Background: There is an increase of serum levels of IgE during Plasmodium falciparum infections in individuals living in endemic areas. These IgEs either protect against malaria or increase malaria pathogenesis. To get an insight into the exact role played by IgE in the outcome of P. falciparum infection, total IgE levels and functional anti-parasite IgE response were studied in children and adults, from two different endemic areas Gabon and India, exhibiting either uncomplicated malaria, severe non cerebral malaria or cerebral malaria, in comparison with control individuals.
Many countries in Africa are now confronted with the dilemma of shifting drug policies for uncomplicated falciparum malaria from chloroquine, which has become largely ineffective, to a new first-line drug and amodiaquine is one of the possible options. A multicentre, open-label randomized controlled trial of amodiaquine 30 mg/kg vs chloroquine 25 mg/kg over 3 days was performed in Senegal, Cameroon, Gabon, and Burkina Faso between 1996 and 1998 and patients were followed-up for 14 days. Sensitivity of isolates in vitro and whole blood levels of chloroquine and amodiaquine were also measured. The primary efficacy parameter was parasitological clearance on day 14 (parasitological success). The secondary efficacy parameter was absence of signs/symptoms of malaria on day 14 (clinical success). Among the 364 patients randomized and receiving the assigned treatment (chloroquine n = 185, amodiaquine n = 179), 137 and 139, respectively, reached the primary endpoint. Amodiaquine proved significantly more effective than chloroquine. The summary odds ratio (95% CI) was 7.79 (4.54-13.35) for parasitological success, and 6.3 (3.4-11.68) for clinical success. Sensitivity in vitro and chloroquine blood levels were good predictors of chloroquine failure. Amodiaquine remains effective for treating uncomplicated falciparum malaria in areas of West and Central Africa where chloroquine resistance is prevalent. However, measures should be taken to protect the lifespan of amodiaquine where the drug is introduced for use.
BackgroundHypergammaglobulinemia and polyclonal B-cell activation commonly occur in Plasmodium sp. infections. Some of the antibodies produced recognize self-components and are correlated with disease severity in P. falciparum malaria. However, it is not known whether some self-reactive antibodies produced during P. falciparum infection contribute to the events leading to cerebral malaria (CM). We show here a correlation between self-antibody responses to a human brain protein and high levels of circulating TNF alpha (TNFα), with the manifestation of CM in Gabonese children.MethodologyTo study the role of self-reactive antibodies associated to the development of P. falciparum cerebral malaria, we used a combination of quantitative immunoblotting and multivariate analysis to analyse correlation between the reactivity of circulating IgG with a human brain protein extract and TNFα concentrations in cohorts of uninfected controls (UI) and P. falciparum-infected Gabonese children developing uncomplicated malaria (UM), severe non-cerebral malaria (SNCM), or CM.Results/ConclusionThe repertoire of brain antigens recognized by plasma IgGs was more diverse in infected than in UI individuals. Anti-brain reactivity was significantly higher in the CM group than in the UM and SNCM groups. IgG self-reactivity to brain antigens was also correlated with plasma IgG levels and age. We found that 90% of CM patients displayed reactivity to a high-molecular mass band containing the spectrin non-erythroid alpha chain. Reactivity with this band was correlated with high TNFα concentrations in CM patients. These results strongly suggest that an antibody response to brain antigens induced by P. falciparum infection may be associated with pathogenic mechanisms in patients developing CM.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.