Menopause is in the process of becoming medicalized. Midlife and older women are being told that natural menopause is actually a deficiency condition requiring replacement hormones to maintain health and increase longevity. The three major diseases that are being linked with the lower estrogen levels of midlife and older women are heart disease, osteoporosis and, most recently, Alzheimer's disease. Primary prevention of these diseases is the rationale used for urging healthy women to take long-term hormones. Although there have been many challenges to these links and warnings against the widespread use of hormones, they have been either ignored or trivialized. In this article, the author examines mortality and morbidity statistics across and within nations and over time, critiques the major arguments used to support the notion that menopause places women at an increased risk of disease and that exogenous hormones reduce this risk, and discusses the adverse consequences of defining all midlife and older women as hormonally deficient and in need of medical intervention.

The construction of menopause as an estrogen deficiency condition originated primarily in the United States and is being exported to many other countries throughout the world. I have identified specific cultural assumptions and policies in the United States as well as the ubiquitous gender biases that have contributed to the medicalization of menopause. Since medicalized menopause is causing harm to women worldwide, it is imperative that it be addressed by the international community.