Orienting the chamber parallel to the magnetic field when the field is perpendicular to the photon beam will minimize the effect of the magnetic field on chamber response, and eliminate the problem of the unknown sensitive volume. Values of k and kQmag can bring ion chamber dosimetry in magnetic fields in-line with the TG-51 protocol. PP chamber are sensitive to the magnetic field and variation in chamber response due to small angular changes makes them unlikely candidates for clinical reference dosimetry in magnetic fields. The stability in TPR1020, as a function of magnetic fields and beam qualities, makes it the best beam quality specifier in magnetic fields.

The incorporation of the effect of the magnetic fields in EGSnrc provides the capability to calculate high accuracy ion chamber and phantom doses for the use in MRI-radiation systems. Further, the effect of apparently insignificant experimental details is found to be accentuated by the presence of the magnetic field.

Purpose: The development of magnetic resonance-guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) necessitates accurate Monte Carlo (MC) models of ion chambers for computing ion chamber corrections to compensate for the presence of the magnetic field. This study evaluates the sensitivity of the ion chamber dose response in a magnetic field on the collection volume used in the MC simulation. Methods: The EGSnrc system's egs_chamber application is used with a recently developed and validated magnetic field transport code. The calculated dose to the sensitive volume of the chamber per unit incident photon fluence, normalized to that at 0 T, is evaluated as a function of magnetic field for the PTW 30013, PTW 31006, PTW 31010, Exradin A12S, and Exradin A1SL chambers. The sensitive region is varied by excluding the volume corresponding to either 0, 0.5, or 1 mm of distance away from the stem. The photon field, magnetic field, and ion chamber are all oriented perpendicular to each other as in the majority of published experimental works. Results: The calculations for a Co-60 source demonstrate that variations from the 0 mm simulations are on the order of several percent with a maximum deviation, occurring at 0.5 T, of 1.75 AE 0.03% and 3.39 AE 0.06% for the 0.5 mm or 1 mm simulations, respectively, for a 0.057 cm 3 A1SL chamber. Larger volume chambers showed smaller, but still non-negligible, variations. Simulations of the A1SL chamber with a 7 MV photon source, corresponding to the Elekta MR-linac machine, demonstrate that the effect is slightly reduced but still persists with a maximum deviation of 1.97 AE 0.08% for the 1 mm reduction. Conclusions: Usually, the geometric sensitive volume of the ion chamber is used in MC calculation as a substitute for the potentially unknown, smaller, true collection volume (governed by the complex electric field distribution inside the chamber). The calculations in this study demonstrate that even a small variation in simulated volume can lead to fairly large variations in the MC calculated ion chamber response in a magnetic field. This is an important effect that must be addressed to ensure proper calibration of MRgRT machines using MC ion chamber correction factors. This effect may play a role, even where there is no magnetic field, in small-field dosimetry when volume averaging effect are important.

The out-of-field surface dose contribution due to backscattered or ejected electrons, focused by the magnetic field, is evaluated in this work. This electron streaming effect (ESE) can contribute to out-of-field skin doses in orthogonal magnetic resonance guided radiation therapy machines. Using the EGSnrc Monte Carlo package, a phantom is set-up along the central axis of an incident 10 10 cm2 7 MV FFF photon beam. The phantom exit or entry surface is inclined with respect to the magnetic field, and an out-of-field water panel is positioned 10 cm away from, and centered on, the isocenter. The doses from streaming backscattered or ejected electrons, for either a 0.35 T or 1.5 T magnetic field, are evaluated in the out-of-field water panel for surface inclines of 10, 30, and 45°. The magnetic field focuses electrons emitted from the inclined phantom. Dose distributions at the surface of the out-of-field water panel are sharper in the 1.5 T magnetic field as compared to 0.35 T. The maximum doses for the 0.35 T simulations are 23.2%, 37.8%, and 39.0% for the respective 10, 30, and 45° simulations. For 1.5 T, for the same angles, the maximum values are 17.1%, 29.8%, and 35.8%. Dose values drop to below 2% within the first 1 cm of the out-of-field water phantom. The phantom thickness is an important variable in the magnitude of the ESE dose. The ESE can produce large out-of-field skin doses and must be a consideration in treatment planning in the MRgRT work-flow. Treatments often include multiple beams which will serve to spread out the effect, and many beams, such as anterior–posterior, will reduce the skin dose due to the ESE. A 1 cm thick shielding of either a bolus placed on the patient or mounted on the present RF coils would greatly reduce the ESE dose contributions. Further exploration of the capabilities of treatment planning systems to screen for this effect is required.