Dermatoglyphics, the study of palm prints and fingerprints, is currently a precious method for the early detection of premalignant lesions, dental caries, systemic disorders, hereditary diseases, and syndromes. Palmar dermatoglyphics can indicate the development of potentially malignant lesions and help identify people at high risk of developing oral submucous fibrosis (OSMF) , and oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSSC), which cause panic and hold an excessively high ranking as killers. Another important condition that has become a major public health issue in the South Indian population is oral submucous fibrosis (OSMF), which is correlated with genetic abnormalities and is used in biomedical studies. Similarly, anthropologists and medical professionals have long found the study of the human hand fascinating, as have psychologists, novelists, artists, and chiromancers. Fingerprints do not change when the body decays, just as they change from birth to death. Our systematic review aims to assess the correlation between dermatoglyphics and oral precancerous and cancerous lesions in the human population and to investigate the embryogenesis and topology of dermatoglyphics, emphasizing the many types of research involving dermatoglyphics in many disciplines of medicine and dentistry. In our systematic review, we have collected many review papers using databases including PubMed, Medline, Scopus, Embase, and the Web of Science to determine the importance of dermatoglyphics in oral precancerous and cancerous lesions. The data from our systematic review showed a link between oral precancerous and cancerous lesions, which suggests that dermatoglyphics could be used to find precancerous and cancerous lesions in the oral cavity early.
In medical colleges, cadaveric dissection is an effective anatomy teaching method. Cadaveric dissections put students at the center of learning and show structures in their natural environment. However, most students dislike autopsy dissection since it's tedious and time-consuming. Thus, our study examined first-year medical students' attitudes toward dissection to learn anatomy. After the semester, students received a 3-domain questionnaire on preparedness, attitude, and restrictions. All information was gathered and recorded anonymously using Google forms. Each domain has many questions that add up to a score that shows how well they are prepared and how far online learning can go. One hundred MBBS first-year students participated in online anatomy lessons. After online courses, consenting students completed Google feedback forms regarding their experiences, which were examined and quantified. One hundred students completed the questionnaire and provided comments. Online courses were the most fantastic method to study human anatomy in medical school, according to 97.2%. Only 32.8% of students were uneasy, utilizing visuals to illustrate the softer aspects. Students' emotions and attitudes during corpse dissection varied by gender. Online was more appealing to males than women. Students prefer online courses over image-based ones because of the flexibility of time management and seating configuration. The statistical analysis revealed significant gender-related inequalities in student opinions. Other medical students showed similar variances at various phases of the research. The online anatomy classes for AVMC&H medical students were easy and enjoyable and utilized the "steeplechase" method. Our study shows the pros and cons of online education. Trainers/instructors should examine using online live forms as an instructional tool in anatomy training and generate new anatomy-related films for formal live teaching in the medical curriculum to accomplish this goal. However, additional study is needed to determine how much online education affects student learning and training.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.