No abstract

The objective of this study is to evaluate the heterogeneity in pharmacodynamic response in four in vitro multiple myeloma cell lines to treatment with bortezomib, and to assess whether such differences are associated with drug-induced intracellular signaling protein dynamics identified via a logic-based network modeling approach. The in vitro pharmacodynamic-efficacy of bortezomib was evaluated through concentration-effect and cell proliferation dynamical studies in U266, RPMI8226, MM.1S, and NCI-H929 myeloma cell lines. A Boolean logic-based network model incorporating intracellular protein signaling pathways relevant to myeloma cell growth, proliferation, and apoptosis was developed based on information available in the literature and used to identify key proteins regulating bortezomib pharmacodynamics. The time-course of network-identified proteins was measured using the MAGPIX protein assay system. Traditional pharmacodynamic modeling endpoints revealed variable responses of the cell lines to bortezomib treatment, classifying cell lines as more sensitive (MM.1S and NCI-H929) and less sensitive (U266 and RPMI8226). Network centrality and model reduction identified key proteins (e.g., phosphorylated nuclear factor-B, phosphorylated protein kinase B, phosphorylated mechanistic target of rapamycin, Bcl-2, phosphorylated c-Jun N-terminal kinase, phosphorylated p53, p21, phosphorylated Bcl-2-associated death promoter, caspase 8, and caspase 9) that govern bortezomib pharmacodynamics. The corresponding relative expression (normalized to 0-hour untreated-control cells) of proteins demonstrated a greater magnitude and earlier onset of stimulation/inhibition in cells more sensitive (MM.1S and NCI-H929) to bortezomib-induced cell death at 20 nM, relative to the less sensitive cells (U266 and RPMI8226). Overall, differences in intracellular signaling appear to be associated with bortezomib pharmacodynamic heterogeneity, and key proteins may be potential biomarkers to evaluate bortezomib responses.

A variety of marketed drugs belonging to various therapeutic classes are known to cause nephrotoxicity. Nephrotoxicity can manifest itself in several forms depending on the specific site involved as well as the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms. As they often coexist with other pathophysiological conditions, the steps that can be taken to treat them are often limited. Thus, drug-induced nephrotoxicity remains a major clinical challenge. Prior knowledge of risk factors associated with special patient populations and specific classes of drugs, combined with early diagnosis, therapeutic drug monitoring with dose adjustments, as well as timely prospective treatments are essential to prevent and manage them better. Most incident drug-induced renal toxicity is reversible only if diagnosed at an early stage and treated promptly. Hence, diagnosis at an early stage is the need of the hour to counter it. Significant recent advances in the identification of novel early biomarkers of nephrotoxicity are not beyond limitations. In such a scenario, mathematical modeling and simulation (M&S) approaches may help to better understand and predict toxicities in a clinical setting. This review summarizes pathophysiological mechanisms of drug-induced nephrotoxicity, classes of nephrotoxic drugs, management, prevention, and diagnosis in clinics. Finally, it also highlights some of the recent advancements in mathematical M&S approaches that could be used to better understand and predict drug-induced nephrotoxicity.

The heterogeneous polyclonal nature of multiple myeloma complicates the identification of protein biomarkers predictive of drug response. In this study, a pharmacodynamic systems modeling approach was used to link in vitro bortezomib exposure and myeloma cell death. The exposure‐response was integrated through a network of important protein biomarker dynamics activated by bortezomib in four myeloma cell lines. The pharmacodynamic models reasonably characterized the protein and myeloma cell dynamics simultaneously following bortezomib (20 nM) treatment. The models were used to identify differences in pathway dynamics across cell lines from model‐estimated protein biomarker turnover parameters and global sensitivity analyses. Additionally, a statistical correlation analysis between drug sensitivity and model‐fitted protein activation profiles (i.e., cumulative area under the protein expression‐time curves) supported the identification of shared biomarkers associated with sensitivity differences among the cell lines. Both types of analysis identified similar important proteins associated with bortezomib pharmacodynamics, such as phosphorylated Nuclear Factor kappa‐light‐chain‐enhancer of activated B cells (pNFkappaB), phosphorylated protein kinase B (pAKT), and caspase‐8 (Cas 8).

No abstract