IMPORTANCEThe US heart allocation policy was changed on October 18, 2018. The association of this change with recipient and donor selection and outcomes remains to be elucidated.OBJECTIVE To evaluate changes in patient characteristics, wait list outcomes, and posttransplant outcomes after the recent allocation policy change in heart transplant. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTSIn this cohort study, all 15 631 adults undergoing heart transplants, excluding multiorgan transplants, in the US as identified by the United Network for Organ Sharing multicenter, national registry were reviewed. Patients were stratified according to prepolicy change (October 1, 2015, to October 1, 2018) and postpolicy change (October 18, 2018 or after). Follow-up data were available through March 31, 2020.EXPOSURES Heart transplants after the policy change. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURESCompeting risk regression for wait list outcomes was performed. Posttransplant survival was compared using the Kaplan-Meier method, and risk adjustment was performed using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. RESULTSIn this cohort study, of the 15 631 patients undergoing transplant, 10 671 (mean [SD] age, 53.1 [12.7] years; 7823 [73.3%] male) were wait listed before and 4960 (mean [SD] age, 52.7 [13.0] years; 3610 [72.8%] male) were wait listed after the policy change. Competing risk regression demonstrated reduced likelihood of mortality or deterioration (subhazard ratio [SHR], 0.60; 95% CI, 0.52-0.69; P < .001), increased likelihood of transplant (SHR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.32-1.45; P < .001), and reduced likelihood of recovery (SHR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.40-0.73; P < .001) for wait listed patients after the policy change. A total of 6078 patients underwent transplant before and 2801 after the policy change. Notable changes after the policy change included higher frequency of bridging with temporary mechanical circulatory support and lower frequency of bridging with durable left ventricular assist devices. Posttransplant survival was reduced after the policy change (1-year: 92.1% vs 87.5%; log-rank P < .001), a finding that persisted after risk adjustment (HR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.07-1.55; P = .008).CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Substantial changes have occurred in adult heart transplant in the US after the policy change in October 2018. Wait list outcomes have improved, although posttransplant survival has decreased. These data confirm findings from earlier preliminary analyses and demonstrate that these trends have persisted to 1-year follow-up, underscoring the importance of continued reevaluation of the new heart allocation policy.

This preliminary, observational report suggests that dexmedetomidine may have a potential therapeutic role in the acute phase of perioperative atrial and junctional tachyarrhythmias for either HR control or conversion to NSR.

No abstract

No abstract

Background-Although identification of unbalanced atrioventricular septal defect (AVSD) is obvious when extreme, exact criteria to define the limits of unbalanced are not available. We sought to validate an atrioventricular valve index (AVVI) (left atrioventricular valve area/total atrioventricular valve area, centimeters squared) as a discriminator of balanced and unbalanced forms of complete AVSD and to characterize the association of AVVI with surgical strategies and outcomes. Methods and Results-Diagnostic

ECMO was successfully used in children with cardiac disease with 73% and 66% short- and intermediate-term survival, respectively. The majority of the survivors had normal function or only a minimal neurodevelopmental deficit.

Background Postoperative tachyarrhythmias remain a common complication after congenital cardiac surgery. A recent case-series has shown that dexmedetomidine, an alpha-2 adrenoreceptor agonist can have a therapeutic role in supraventricular tachyarrhythmias for either cardioversion to sinus rhythm or heart rate control. The present study was performed to determine if routine perioperative use of dexmedetomidine can decrease the incidence of supraventricular and ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Methods Prospective cohort study of pediatric patients undergoing cardiothoracic surgery. Thirty-two patients who were initiated on dexmedetomidine infusion (DEX-group) before surgery were compared with 20 patients who did not receive dexmedetomidine (control-group). Results Dexmedetomidine was started after anesthesia induction and continued through surgery and postoperative period for 38±4 hours at a mean dose of 0.76 ±0.04 mcg/kg/hr. Ten patients in control-group and 2 in DEX-group (p=0.001) had a total of 16 episodes of tachyarrhythmias. The incidence of ventricular tachycardia was 25% vs.0% (p=0.01) and of supraventricular arrhythmias 25% vs. 6% (p=0.05) in the control and DEX-group respectively. Two patients in the control-group and 1 in the Dex-group had transient complete heart block. Control-group had a higher heart rate 141 ± 5 vs.127 ±3 bpm (p=0.03), more sinus tachycardia episodes 40% vs. 6% (p=0.008), required more antihypertensives with nitroprusside 20 ± 7 vs.4 ± 1 mcg/kg (p=0.004) and nicardipine 13 ± 5 vs.2 ± 1 mcg/kg (p=0.02) and required more fentanyl 39 ± 8 vs.19 ± 3 mcg/kg (p=0.005). Conclusions Perioperative use of dexmedetomidine is associated with significantly decreased incidence of ventricular and supraventricular tachyarrhythmias without significant adverse effects.

No abstract