Background. Thrombosis of the central veins is one of the most frequent complications of implanted venous access devices. Among the first cases occurring in our patients, most were associated with left‐sided placement of the ports, with catheter tips lying against the external wall in the upper half of the superior vena cava. Some chest radiographs showed lateromediastinal opacities centered on the catheter tip, suggesting a vessel injury. This position allows a narrow contact between the catheter tip and the vessel wall, thus endothelial injuries might result from mechanical and chemical attack. Methods. To assess the role of catheter position, we reviewed the routine chest radiographs of 379 patients who received chemotherapy through venous access devices and were followed up at our department between December 1985 and December 1990. Four groups (upper left, upper right, lower left, and lower right) were defined according to the level of the catheter tip (innominate veins or upper half of the vena cava versus lower half of the vena cava or auricula) and to the side of port implantation. Results. Ten patients developed symptomatic venous thrombosis (superior vena cava in 9 patient, left subclavian vein in 1 patient). A strong correlation existed between catheter position and incidence of thrombosis: upper left, 8/28 (28.6%); upper right, 1/33 (3%); lower right, 1/68 (1.5%); and lower left, 0/250. Since 1988, we have insisted on replacement of malpositioned catheters, and we have observed fewer thromboses (2/191 versus 8/188). Conclusions. The current study suggests that patients with left‐sided ports and catheter tips lying in the upper part of the vena cava are at high risk for severe thrombotic complications.

To assess with truly long follow-up the long-term results of valve replacement with the St. Jude Medical prosthesis (St. Jude Medical, Inc., St. Paul, Minn.), we reviewed the case histories of the first 1112 patients undergoing 1244 valve replacements with this valve between June 12, 1978, and June 12, 1987: 690 male (62%) and 422 female patients, mean age 56 years. A total of 773 patients (69%) had the aortic valve replaced, 207 (19%) the mitral valve, and 132 (12%) the aortic and mitral valves. There were 42 hospital deaths (3.8%). Follow-up was 97.5% complete (8988 patient-years). There were 213 late deaths. Ninety-one (43%) were considered valve-related: sudden death, n = 27; anticoagulant-related hemorrhage, n = 22; thromboembolism, n = 19; prosthetic valve endocarditis, n = 13; valve thrombosis, n = 9; and noninfectious perivalvular leak, n = 1. Overall actuarial survival, including hospital mortality, was 68% +/- 6% (95% confidence limits) 14 years after the operation. Linearized rates of late valve-related events were as follows: thromboembolism, 1.09% per patient-year; anticoagulant-related hemorrhage, 0.94% per patient-year; prosthetic valve endocarditis, 0.32% per patient-year; valve thrombosis, 0.33% per patient-year; and perivalvular leak, 0.19% per patient-year. Actuarial freedom, at 14 years, from thromboembolism was 89% +/- 3%, anticoagulant-related hemorrhage 83% +/- 8%, valve thrombosis 97% +/- 1%, and reoperation 95% +/- 3%. Actuarial freedom from all valve-related deaths and valve-related morbidity and mortality, at 14 years, was 84% +/- 6% and 61% +/- 8%, respectively. We conclude that, because of its low thrombogenicity, low incidence of valve-related events, and low valve-related mortality, the St. Jude Medical valve is one of the best performing mechanical prosthesis currently available. Nevertheless, the late valve-related complications and deaths illustrate that the quest for a "perfect" prosthesis remains unfulfilled.

No abstract

Aims Optimizing medical cardiac treatment for sleep apnoea (SA) in patients with chronic heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is an expert Grade C recommendation based on six studies encompassing a total of 67 patients only. Whether sacubitril-valsartan (SV), a cornerstone of HFrEF medical treatment, impacts SA is unknown and requires evaluation. Methods and resultsThe ENTRESTO-SAS trial is a six-centre, prospective, open-label real-life cohort study (NCT02916160). Ambulatory patients eligible for SV (i.e. HFrEF adults who remain symptomatic despite optimal treatment) were evaluated before and after 3 months of SV (including nocturnal ventilatory polygraphy); 118 patients were final analysed [median age was 66 (IQ 25-75 : 56-73) years, 81.4% male, 36.5% New York Heart Association III-IV, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide level of 1564 (701-3376) ng/L, left ventricular ejection fraction of 30 (25-34)%, 60.7% ischaemic HFrEF, 97.5% initially treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers, 83.9% with beta-blockers, 64.4% with mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and 74.6% with diuretics]. Three groups were defined according to initial central/obstructive apnoea-hypopnoea indices (AHIs): G1 (n = 49, AHI central ≥ 5/h and AHI obstructive < 15/h); G2 (n = 27, AHI obstructive ≥ 15/h); and G3 (n = 42, AHI central < 5/h and AHI obstructive < 15/h). At 3 months, the AHI (main predefined outcome) decreased significantly by À7.10/h (IQ 25-75 : À16.10 to 0.40; P < 0.001) in G1 + G2 without positive airway pressure treatment (45 patients, median initial AHI of 24.20 (IQ 25-75 : 16.40-43.50)/h). Of these, 24.4% presented an AHI decrease ≥50% and 37.78% had a final AHI < 15/h (tendency for improvement from an initial value of 20%: P = 0.0574). For G1 patients (n = 37), AHI significantly decreased from a median of 22.90 (16.00-43.50)/h to 19.20 (12.70-31.10)/h (P = 0.002). For G2 patients (n = 8), AHI decreased from a median of 30.10 (26.40-47.60)/h to 22.75 (14.60-36.90)/h (statistically non-significant, P = 0.059). Conclusions In this real-life population, SV treatment for 3 months in SA patients is associated with a significant decrease in AHI. These results support the current guidelines that recommend first an optimization of the HFrEF treatment in patients with HFrEF and central SA. A potential positive airway pressure sparing effect merits further investigation.