This paper addresses the advent of a new stage in the development of relationships associated with the management of agricultural land plots that are in shared ownership. The social group that emerged based on principles of the initial privatization, which was characterized by value-based unity based on collective labor in agricultural production, has, in the course of time, been supplanted by a new type of owners -those not characterized by value-based unity. The method for managing a common property -through general meetings -remains the same. There has yet to be put in place a legal instrument for dealing with the socially inhomogeneous makeup of the owners group that would make it possible to form the collective will of general meetings in accordance with the objectives for managing a property, as the very inhomogeneity of the makeup precludes the possibility of unity of management objectives. In this situation, the phenomenon of collective will lacks proper legal protection from usurpation by an economically strong entity. In this regard, the author proposes carrying out a differentiation of the types of disputes and procedural methods for resolving those disputes.
The article provides an analysis of the concept of the federal territory from the position of the constituents of the legal regime of the said territory, which includes both public-legal and private-legal regulation. The findings of the study suggest that a proposal should be put forward to improve the territorial composition of the federal territory and to include the territorial sea in the part necessary to achieve the goals of the creation of a federal territory.
This article is based on the comparative analysis of civil, land and urban planning legislation. It reveals inconsistency in the regulatory planning of agricultural land use in case of changing its category. As a rule, the subsequent use of agricultural land for different purposes usually leads to fertility loss. This reproduction method has no price and is not expressed in monetary terms. The criteria for determining the value of land used by the Russian legislation are off-market surrogates. In this regard, they are used to transform the value of the land without market turnover into the value of land plots that are characterized by certain market conditions and high demand. Thus, the author of the article suggests supplementing the revealed shortcomings of established regulatory practices with the SEEA accounting system developed by the United Nations Organization to evaluate natural-ecological objects. SEEA (or a similar tool) is used for changing the category of agricultural land as a means of saving land fertility for future generations. Keywords: land category; agricultural land; land rezoning; cadastral value of a land plot.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.