitope reactivity pattern over the 6 year follow-up period, nor any association between epitope reactivity and insulin requirement.

The etiopathological relationship between latent autoimmune diabetes in adults (LADA) and classical type 1 (insulin dependent) diabetes remains unclear. Variation at the insulin gene variable number of tandem repeats (VNTR) minisatellite influences susceptibility to type 1 diabetes, but studies in LADA have been small and inconsistent. We examined the role of insulin gene variation (using flanking variants as surrogates for VNTR subtypes) in the largest case-control study of LADA to date (400 case and 332 control subjects). Highly significant associations were identified with disease, with dominant protective effects of the T allele at ؊23HphI As with type 1 diabetes, the ؊23HphI variant (a surrogate for the subdivision of VNTR into class I and III alleles) most clearly defined susceptibility in LADA. However, there was no association with age at diagnosis or requirement for insulin therapy 6 years postdiagnosis. This study establishes that variation within the insulin gene region does influence susceptibility to LADA, with the direction and magnitude of effect indistinguishable from that previously reported for type 1 diabetes. In conclusion, differences in VNTR-encoded susceptibility do not explain the differences in clinical presentation that distinguish classical type 1 diabetes and LADA.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract