Immunotherapy has dramatically changed the therapeutic landscape of oncology, and has become standard of care in multiple cancer types in front or late lines of therapy, with some longstanding responses and outstanding results. Notwithstanding, its use has brought a totally unique spectrum of adverse events, characterized by a myriad of diverse manifestations affecting nearly every organ and system of the body, including the endocrine, nervous, cardiac, respiratory and gastrointestinal systems. Uncommon adverse events, defined as those occurring in less than 1% of patients, comprise an even more heterogeneous group of diseases that are being seen more recurrently as the use of immune check-point inhibitors increases and indications spread in different tumor types and stages. Here, we comprehensively review some uncommon, but exceedingly important, immune-related adverse events, with special emphasis in the clinical approach and diagnostic workup, aiming to reunite the evidence published previously, allowing an increase in awareness and knowledge from all specialists implicated in the diagnosis, treatment, and care of cancer patients treated with immunotherapy.

No abstract

BackgroundBreast carcinoma with osteoclast-like giant cells (OGCs) is infrequent, being most reported cased described as ductal invasive carcinomas. Invasive pleomorphic lobular carcinoma (PLC) is a distinct morphological variant of invasive lobular carcinoma characterized by higher nuclear atypia and pleomorphism than the classical type. In the best of our knowledge, a PLC with OGCs has not been previously reported.Case presentationWe report the case of a 72-year-old woman presenting with a pleomorphic tumor of the left breast with a dense infiltration by OGCs and T lymphocytes with a 10:1 predominance of CD8+ over CD4+ cells. The diagnosis of a lymphoid or mesenchymal neoplasia was excluded after demonstrating keratin expression by the neoplastic cells. The absence of E-cadherin expression and the morphological features were consistent with the diagnosis PLC with OGCs. In addition, we demonstrated the deleterious mutation C.del866C in CDH1gene, but no mutations in any of the other 33 genes analyzed by next generation sequencing.ConclusionsBreast carcinoma with stromal osteoclast-like giant cells is a very rare tumor, for that reason, the use of the cytologic features and growth patterns in combination with immunohistochemically studies is mandatory for a correct diagnosis of lobular carcinoma. In addition, further studies are necessary to clarify the influence of OGCs in the prognosis of these patients.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s13000-018-0744-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

No abstract

Background The aim of this work is to evaluate the performance of radiomics predictions for a range of molecular, genomic and clinical targets in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) and demonstrate the impact of novel feature selection strategies and sub-segmentations on model interpretability. Methods Contrast-enhanced CT scans from the first 101 patients recruited to the TRACERx Renal Cancer study (NCT03226886) were used to derive radiomics classification models to predict 20 molecular, histopathology and clinical target variables. Manual 3D segmentation was used in conjunction with automatic sub-segmentation to generate radiomics features from the core, rim, high and low enhancing sub-regions, and the whole tumour. Comparisons were made between two classification model pipelines: a Conventional pipeline reflecting common radiomics practice, and a Proposed pipeline including two novel feature selection steps designed to improve model interpretability. For both pipelines nested cross-validation was used to estimate prediction performance and tune model hyper-parameters, and permutation testing was used to evaluate the statistical significance of the estimated performance measures. Further model robustness assessments were conducted by evaluating model variability across the cross-validation folds. Results Classification performance was significant (p < 0.05, H0:AUROC = 0.5) for 11 of 20 targets using either pipeline and for these targets the AUROCs were within ± 0.05 for the two pipelines, except for one target where the Proposed pipeline performance increased by > 0.1. Five of these targets (necrosis on histology, presence of renal vein invasion, overall histological stage, linear evolutionary subtype and loss of 9p21.3 somatic alteration marker) had AUROC > 0.8. Models derived using the Proposed pipeline contained fewer feature groups than the Conventional pipeline, leading to more straightforward model interpretations without loss of performance. Sub-segmentations lead to improved performance and/or improved interpretability when predicting the presence of sarcomatoid differentiation and tumour stage. Conclusions Use of the Proposed pipeline, which includes the novel feature selection methods, leads to more interpretable models without compromising prediction performance. Trial registration NCT03226886 (TRACERx Renal)

No abstract

10569 Background: Preliminary data has highlighted inherited predisposition to lung cancer (LC) related to certain pathogenic germline variant (PGV) in cancer predisposing genes, including patients (pts) with tumors harboring somatic driver oncogene alterations (alt); however, the frequency of PGV in LC is unknown. Liquid biopsy assays may be able to identify incidental PGV (iPGV) in pts with solid tumors at scale. Here, we report the prevalence of iPGV in genes predisposing to cancer in pts with advanced non-small cell LC (aNSCLC) relative to driver alt status. Methods: Genomic results were retrospectively queried from 31126 pts with aNSCLC who had Guardant360 testing as part of routine clinical care from 10/2020-12/2021. iPGVs were defined as being non-synonymous, non-VUS alt in selected genes known to increase lifetime cancer risk (Table) with variant allele frequency (VAF) >30% and pathogenicity defined by a proprietary bioinformatics pipeline. Clinical factors such as age, gender, histology, and diagnosis status (new/progressing) were extracted from test requisition forms. The driver group included guideline-recommended and emerging somatic mutations (m) in EGFR/KRAS/BRAF/MET/HER2, fusions (f) in ALK/ROS1/RET/NTRK1-3 and amplifications (a) in HER2/MET. Results: Out of 31126, 720 (2.3%) of pts had predicted iPGV, of whom 54% were female, with a median age of 64 (22-100); most pts were newly diagnosed (66%). Among them, 92% of pts had iPGVs identified in the homologous recombination and repair (HRR) pathway, 3% in mismatch repair (MMR) pathway and 5% EGFR iPGVs. A total of 335 (47%) pts with iPGVs had somatic driver alt (Table): 20% of pts with iPGV had KRASm (n=144/720; 67 G12C), 12% EGFRm (n=87; 28 ex19del, 35 ex21(L858R)), 2.5% BRAFm (n=18), 2.5% METm ex14 skip (n=18), 0.1% HER2m (n=1), 0.8% ALKf (n=6), 0.1% ROS1f (n=1), 0.1% RETf (n=1), 0.1% HER2a (n=1), and 0.4% METa (n=3). ATM iPGVs were enriched in pts with driver alt. (45% driver vs 27% non-driver, p<0.0001) while BRCA1 iPGVs were more frequently observed in pts without driver alt. (17% vs 8%, p<0.0001). Distribution of other iPGVs was similar across driver/non-driver groups. Conclusions: In this large cohort, 2.3% of pts with aNSCLC were iPGV-carriers; 47% of pts had oncogene-driven tumors, particularly with KRAS, EGFR, BRAF and MET alt. iPGV and lung carcinogenesis need further evaluation to define the role of genetic predisposition in LC risk and to determine the highest risk individuals to explore screening and therapeutic strategies, such as in pts with other solid tumors. [Table: see text]