Background: To compare the efficacy of phacoemulsification (PKE) combined with nonpenetrating deep sclerectomy (NPDS) with mitomycin C (MMC) versus XEN® gel stent with MMC. Methods: In this nonrandomized, retrospective, comparative, single-center pilot study, 105 consecutive eyes of 75 patients with uncontrolled primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and cataract who underwent PKE combined with either XEN implantation (n = 47) or NPDS (n = 58) between May 2013 and November 2018 were included. The primary outcome was complete success at 9 months, which was defined as intraocular pressure (IOP) ≤18, 15 or 12 mmHg without treatment; qualified success was IOP ≤18, 15 or 12 mmHg with antiglaucoma medications. Secondary outcome measures included the number of antiglaucoma medications, visual acuity (VA), and postoperative adverse events. Results: Using the 18 mmHg threshold, complete or qualified success was achieved in 69.6 and 89.1% in the PKE + XEN group, and 63.8 and 89.7% in the PKE + NPDS group (p = .54 and p = .93), respectively, at 9 months. The mean IOP decreased from 20.8 ± 6.8 mmHg to 16.2 ± 2.8 mmHg in the PKE + XEN group (p < .001, 18.9% mean drop), and from 21.5 ± 8.9 mmHg to 14.9 ± 3.9 mmHg in the PKE + NPDS group (p < .001, 25.6% mean drop). Best-corrected VA significantly improved (p < .001) in both groups. The mean number of antiglaucoma medications was significantly reduced from 2.66 ± 1.1 to 0.49 ± 1.0 in the PKE + XEN group (p < .001) and from 2.93 ± 0.9 to 0.69 ± 1.2 in the PKE + NPDS group (p < .001). Conclusions: The XEN stent combined with PKE seemed to be as effective and safe as PKE + NPDS at 9 months in this pilot study.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to report a case of recurrent conjunctival erosion and XEN Gel Stent exposure after implantation in a primary open-angle glaucoma patient. Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) is a new approach in glaucoma surgery, and there is a lack of published data with regard to the management of postoperative ocular surface complications. Methods: This is a case report of a patient with a persistent corneal erosion after XEN Gel Stent implantation. A standalone MIGS surgery was planned for both eyes in this case of refractory glaucoma. Despite a first surgical revision, the patient was suffering from a chronic leaking bleb, an exposed XEN Gel Stent, and severe hypotonia in the left eye. Results: A free conjunctival autografting technique covered with a complementary amniotic membrane graft was performed under local anesthesia. One month following bleb revision, the intraocular pressure was 13 mm Hg on medical treatment, and slit-lamp examination showed a well-formed moderate bleb with no leakage. Conclusions: This is the first described case of the use of a free conjunctival autograft to treat a persistently leaking bleb after XEN Gel Stent implantation. This case highlights the potential complication of conjunctival erosion due to XEN Gel Stent implantation. It emphasizes the management of complicated filtration blebs after MIGS surgery.

Introduction. To assess the safety and efficacy of selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) for ocular hypertension (OHT) induced by a dexamethasone (DEX) intravitreal implant. Materials and Methods. We performed a retrospective study of patients who underwent an SLT procedure for ocular hypertension induced by injection of a DEX intravitreal implant. Patients had, at least, one injection of the DEX-implant for symptomatic macular edema. SLT was delivered to 360° of the trabecular meshwork in two sessions. The primary outcome was a decrease in IOP, evaluated at one, three, and six months after the SLT procedure. Results. Twenty-six eyes of 22 patients were included. The mean intraocular pressure (IOP) measured after DEX-implant injection was 25.4 ± 5.4 mmHg, and the mean increase in IOP was 35.8 ± 14.6%. The mean follow-up after SLT was 18.3 ± 7.7 months. After SLT, the mean IOP dropped by 30.9% at one month (16.9 ± 4.5 mmHg, p = 0.01 ), 33.6% at three months (16.0 ± 2.7 mmHg, p < 0.01 ), and 34.9% at six months (15.6 ± 2.1 mmHg, p < 0.01 ). Each patient had a minimum follow-up of 6 months after SLT. Eight eyes (31%) received a second DEX-implant injection after the SLT procedure without experiencing an increase in the IOP above 21 mmHg or >20%. No glaucoma surgery was required during the follow-up. The mean number of medications (1.65 ± 1.36) was significantly reduced at one (1.19 ± 1.20, p = 0.04 ), three (0.96 ± 1.03, p < 0.01 ), and six months (0.77 ± 0.95, p < 0.01 ) after SLT. Conclusion. SLT is an effective and safe procedure to control OHT following DEX-implant intravitreal injection.

Background and Objectives: Secondary ocular localizations of hematological malignancies are blinding conditions with a poor prognosis, and often result in a delay in the diagnosis. Materials and Methods: We describe a series of rare cases of ocular involvement in six patients with hematological malignancies, reportedly in remission, who presented secondary ocular localizations, challenging to diagnose. Two patients had an acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and developed either a posterior scleritis or a pseudo-panuveitis with ciliary process infiltration. One patient had iris plasmacytoma and developed an anterior uveitis as a secondary presentation. Two patients had a current systemic diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and were referred either for intermediate uveitis or for papilledema and vitritis with secondary retinitis. Finally, one patient with an acute myeloid leukemia (AML) presented a conjunctival localization of a myeloid sarcoma. We herein summarize the current knowledge of ophthalmologic manifestations of extramedullary hematopathies. Results: Inflammatory signs were associated with symptomatic infiltrative lesions well displayed in either the iris, the retina, the choroid, or the cavernous sinus, from the admission of the patients in the ophthalmological department. These findings suggest that patients with ALL, AML, systemic DLBCL, and myeloma can present with ophthalmic involvement, even after having been reported as in remission following an effective systemic treatment and/or allograft. Conclusions: Early detection of hidden recurrence in the eyes may permit effective treatment. Furthermore, oncologists and ophthalmologists should be aware of those rare ocular malignant locations when monitoring patient’s progression after initial treatment, and close ophthalmologic examinations should be recommended when detecting patient’s ocular symptoms after treatment.

PurposeTo evaluate results at one year of selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) on intraocular pressure (IOP) and assess if differences are related to number of topical treatments in ocular hypertension (OHT) and open angle glaucoma (OAG) patients.MethodsWe performed a retrospective chart review of 106 eyes treated by SLT. Indications for SLT treatment were insufficient IOP control, allergy, discomfort or non‐compliance to antiglaucoma treatment. Only patients with at least 1 year of follow‐up after SLT were included. IOP was measured before and at 1, 6 and 12 months after SLT. All IOP measurements were performed with Goldmann applanation tonometry.Results106 eyes of 68 patients untreated (n = 13), or treated with one (n = 25), two (n = 39) or three (n = 28) topical antiglaucoma medications were included. Mean preoperative IOP was 19.4 ± 3.6 mmHg (respectively 21.1 ± 2.7, 19.8 ± 3.1, 19.1 ± 4.2 and 18.9 ± 3.4 mmHg corresponding to the group without, one, two or three treatments) and 15.7 ± 3.1 mmHg at 12 months (respectively 16.2 ± 3.5, 15.6 ± 2.6, 15.6 ± 3.4 and 15.5 ± 2.8 mmHg for each groups) which corresponds to an average decrease of 18.3% (respectively 23.7%, 19.7%, 17.2% and 16.1% for each groups). At 1 year, 62.2% (n = 66) were responders (≥3 mmHg reduction from baseline IOP = 15.5% of IOP baseline): 92.3% without treatment (n = 12), 68% with one (n = 17), 59% with two (n = 23) and 50% with three treatments (n = 14). The average IOP of responders decreased from 20.7 ± 3.4 to 15.2 ± 2.9 mmHg (26.6%), respectively from 20.8 ± 2.6 to 15.8 ± 3.2 (25%) without treatment, from 20.6 ± 3.2 to 14.9 ± 3.7 (27.3%) with one, from 20.8 ± 4.1 to 15.5 ± 3.3 (25.1%) with two and from 20.7 ± 3.2 to 14.4 ± 2.4 mmHg (29.7%) with three treatments.ConclusionsLowering of IOP and number of responders after SLT appears to be more important un OHT and OAG patients with less topical antiglaucoma treatment.

No abstract

PurposeTo determine the full range of ophthalmological clinical manifestations in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and to compare the systemic features associated with them.MethodsFiles of 13 patients with ocular SLE (n = 20 eyes) diagnosed as per the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 2012 revised criteria were retrospectively reviewed.ResultsThe following clinical manifestations were found: keratoconjunctivitis sicca (n = three patients), anterior uveitis associated with an inflammatory pseudo-tumor orbital mass (n = one patient, one eye), episcleritis and periorbital edema (n = one patient, two eyes), posterior scleritis (n = one patient, two eyes), bilateral papillary edema in the context of idiopathic intracranial hypertension (n = one patient, one eye), inflammatory optic neuritis (n = one patient, one eye), and lupus retinopathies with varying degrees of capillary occlusions mainly arteriolar (n = seven patients, 13 eyes) and larger arteries or veins (retinal arteries occlusions and retinal veins occlusions) (n = one patient, two eyes). Some patients presented with combined ophthalmological manifestations.Systemic SLE was discovered by its ophthalmic manifestation in three cases (23%) and was previously known in the other 10 cases (77%). On average, ocular symptoms were seen 8 years after the initial diagnosis of SLE. Other systemic SLE disorders included cutaneous disorders (77%), joint disorders (38%), central nervous system (CNS) disorders (23%), renal disorders (38%), and oral ulcers (23%).Treatment of the ophthalmic system manifestations of lupus included local steroid therapies along with systemic immunosuppression.The most common laboratory ACR criteria were: high levels of antinuclear antibodies (ANA) (100%), positive anti-Sm (64%), anti-dsDNA (27%), low complement levels (27%), and positive antiphospholipid (APL) antibodies (18%).DiscussionSLE activity in the ophthalmic system is characterized by its functional severity and the range of involvement can be categorized by anatomical involvement: presence of anterior uveitis, episcleritis, scleritis, periorbital edema, posterior uveitis with retinal vascular ischemia, or papillary edema. Not currently part of the diagnosis criteria of the SLE ACR given its rarity, the ocular localization of the pathology led to the diagnosis of SLE in three cases; thus, developing a greater understanding of ocular lupus may help in identifying and treating systemic manifestations of lupus earlier.

No abstract