Background and Objectives: Minimally invasive procedures, such as double-J ureteric stenting, could be a promising therapeutic alternative to conservative management of obstructive urinary tract pathology. We aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of double-J ureteric stenting in pregnant women with ureterohydronephrosis or urolithiasis, along with their infectious complications, and to assess the pregnancy outcomes of this cohort of patients in comparison with a control group. Materials and Methods: This observational retrospective study included 52 pregnant patients who underwent double-J ureteric stenting for urologic disorders in the Urology Department of ‘C.I. Parhon’ University Hospital, and who were followed up at a tertiary maternity hospital- ‘Cuza-Voda’, Iasi, Romania. The control group (63 patients) was randomly selected from the patient’s cohort who gave birth in the same time frame at the maternity hospital, without urinary pathology. Clinical, sonographic, and laboratory variables were examined. Descriptive statistics, non-parametric tests, and a one-to-one propensity score-matched analysis were used to analyze our data. Results: The univariate analysis indicated a significant statistical difference between the control group and the interventional group regarding maternal age (p = 0.018), previous maternal history of renal colic (p = 0.005) or nephrolithiasis (p = 0.002). After applying the propensity score-matched analysis, cesarean delivery rates (p < 0.001), preterm labour (p = 0.039), premature rupture of membranes (p = 0.026), preterm birth rates (p = 0.002), and post-partum UTI rates (p = 0.012) were significantly different between the control group and the matched treatment group. Ureterohydronephrosis, whether simple (n = 37; 71.2%) or infected (n = 13; 25%), was the main indication for double-J ureteric stenting. Complications such as pain (n = 21; 40.3%), stent migration (n = 3; 5.76%) or encrustation (n = 2; 3.84%), as well as reflux pyelonephritis (n = 2; 3.84%) and gross hematuria (n = 1; 1.92%) were recorded during follow-up. Conclusions: Our results show that double-J stenting is a safe and effective treatment option for pregnant patients with obstructive urological disorders.
Background/Aim: Placenta percreta is a rare event, but it poses serious problems due to potential hemorrhagic events. We report a particular case of placenta percreta with massive hematuria due to maternal bladder invasion, and describe the surgical protocol performed that resulted in an excellent outcome. Case Report: A 33-yearold patient, at 27 th weeks gestational age, presented in the emergency room of the Urology Department with urinary blood clot acute retention, because of massive hematuria from a placenta percreta with bladder invasion. After extracting the clots from the bladder, and coagulation of an area of venous ectasies of the posterior wall, hematuria ceased, but appeared after two days, necessitating again the bladder clots removal and coagulation. A surgical team with gynecologists, urologists, anesthesiologists and a neonatologist was composed, and after bilateral ureteral double J insertion, cesarean section was performed followed by hemostatic hysterectomy and partial cystectomy, bilateral internal iliac artery ligature and repair of the bladder wall. The postoperative evolution was without incidents; the Foley catheter was removed in the 14 th postoperative day. Conclusion: In the context of a massive hematuria of a pregnant woman, the urologist must always consider a diagnosis of complicated placenta percreta.Placenta percreta represents the most severe form of abnormal trophoblastic adherence beyond the decidua basalis, among the three representatives of the placenta accreta spectrum (PAS), a rare condition with reported incidence of 1/500 to ½/500 pregnancies (1, 2). PAS includes 75-80% cases of placenta accreta vera (less than 50% myometrial invasion by the trophoblast), 17% cases of placenta increta (more than 50% myometrial invasion by the trophoblast), and 5% cases of percreta (invasion of uterine serosa and neighboring pelvic organs) (2, 3). Moreover, the abnormal adherence can be complete (throughout the entire placenta), partial (limited to only one or more cotyledons), or focal (in isolated areas) (4).More than 2 caesarean sections (CS), including shorter intervals between previous CS and current pregnancy (less than 2 years), and concurrent placenta praevia (in 75% of cases) are the most common known risk factors, followed by advanced maternal age, multiparity, endometritis, hypertension, assisted reproductive technology, submucosal leiomyomas, other uterine surgeries and anomalies (poor quality of scarring and CS performed on long time ruptured membranes leading to chorioamniotitis), smoking (3,(5)(6)(7)(8)(9). Because of the rise in the numbers of CS performed in recent years, the risk of PAS disorders is increasing up to 10 times in the last 50 years (10,11).The information regardless of treatment of the placenta percreta with bladder invasion are limited, because of the exceptional rarity of this event. Approximatively 70 cases are reported as case presentation, the largest series comprising 54 patients (12).
Background and Objectives: Acute urologic complications, including bladder and/or ureteric injury, are rare but known events occurring at the time of caesarean section (CS). Delayed or inadequate management is associated with increased morbidity and poor long-term outcomes. We conducted this study to identify the risk factors for urologic injuries at CS in order to inform obstetricians and patients of the risks and allow management planning to mitigate these risks. Materials and Methods: We reviewed all cases of urological injuries that occurred at CS surgeries in a tertiary university centre over a period of four years, from January 2016 to December 2019. To assess the risk factors of urologic injuries, a case-control study of women undergoing caesarean delivery was designed, matched 1:3 to randomly selected women who had an uncomplicated CS. Electronic medical records and operative reports were reviewed for socio-demographic and clinical information. Descriptive and univariate analyses were used to characterize the study population and identify the risk factors for urologic complications. Results: There were 36 patients with urologic complications out of 14,340 CS patients, with an incidence of 0.25%. The patients in the case group were older, had a lower gestational age at time of delivery and their newborns had a lower birth weight. Prior CS was more prevalent among the study group (88.2 vs. 66.7%), as was the incidence of placenta accreta and central praevia. In comparison with the control group, the intraoperative blood loss was higher in the case group, although there was no difference among the two groups regarding the type of surgery (emergency vs. elective), uterine rupture, or other obstetrical indications for CS. Prior CS and caesarean hysterectomy were risk factors for urologic injuries at CS. Conclusions: The major risk factor for urological injuries at the time of CS surgery is prior CS. Among patients with previous CS, those who undergo caesarean hysterectomy for placenta previa central and placenta accreta are at higher risk of surgical haemostasis and complex urologic injuries involving the bladder and the ureters.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.