No abstract

Objectives: To investigate the association between the grade of diastolic dysfunction (DD) and the occurrence of early allograft dysfunction (EAD) in liver transplant patients following the new 2016 American Society of Echocardiography/European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (ASE/EACVI) guidelines. Methods: From January 2015 to December 2019, we retrospectively analyzed 83 patients who underwent orthotopic liver transplantation (OLTx) and their susceptibility to develop EAD according to the grade of preoperative DD. EAD was defined according to the criteria proposed by Olfhoff et al.; DD was defined with four parameters: E/A, e/e’, Left Atrium volume, and Tricuspid Regurgitation velocity. Results: According to the ASE/EACVI guidelines grade II DD was detected in 20 patients (24.1%) undergoing OLTx. A statistically significant association was found between grade II DD and the occurrence of EAD (p‐value < 0.003). The Kaplan‐Meier analysis failed to find any significant difference between the survival probability, nevertheless at the end of a 90‐day follow‐up period, mortality showed a different trend in classes with more severe diastolic dysfunction. Conclusion: According to the ASE/EACVI guidelines from 2016, patients with grade II DD seem to have a higher propensity to develop early allograft dysfunction EAD after OLTx. Our study advises a need for an urgent prospective multicenter study to elucidate the long‐term outcomes of liver transplants patients with diastolic dysfunction.

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Background Despite current advances in liver transplant surgery, post-operative early allograft dysfunction still complicates the patient prognosis and graft survival. The transition from the donor has not been yet fully understood, and no study quantifies if and how the liver function changes through its transfer to the recipient. The indocyanine green dye plasma disappearance rate (ICG-PDR) is a simple validated tool of liver function assessment. The variation rate between the donor and recipient ICG-PDR still needs to be investigated. Materials and methods Single-center retrospective study. ICG-PDR determinations were performed before graft retrieval (T1) and 24 hours after transplant (T2). The ICG-PDR relative variation rate between T1 and T2 was calculated to assess the graft function and suffering/recovering. Matched data were compared with the MEAF model of graft dysfunction. Objective To investigate whether the variation rate between the donor ICG-PDR value and the recipient ICG-PDR measurement on first postoperative day (POD1) can be associated with the MEAF score. Results 36 ICG-PDR measurements between 18 donors and 18 graft recipients were performed. The mean donor ICG-PDR was 22.64 (SD 6.35), and the mean receiver’s ICG-PDR on 1st POD was 17.68 (SD 6.60), with a mean MEAF value of 4.51 (SD 1.23). Pearson’s test stressed a good, linear inverse correlation between the ICG-PDR relative variation and the MEAF values, correlation coefficient -0.580 (p = 0.012). Conclusion The direct correlation between the donor to recipient ICG-PDR variation rate and MEAF was found. Measurements at T1 and T2 showed an up- or downtrend of the graft performance that reflect the MEAF values.

No abstract