Objective To examine the association between obesity subtypes and risk of early and late pre-eclampsia.Design Population-based retrospective study.Setting State of Missouri maternally linked birth cohort files.Population All singleton live births in the state of Missouri from 1989 to 2005.Methods The body mass index (BMI) was used to classify women as normal weight (BMI = 18.5-24.9 kg/m 2 ), class I obesity (BMI = 30-34.9 kg/m 2 ), class II obesity (BMI = 35-39.9 kg/m 2 ), class III obesity (BMI = 40-49.9 kg/m 2 ) or super-obesity (BMI ‡ 50 kg/m 2 ). Adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between obesity and the risk of pre-eclampsia were obtained from logistic regression models with adjustment for intracluster correlation.Results The rate of pre-eclampsia increased with increasing BMI, with super-obese women having the highest incidence (13.4%).Compared with normal weight women, obese women (BMI ‡ 30 kg/m 2 ) had a higher risk for pre-eclampsia (OR = 2.59, 95% CI = 2.87-3.01). This risk remained approximately the same for late-onset pre-eclampsia (preeclampsia occurring at 34 weeks or more of gestation) and was slightly reduced for early-onset pre-eclampsia (pre-eclampsia occurring at 34 weeks or less of gestation). Within each BMI category, the risk of pre-eclampsia increased with the rate of weight gain. Compared with normal weight mothers with moderate weight gain, super-obese women with a high rate of weight gain had the greatest risk for pre-eclampsia (OR = 7.52, 95% CI = 2.70-21.0).Conclusion BMI and rate of weight gain are synergistic risk factors that amplify the burden of pre-eclampsia among super-obese women.
Objective
The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of transabdominal sonography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for prenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta.
Methods
A historical cohort study was undertaken at 3 institutions identifying women at risk for placenta accreta who had undergone both sonography and MRI prenatally. Sonographic and MRI findings were compared with the final diagnosis as determined at delivery and by pathologic examination.
Results
Thirty-two patients who had both sonography and MRI prenatally to evaluate for placenta accreta were identified. Of these, 15 had confirmation of placenta accreta at delivery. Sonography correctly identified the presence of placenta accreta in 14 of 15 patients (93% sensitivity; 95% confidence interval [CI], 80%–100%) and the absence of placenta accreta in 12 of 17 patients (71% specificity; 95% CI, 49%–93%). Magnetic resonance imaging correctly identified the presence of placenta accreta in 12 of 15 patients (80% sensitivity; 95% CI, 60%–100%) and the absence of placenta accreta in 11 of 17 patients (65% specificity; 95% CI, 42%–88%). In 7 of 32 cases, sonography and MRI had discordant diagnoses: sonography was correct in 5 cases, and MRI was correct in 2. There was no statistical difference in sensitivity (P = .25) or specificity (P = .5) between sonography and MRI.
Conclusions
Both sonography and MRI have fairly good sensitivity for prenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta; however, specificity does not appear to be as good as reported in other studies. In the case of inconclusive findings with one imaging modality, the other modality may be useful for clarifying the diagnosis.
Although prior bariatric surgery is associated with multiple negative maternal and fetal outcomes, it is protective against infant macrosomia in obese mothers. Our findings support the need for preconception/interconception services tailored for former bariatric surgery patients to improve maternal and feto-infant health outcomes.
Prenatal alcohol use is a risk factor for preterm delivery, and especially for spontaneous preterm birth. These findings enhance our understanding of the aetiology of preterm birth and could be utilized in the development of appropriate prevention strategies that will assist in decreasing perinatal mortality and morbidity associated with preterm delivery.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.