We report experimental implementation of a protocol for testing the Leggett-Garg inequality (LGI) for nuclear spins precessing in an external magnetic field. The implementation involves certain controlled operations, performed in parallel on pairs of spin-1/2 nuclei (target and probe) from molecules of a nuclear magnetic resonance ensemble, which enable evaluation of temporal correlations from an LG string. Our experiment demonstrates violation of the LGI for time intervals between successive measurements, over which the effects of relaxation on the quantum state of target spin are negligible. Further, it is observed that the temporal correlations decay, and the same target spin appears to display macrorealistic behavior consistent with LGI.
In this paper we investigate the effect of many Rayleigh scattering events on decoherence of superpositions of chiral states of a molecule, by taking these events as measurement-like interactions in the sense that the scattered photon state depends on the state of the molecule—both its centre-of-mass position and its chirality. This gives rise to two contributions to decoherence: one due to the position measurement and the other due to the chirality measurement. It is found that under identical conditions, the decoherence timescale for chiral molecules can be different from that for achiral molecules depending on the chiral sensitivity of scattering.
This paper is a straightforward generalization of Maierle-Harris proposal regarding parity implications on the superpositions of chiral states of a molecule. It is shown that the inclusion of electric quadrupole and magnetic dipole interactions removes several of restrictions on the preparation of superpositions of mid R:L and mid R:R states of a chiral molecule. It is also found that the dephasing of mid R:L and mid R:R superpositions, due to the spontaneous emission from the chiral molecule, has opposing contributions from electric quadrupole-magnetic dipole and electric dipole interactions.
Since the beginning of the 21st century, a new interdisciplinary research movement has started, which aims at developing quantum math-like (or simply quantum-like) models to provide an explanation for a variety of socio-economic processes and human behaviour. By making use of mainly the probabilistic aspects of quantum theory, this research movement has led to many important results in the areas of decision-making and finance. In this article, we introduce a novel and more exhaustive approach, to analyze the socio-economic processes and activities, than the pure quantum math-like modelling approach, by taking into account the physical foundations of quantum theory. We also provide a plausibility argument for its exhaustiveness in terms of what we can expect from such an approach, when it is applied to, for example, a generic socio-economic decision process.
In this article, we assert that, for the construction of quantum
physics
-analogous (as opposed to quantum
math
-analogous) probabilistic models of the social (e.g. economics–financial) reality, the use of the notion of causality and the idea of an ensemble of similarly prepared systems in a socially analogous manner could be essential. We give plausibility arguments in favour of this assertion by considering two social situations describable in terms of discrete-time stochastic (i.e. Markov) processes. The first one is an arbitrary economics/financial context expressed as a temporal sequence of actualized social states (e.g. decisions, choices, preferences, etc.). The other one is more specific, involving a generic supply chain context.
This article is part of the theme issue ‘Thermodynamics 2.0: Bridging the natural and social sciences (Part 1)’.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.