BACKGROUND:
Lymphovascular invasion and perineural invasion are histopathological features associated with higher-risk colon cancer.
OBJECTIVE:
The purpose of this study was to quantify the impact of lymphovascular and perineural invasion on overall survival after diagnosis and to determine the protective effect of adjuvant chemotherapy for early adenocarcinoma with high-risk factors.
DESIGN:
This was a retrospective database review of the 2010–2014 National Cancer Database for colon cancer.
SETTINGS:
Individuals diagnosed with invasive adenocarcinoma of the colon (histology code 8140) with primary surgical resection with >12 nodes harvested and no positive nodes on pathological examination were included.
PATIENTS:
A total of 32,493 patients underwent surgical resection for stage II adenocarcinoma of the colon.
INTERVENTIONS:
The study involved multivariate Cox regression analysis of the impact of lymphovascular and perineural invasion and adjuvant chemotherapy on overall survival after a diagnosis of stage II adenocarcinoma of the colon.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:
Survival after a diagnosis of stage II adenocarcinoma of the colon was measured.
RESULTS:
Five-year survival after diagnosis and surgical resection without adjuvant chemotherapy was lower for patients with lymphovascular (60.0%), perineural (56.9%), and lymphovascular and perineural invasion (55.8%) compared with double-negative disease (66.1%). Log-rank testing confirmed that adjuvant chemotherapy improved 5-year survival after diagnosis for lymphovascular (85.5%), perineural (83.6%), and lymphovascular and perineural invasion (74.3%). After controlling for differences in cohorts, Cox regression analysis showed an increased HR for mortality of 14.0% for lymphovascular (HR = 1.141 (95% CI, 1.060–1.228)), 32.1% for perineural (HR = 1.321 (95% CI, 1.176–1.483)), and 41.0% for lymphovascular and perineural invasion (HR = 1.409 (95% CI, 1.231–1.612)) compared with having neither. Chemotherapy showed a 43% reduction in hazard for mortality (HR = 0.570 (95% CI, 0.513–0.633)).
LIMITATIONS:
The study was limited by its retrospective review and observational bias.
CONCLUSIONS:
Lymphovascular and perineural invasion have a detrimental effect on survival after diagnosis of stage II adenocarcinoma of the colon. Chemotherapy may be protective specifically when lymphovascular and perineural invasion are present. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A786.
BackgroundThe primary objective of this study was to retrospectively compare short-term outcomes of intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis for minimally invasive laparoscopic and robotic-assisted right colectomies for benign and malignant disease. Recent studies suggest potential short-term outcomes advantages for the intracorporeal anastomosis technique.MethodsThis is a multicenter retrospective propensity score-matched comparison of intracorporeal and extracorporeal anastomosis techniques for laparoscopic and robotic-assisted right colectomy between January 11, 2010, and July 21, 2016.ResultsAfter propensity score-matching, there were a total of 1029 minimal invasive surgery cases for analysis—379 right colectomies (335 robotic-assisted and 44 laparoscopic) done with an intracorporeal anastomosis and 650 right colectomies (253 robotic-assisted and 397 laparoscopic) done with an extracorporeal anastomosis. There were no significant differences in any preoperative patient characteristics between groups. The minimally invasive intracorporeal anastomosis group had significantly longer operative times (p<0.0001), lower conversion to open rate (p = 0.01), shorter hospital length of stay (p = 0.02) and lower complication rate from after discharge to 30-days (p = 0.04) than the extracorporeal anastomosis group.ConclusionsThis comparison shows several clinical outcomes advantages for the intracorporeal anastomosis technique in minimally invasive right colectomy. These data may guide future refinements in minimally invasive training techniques and help surgeons choose among different minimally invasive options.
As the robotic platform continues to grow in colorectal surgery and as technical upgrades continue to advance, comparison of outcomes requires continuous reevaluation. This study demonstrated that robotic operations have longer operative times, decreased hospital length of stay, and decreased rates of conversion to open in the pelvis. These findings warrant continued evaluation of the role of minimally invasive technical upgrades in colorectal surgery.
There is no difference in conversion to laparotomy and overall complication rates in non-obese and obese patients undergoing robotic-assisted colorectal surgery. However, obesity is associated with a higher prevalence of wound complications. Robotic-assisted surgery may minimize conversion to laparotomy and complications typically seen in obese patients due to improved visualization, instrumentation, and ergonomics.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS-We studied interactions among proteins of the carcinoembryonic antigen related cell adhesion molecule (CEACAM) family, which interact with microbes, and transforming growth factor beta (TGFB) signaling pathway, which is often altered in colorectal cancer cells. We investigated mechanisms by which CEACAM proteins inhibit TGFB signaling and alter the intestinal microbiome to promote colorectal carcinogenesis.METHODS-We collected data on DNA sequences, mRNA expression levels, and patient survival times from 456 colorectal adenocarcinoma cases, and a separate set of 594 samples of colorectal adenocarcinomas, in the Cancer Genome Atlas. We performed shotgun metagenomic *
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.