Esta atualização da Diretriz de Insuficiência Cardíaca Crônica (IC) - 2012 surge para reavaliar as recomendações através de uma avaliação criteriosa das pesquisas (considerando-se a qualidade dos estudos), fundamental para que se atinja esse propósito. Para tanto, foi dada ênfase ao efeito em desfechos de morte, à qualidade "CONSORT" (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials), à descrição qualitativa e quantitativa da otimização da medicação, à população realmente incluída, às metanálises somente de estudos qualidade "CONSORT", à custo-efetividade, à existência de efeito de classe, ao número de pacientes incluídos e à análise de subgrupos apenas para gerar hipóteses. Na área da epidemiologia, as recentes abordagens das características da IC com fração de ejeção preservada (ICFEP) e da importância da IC como causa de morte no Brasil foram revisadas. Além disso, este documento contempla a reavaliação do valor dos biomarcadores no diagnóstico e no seguimento da IC, o papel diagnóstico da angiotomografia coronariana nos casos de risco intermediário ou baixo risco de doença coronariana, a não recomendação de rotina do telemonitoramento; o surgimento da avaliação familiar como recomendação importante, e a reavaliação da restrição da adição de sal na dieta. As clínicas de IC e reabilitação física, apesar de alguns resultados negativos ou controversos quanto à mortalidade, continuam com recomendação importante. No campo do tratamento farmacológico, abrange-se a reavaliação da indicação do nebivolol, introduz-se a ivabradina como um novo paradigma no tratamento, os antagonistas da aldosterona não têm efeito de classe reconhecido, o ômega 3 passa a ser recomendado, o ferro administrado por via endovenosa e o sildenafil recebem indicação em casos selecionados. Todas as recomendações para outras etiologias são expandidas para a Doença de Chagas. Na área da anticoagulação, recomenda-se a utilização dos escores CHA2DS2VASC e o HAS-BLED na fibrilação atrial, com introdução de inibidores da trombina e do fator Xa como alternativas na anticoagulação. No tratamento cirúrgico da IC, considerou-se que resultados neutros do estudo STICH influenciaram as recomendações, o transplante cardíaco continua a ser o tratamento indicado nas fases evolutivas tardias de IC, os dispositivos de assistência circulatória mecânica para terapia de destino passam a ter recomendação, a duração do QRS foi fundamental na indicação de TRV-AV, e o CDI continua com recomendação I para miocardiopatia isquêmica. Entretanto, baseada em análise crítica dos estudos considerando-se o custo-efetividade, o CDI não atingiu recomendação I para classes menos graves devido as limitações dos estudos. Também a importância da cardiotoxicidade por drogas para tratamento de neoplasias foi ressaltada, o tratamento da IC na gravidez e da miocardite foi revisado. Novos potenciais métodos de tratamento em fase de pesquisa são apresentados e novos fluxogramas de diagnóstico e tratamento da IC, reformulados, foram incluído

No abstract

In this largest clinical trial of β-blockers for prevention of cardiotoxicity under contemporary ANT dosage, the authors noted a 13.5% to 14.5% incidence of cardiotoxicity. In this scenario, carvedilol had no impact on the incidence of early onset of LVEF reduction. However, the use of carvedilol resulted in a significant reduction in troponin levels and diastolic dysfunction. (Carvedilol Effect in Preventing Chemotherapy-Induced Cardiotoxicity [CECCY]; NCT01724450).

Background-The effectiveness of heart failure disease management programs in patients under cardiologists' care over long-term follow-up is not established. Methods and Results-We investigated the effects of a disease management program with repetitive education and telephone monitoring on primary (combined death or unplanned first hospitalization and quality-of-life changes) and secondary end points (hospitalization, death, and adherence Key Words: heart failure Ⅲ education Ⅲ disease program management Ⅲ case management Ⅲ controlled clinical trials Ⅲ quality of life Ⅲ patient compliance R ecent disease management program (DMP) meta-analyses have reported reductions in mortality and hospitalizations of heart failure (HF) patients. 1-4 However, important issues in DMP for HF remain to be resolved. For example, few investigations include non-high-risk HF for early hospitalization managed by cardiologists or report long-term results. [3][4][5][6] No studies have reported the long-term effects of a repetitive-cyclic reeducation program. 3,4,7,8 Most DMPs have been tested in high-risk HF patients that have been discharged from the hospital, and it has been suggested that DMPs are less effective when patients are already being treated by an HF specialist. 1,3,7,9,10 Improved survival is associated with cardiologist care and with multidisciplinary teams providing specialized follow-up. 4,8 Whether both together could benefit HF is not well defined. Clinical Perspective see p 124We tested whether a DMP consisting of a long-term repetitive multidisciplinary education program and telephone monitoring could benefit HF outpatients in usual ambulatory care already under the care of a cardiologist with experience in HF. Figure 1). The first patient was randomized on October 5, 1999, and the last on January 18, 2005, in the Heart Institute of the São Paulo University Medical School. At least an 18-month follow-up from inclusion of the last patient was planned to initiate the trial analysis. Referred patients, with no exclusion criteria, were randomized in a 2:1 ratio between the intervention and control parallel groups, respectively. A computer-generated randomization list was drawn up by the statistician. The randomization 2:1 was used based on the previously published benefit of DMP in HF. The 2:1 randomization sequence was developed in blocks of 3, including 2 interventions and 1 control. The order of interventions and control within each block was also randomly assigned. To avoid deduction of the next treatment allocation and for arrangement of education classes, researchers were blinded for block size; each randomization included a number of patients in multiples of 3, with at least 15 eligible participants, except for the last group. The order of subjects in each group was randomized using a computer program. For allocation concealment, sequential, numbered, opaque, and sealed envelopes were used. Investigators ensured that the envelopes were opened sequentially only after the participants' names were written on the app...

Cardiotoxicity is associated with the chronic use of doxorubicin leading to cardiomyopathy and heart failure. Identification of cardiotoxicity-specific miRNA biomarkers could provide clinicians with a valuable prognostic tool. The aim of the study was to evaluate circulating levels of miRNAs in breast cancer patients receiving doxorubicin treatment and to correlate with cardiac function. This is an ancillary study from “Carvedilol Effect on Chemotherapy-induced Cardiotoxicity” (CECCY trial), which included 56 female patients (49.9±3.3 years of age) from the placebo arm. Enrolled patients were treated with doxorubicin followed by taxanes. cTnI, LVEF, and miRNAs were measured periodically. Circulating levels of miR-1, -133b, -146a, and -423-5p increased during the treatment whereas miR-208a and -208b were undetectable. cTnI increased from 6.6±0.3 to 46.7±5.5 pg/mL (p<0.001), while overall LVEF tended to decrease from 65.3±0.5 to 63.8±0.9 (p=0.053) over 12 months. Ten patients (17.9%) developed cardiotoxicity showing a decrease in LVEF from 67.2±1.0 to 58.8±2.7 (p=0.005). miR-1 was associated with changes in LVEF (r=-0.531, p<0.001). In a ROC curve analysis miR-1 showed an AUC greater than cTnI to discriminate between patients who did and did not develop cardiotoxicity (AUC = 0.851 and 0.544, p= 0.0016). Our data suggest that circulating miR-1 might be a potential new biomarker of doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity in breast cancer patients.

Heart transplantation (HT) remains the treatment of choice for advanced chagasic cardiomyopathy. New immunosuppression protocols have provided better control of rejection (RJ) and cardiac allograft vasculopathy. However, their influence on infection and Chagas disease reactivation (CDR) is not well established. The aim of this study was to compare the CDR rate in patients under two different immunosuppression protocols. We studied 39 chagasic patients who had undergone orthotopic HT between April, 1987 and June, 2004. They were divided into two groups, one taking azathioprine (group 1 = 24 patients) and the other taking mycophenolate mofetil (group 2 = 15 patients), in the standard doses (2 mg/kg/day and 2 g/day, respectively), beside prednisone and cyclosporine, in equivalent doses. The number of CDR and RJ episodes were analyzed in the first and second years after HT. CDR rates were 8% ± 5% at 1 year and 12% ± 6% at 2 years of follow-up in group 1. Otherwise, patients in group 2 presented CDR rates of 75% ± 10% and 81% ± 9% at the same periods, respectively (p < 0.0001, hazard ratio = 6.06). When comparing RJ rates in the first year after HT, both groups had similar behavior under both immunosuppression protocols (p = 0.88). These data show that current prescribed doses of mycophenolate mofetil increase the early risk of CDR without changing RJ incidence in this period.

Trypanosoma cruzi (T. cruzi) infection is endemic in Latin America and is becoming a worldwide health burden. It may lead to heterogeneous phenotypes. Early diagnosis of T. cruzi infection is crucial. Several biomarkers have been reported in Chagas heart disease (ChHD), but most are nonspecific for T. cruzi infection. Prognosis of ChHD patients is worse compared with other etiologies, with sudden cardiac death as an important mode of death. Most ChHD patients display diffuse myocarditis with fibrosis and hypertrophy. The remodeling process seems to be associated with etiopathogenic mechanisms and neurohormonal activation. Pharmacological treatment and antiarrhythmic therapy for ChHD is mostly based on results for other etiologies. Heart transplantation is an established, valuable therapeutic option in refractory ChHD. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators are indicated for prevention of secondary sudden cardiac death. Specific etiological treatments should be revisited and reserved for select patients. Understanding and management of ChHD need improvement, including development of randomized trials.

No abstract