Pump intake structure design is one area where physical models still remain as the only acceptable method that can provide reliable engineering results. Ensuring the amount of turbulence, entrained air vortices, and swirl are kept within acceptable limits requires site-specific, expensive, and time-consuming physical model studies. This study aims to investigate the viability of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) as an alternative tool for pump intake design thus reducing the need for extensive physical experiments. In this study, a transient multiphase simulation of a 530 mm wide rectangular intake sump housing a 116 m3/h pump is presented. The flow conditions, vortex formation and inlet swirl are compared to an existing 1:10 reduced scaled physical model test. For the baseline test, the predicted surface and submerged vortices agreed well with those observed in the physical model. Both the physical model test and the numerical model showed that the initial geometry of the pump sump is unacceptable as per ANSI/HI 9.8 criteria. Strong type 2 to type 3 submerged vortices were observed at the floor of the pump and behind the pump. Consequently, numerical simulations of proposed sump design modification are further investigated. Two CFD models with different fillet-splitter designs are evaluated and compared based on the vortex formation and swirl. In the study, it was seen that a trident-shaped splitter design was able to prevent flow separation and vortex suppression as compared to a cross-baffle design based on ANSI/HI 9.8. CFD results for the cross-baffle design showed that backwall and floor vortices were still present and additional turbulence was observed due to the cross-flow caused by the geometry. Conversely, CFD results for the trident-shaped fillet-splitter design showed stable flow and minimized the floor and wall vortices previously observed in the first two models.
Like any other turbomachinery, it is essential that the hydraulic behavior and performance of mixed-flow pumps are evaluated way in advance prior to manufacturing. Pump performance relies heavily on the proper design of the intake structure. Intake structures should be accurately designed in order to minimize and avoid unnecessary swirl and vortex formations. Ensuring the optimum performance condition as well as predicting how a particular intake structure affects the efficiency of the pump often requires either physical model studies or theoretical evaluations. Unfortunately, physical models are costly, time-consuming, and site-specific. Conversely, design and performance predictions using a theoretical approach merely gives performance values or parameters, which are usually unable to determine the root cause of poor pump performance. This study evaluates the viability of using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) as an alternative tool for pump designers and engineers in evaluating pump performance. A procedure for conducting CFD simulations to verify pump characteristics such as head, efficiency, and flow as an aid for preliminary pump design is presented. Afterwards, a multiphase simulation using the VOF approach is applied to compare the fluid dynamics between four different pump intake structures. A full-sized CFD model of the pump sump complete with the pump’s active components was used for the intake structure analysis in order to avoid scaling issues encountered during the reduced-scale physical model test. The results provided a clear illustration of the hydraulic phenomena and characteristic curves of the pump. A performance drop in terms of reduction in TDH was predicted across the various intake structure designs. The CFD simulation of intake structure provided a clear insight on the varying degree of swirl, flow circulation, and effect on pump efficiency between all four cases.
Over the years, Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) has been an integral part of most pump design processes. Unfortunately, as calculation schemes and flow investigations become more complicated, the cost of conducting numerical simulations also becomes more expensive in terms of computational time. To remedy this, cutting-edge technology, together with novel calculation techniques, are continuously introduced with the end target of producing more accurate results and faster computing time. In this paper, CFD simulations are run on a numerical model of a double-volute double-suction pump prepared using ANSYS Fluent Mosaic meshing technology. Poly-Hexcore, the first application of Mosaic technology, fills the bulk region with octree hexes, keeps a high-quality layered poly-prism mesh in the boundary layer, and conformally connects these two meshes with general polyhedral elements. This technology promises to provide a lower number of cells along with a significant increase in computing speed. In this paper, steady state results of the model with Mosaic Poly-Hexcore mesh with ~37% fewer cells produced comparable results with a similarly sized model prepared with multi-block structured hexagonal mesh. The predicted pump head, efficiency and shaft power under the design conditions were within 1% for both models, while calculation time was reduced by ~25%. Additional simulations using the Poly-Hexcore mesh showed that the model was able to closely predict the pump’s NPSH3 for 0.8QD, 1.0QD, and 1.2QD compared with the manufacturer’s data. Under cavitating flow conditions, the formation of vapor bubbles was observed on the suction side, starting at the leading edge of the blade and slowly forming as thin sheets towards the trailing edge as the suction pressure is reduced. Lastly, pressure fluctuations were observed from pressure coefficient data collected at several monitoring points in the volute and the impeller. It was seen that due to the interaction between the stationary casing and the rotating impeller, pulsations were equivalent to the blade passing frequency and its harmonics.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.