No abstract

The marine environment is a complex system formed by interactions between ecological structure and functioning, physico-chemical processes and socio-economic systems. An increase in competing marine uses and users requires a holistic approach to marine management which considers the environmental, economic and societal impacts of all activities. If managed sustainably, the marine environment will deliver a range of ecosystem services which lead to benefits for society. In order to understand the complexity of the system, the DPSIR (Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response) approach has long been a valuable problem-structuring framework used to assess the causes, consequences and responses to change in a holistic way. Despite DPSIR being used for a long time, there is still confusion over the definition of its terms and so to be appropriate for current marine management, we contend that this confusion needs to be addressed. Our viewpoint advocates that DPSIR should be extended to DAPSI(W)R(M) (pronounced dap-see-worm) in which Drivers of basic human needs require Activities which lead to Pressures. The Pressures are the mechanisms of State change on the natural system which then leads to Impacts (on human Welfare). Those then require Responses (as Measures). Furthermore, because of the complexity of any managed sea area in terms of multiple Activities, there is the need for a linked-DAPSI(W)R(M) framework, and then the connectivity between marine ecosystems and ecosystems in the catchment and further at sea, requires an interlinked, nested-DAPSI(W)R(M) framework to reflect the continuum between adjacent ecosystems. Finally, the unifying framework for integrated marine management is completed by encompassing ecosystem structure and functioning, ecosystem services and societal benefits. Hence, DAPSI(W)R(M) links the socio-ecological system of the effects of changes to the natural system on the human uses and benefits of the marine system. However, to deliver these sustainably in the light of human activities requires a Risk Assessment and Risk Management framework; the ISO-compliant Bow-Tie method is used here as an example. Finally, to secure ecosystem health and economic benefits such as Blue Growth, successful, adaptive and sustainable marine management Responses (as Measures) are delivered using the 10-tenets, a set of facets covering all management disciplines and approaches.

From 1976 through 1978 primary production of microphytobenthos was measured at 6 stations on intertidal flats in the Ems-Dollard estuary using the 14C method. The purpose of the measurements was to estimate the annual primary production at different sites in the estuary and to investigate the factors that influence the rates of primary production. Therefore benthic chlorophyll a and a set of environmental factors were measured. Only primary production correlated sigruficantly with chlorophyll a concentration in the superficial (0.5 cm) sediment layer; other factors (temperature. in situ irradiance) did not correlate with primary production, primary production rate or assimilation number. Annual primary production ranged from ca. 50 g C m-' to 250 g C m-2 and was closely related to elevation of the tidal flat station. However, highest values were also recorded at the station closest to a waste water discharge point in the inner part of the estuary. Annual primary production can be roughly estimated from the mean annual content of chlorophyll a in the sediment. Use of different calculation methods results in annual primary production values that do not differ greatly from each other. Also productivity rates did not differ much over most of the estuary, except at the innermost station which showed a high production rate in combination with high microalgal biomass; this could not be explained by the high elevation of the station alone. A hypothesis is offered to explain the limited primary production of microphytobenthic vegetations.

No abstract

No abstract